Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Which Focal Length Poll
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
Dec 17, 2021 06:07:18   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.


I use primarily the Nikon 16-35 f4 for landscapes, I also use the Nikon 24-120 when needed. I like the fact that both lenses have the same 77 mm thread for filters.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 06:37:13   #
dogman24
 
Magnificent photos.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 06:38:25   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
dogman24 wrote:
Magnificent photos.


Thank you.

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Dec 17, 2021 06:47:36   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
With my Nikon 17 - 35 f2.8, I usually shoot it at 24mm f5.6. I think it gives me the sharpest images.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:00:37   #
n4jee Loc: New Bern, NC
 
I have reduced my interchangeable lens collection to a single lens. What ever I point my camera at is with a 24-240 zoom. My pocket camera has a 25-250 equilivent.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:06:11   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Elmo55 wrote:
The questions are: "What is your focal length of choice for shooting landscape panos?" Prime or zoom? If zoom what focal length do you normally use? Just curious as I watched a You Tube video last night where the guy used a nifty 50.


It does depend on the situation .....my overall preference would be 35mm prime lens in portrait orientation....
.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:21:56   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Wide, with a zoom lens.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2021 09:38:18   #
GeneinChi Loc: Chicago, IL
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Breathtakingly beautiful!

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:47:34   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
Gene: Wonderful shots!!! I appreciate your skill and sharing.

I started pianos with a 24-105 many years ago, generally set around 60-85 mm.
About four years ago I switched to a 50mm prime, usually set for portrait mode, with improved results. As others have said, using a wide lens defeats the purpose of most pianos because it squeezes too much data into too small a space; using 50mm or longer lens gets a sharper picture for large prints.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 09:52:06   #
badapple Loc: Twin Lake, Michigan
 
To Gene51: marvelous photos!

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:10:31   #
lhardister Loc: Brownsville, TN
 
[quote=Gene51]45 usually, 85 a little less frequently ....

Awesome works, Gene. Thanks for sharing.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 17, 2021 10:13:11   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Show off! Geez, Gene - now I feel so, so, inadequate!

Did you have to don waders to get that shot? Fantastic work!

Stan

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:15:40   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


Those images would make one believe that you know what you are doing.

Beautiful images Gene.

---

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:21:47   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
All scenes are different and for that reason I use zoom lenses all the time. But, that is me. I don't own any thing but zoom.

Reply
Dec 17, 2021 10:36:44   #
rcarol
 
Gene51 wrote:
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to 300mm on occasion. Prime/zoom doesn't matter. I almost never use anything shorter than 45mm - too much distortion (corners, edges) for panos.

Multi-row pano - 7 columns, 2 rows, 85mm:

_DSC1933-NIKON D800-3064517-(25-10-17)-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi-row pano - 5 columns, 3 rows, 45mm:

_DSC2139-NIKON D800-3064517-(01-11-17)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Three row vertical pano, 45mm:

_DSC1271-Pano.jpg by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

8 image pano, one row, 100mm:

_DSC9742-Pano by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image pano, one row - 85mm:

_DSC6731-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

3 image vertical pano - 85mm:

_DSC6134-HDR-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

HDR Pano - 4 images, 45mm:

_DSC5457-Pano-Edit-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

Multi row pano, 5 columns x 2 rows, 150mm, hand held:

_DSC7784-NIKON D810-3007990-(09-04-18)-Pano-Edit by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
45 usually, 85 a little less frequently but up to ... (show quote)


These are a beautiful set of images.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.