larryepage wrote:
Same confusion as 40 years ago when everyone confused the RS-232 signal interface with the DB-25 connector. The RS232 recommended standard never specified a connection mechanism. No one understood that there was no such thing as a RS-232 connector.
Well, there was a "standard" connector that was used for RS-232.
Do you remember current-loop? That had its own style connector also.
Look at the size difference between IDE and SATA connectors.
Same scenario. New smaller connectors.
The greater information transfer speed of the "C" connector (terminal) is significant, though as far as I can tell the charge rate is not. The article quoted above is consistent with this.
Non poster has addressed my original question though.
Longshadow wrote:
Well, there was a "standard" connector that was used for RS-232.
Do you remember current-loop? That had its own style connector also.
Look at the size difference between IDE and SATA connectors.
Same scenario. New smaller connectors.
Yes...the DB-25 was the defacto standard. Somewhere along the way, it became the DB-15, then other connectors, including some of the DIN options.
Wires with connectors in any case, that's all they are.
Nothing more.
Cables do not define speed.
The materials used in the cable define the cable's ability to handle high speed signals preserving signal quality, or not.
Clearly incorrect re materials. The materials used for USB 2 & 3 are the same - the wiring is different.
I think you are confusing USB 2, 3.0 & 3.1 data transfer protocols which yield different baud rates and bandwidth capability. The various connectors are an entirely different issue.
USB A - the big square plugs, can be connected to a variety of end plugs, micro, mini, USB C etc, using differing wiring configurations, conductors etc.
My laptop - like many many others - uses a USB-C connector to charge it, and the laptop draws up to 65w. No previous gen of USB connector has anywhere near that level of power transmission.
USB-C - which is usually USB 3.1 protocol and cables are usually USB-A on one end, USB-C on the other until USB-C to USB-C becomes the de facto standard - manages MUCH higher data rates than its predecessors.
Believe whatever you like, but those are simple facts.
alexol wrote:
Clearly incorrect re materials. The materials used for USB 2 & 3 are the same - the wiring is different.
I think you are confusing USB 2, 3.0 & 3.1 data transfer protocols which yield different baud rates and bandwidth capability. The various connectors are an entirely different issue.
USB A - the big square plugs, can be connected to a variety of end plugs, micro, mini, USB C etc, using differing wiring configurations, conductors etc.
My laptop - like many many others - uses a USB-C connector to charge it, and the laptop draws up to 65w. No previous gen of USB connector has anywhere near that level of power transmission.
USB-C - which is usually USB 3.1 protocol and cables are usually USB-A on one end, USB-C on the other until USB-C to USB-C becomes the de facto standard - manages MUCH higher data rates than its predecessors.
Believe whatever you like, but those are simple facts.
Clearly incorrect re materials. The materials use... (
show quote)
Right on! That explains why I need a pure "C" hub.
With all these different connectors in use nowadays, I think I need to start color-coding all my cables, inputs and cable adapters.
rook2c4 wrote:
With all these different connectors in use nowadays, I think I need to start color-coding all my cables, inputs and cable adapters.
I tried to buy different color cables to make it easier but there is such a mishmash of cables out there (prices, colors, sizes). I just ended up making a label for each cable instead.
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
mikegreenwald wrote:
There are many so called USB C hubs available, but all that I've found are USB C in, and multiple outputs of which no more than two are C type. However many or most modern peripherals are C only. Thus I need a hub which has C in, and at least four C outs. I'm aware of several work arounds, but simpler is better.
Surprisingly to me, my LG high def monitor has four C sockets, one of which is dedicated to the IN side & three outs.
Can anyone point me to a source for a hub with one C in and four C outs?
There are many so called USB C hubs available, but... (
show quote)
No. How about 1 in and 7 out? Anker is the make of it. Got it at an Apple store in their "other periferals".
mikegreenwald wrote:
There are many so called USB C hubs available, but all that I've found are USB C in, and multiple outputs of which no more than two are C type. However many or most modern peripherals are C only. Thus I need a hub which has C in, and at least four C outs. I'm aware of several work arounds, but simpler is better.
Surprisingly to me, my LG high def monitor has four C sockets, one of which is dedicated to the IN side & three outs.
Can anyone point me to a source for a hub with one C in and four C outs?
There are many so called USB C hubs available, but... (
show quote)
https://www.sir-apfelot.de/en/why-there-are-no-usb-c-hubs-with-multiple-usb-c-ports-30504/That said, OWC does have a ThunderBolt 4 dock with three USB-C outlets and one input. It also has several other ports on it.
https://eshop.macsales.com/shop/owc-thunderbolt-dockThey also sell a ThunderBolt 4 HUB
https://eshop.macsales.com/shop/owc-thunderbolt-hubFor best results, these should be used with the latest Thunderbolt 3 or 4 equipped computers.
Remember, USB-C is not a protocol, it is just a connector. That connector is used for:
Thunderbolt 4, 3, 2, 1
Ethernet 10/100/1000/10Gb
Firewire 800
USB 1.1
USB 2
USB 3, 3.1, 3.2, USB4
Audio in/out
HDMI
DisplayPort
…and probably some other protocols I can't remember.
A Thunderbolt 4 cable can connect all kinds of devices to a Thunderbolt 3 or 4 (USB4) computer, via the right hub or dongle on the other end.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
Here are a couple of charts which clarify matters. Note that with the exception of USB 3.2 Gen2x2 (2 data lanes) which requires the C type connector because of the multiple lanes, there is no direct relationship between the connector and the speed (Type As are usable from USB 1.0 to USB 3.2 Gen 2 (sometimes referred to as 3.1)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.