Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What is "artistic photography"?
Page <<first <prev 14 of 19 next> last>>
Nov 5, 2021 00:13:39   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Wallen wrote:
Its all good. Just keeping the brain cells occupied.
Unfortunately, the discussion between TNT and I keep deviating from the original context.

Part of the thread went like this:
First he dismisses the proof I sent as immaterial;
"This videos are all about the fine art market and say nothing about art itself".
Putting that in perspective, Saying that the fine art market has nothing to do with art is saying A fish market has nothing to do with fish.
So I answered "That is illogical. Fine art and its market is the pinnacle of art in our present times".
Meaning at present, it is those sectors that are actually what's making the big moves in the art scene.

He ended with;
"If I were to apply the same criteria to music then some k-pop boy band would be considered the pinnacle of musical achievement."
To which I actually agree with him adding "that it why we have polarization of ideas".

His rebuttal was now a different angle as he now accuses me of thinking that "the market is the pinnacle".
and continued with "Selling art has nothing to do with the creation of art. Creation is the pinnacle."

So here we now are on a totally different railroad.
Its now the fish market has nothing to do with fishing, and etc.

I guess its my fault, just like the tiger, lion & donkey story, I continued to discuss something we would not really agree upon and kept following him in new rabbit holes.


Those aside,
Yes I am a commercial artist. I'm actually earning my bread producing monstrosities .
I'm also an old kid. I still notice and get awed by simple things so I get to live both sides of the coin. Art is my life. That is why it hurts me much to see the knowledge, skill, the art itself degenerating, instead of being encouraged to reach loftier goals.
I've seen its many faces and yes, not all of it is smiling and beautiful.

.
Its all good. Just keeping the brain cells occupie... (show quote)


I’m pretty sure fish would get along fine, actually even better, without any fish market.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 00:30:18   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
srt101fan wrote:
Interesting categorization. I'm having a little trouble with it because I think many subjects could cross over. But if it works for you go for it! One thing we can agree on is that it is a complicated subject!


Yes some do cross over. It's kind of sad, but being an artist, I am way too picky. I look at photographs and think that only the ones I'd want to hang on my wall are the ones I'd call artistic. There are LOTS of great photographers here, so I see a lot of photos I'd love on my wall. I may not word that to make sense to some, but I don't claim to be good with words.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 04:37:26   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
srt101fan wrote:
....Communication in this forum can be very difficult at times. If you say anything other than "thumbs up" or "nice work" there's always some probability you'll be misinterpreted.....


Misinterpretation is just one potential source of problems, and it doesn't have to result in hostility. The trouble is, as soon as insults start creeping in it can affect the whole mood of a thread, and when that happens, things that weren't meant to be offensive can be perceived as being offensive. And of course insults can provoke hostility and hostility can provoke more hostility. Some of the members here should remind themselves that it's possible to criticise without being insulting or provocative. This is a photography forum, not the delinquency section of a reform school.

On a more positive note, congratulations on starting another interesting thread and congratulations on doing a good job of stewarding it . There are those who think it should have run its course by page 3 - the funny thing is some of them are still here and actively involved in this thread (14 pages and counting). We can't claim that the whole 14 pages have had good content, but then again we shouldn't let the occasional bad example spoil an otherwise constructive exchange.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2021 09:03:50   #
makurow
 
Nice paraphrase of Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart's definition of pornography.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 10:47:35   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
"HORSEART" I agree that the photos that ctuures you want to hang on the wall are the only ones that are art. The pictures that are great in a technical way or can be a nice picture but not be art. To me it's the subject and it's presentation that make it art.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 11:23:35   #
whatdat Loc: Del Valle, Tx.
 
I think the concept of artistry is in the eye of the beholder; each person with their own perception.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 11:30:24   #
User ID
 
whatdat wrote:
I think the concept of artistry is in the eye of the beholder; each person with their own perception.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2021 13:18:12   #
srt101fan
 
R.G. wrote:
Misinterpretation is just one potential source of problems, and it doesn't have to result in hostility. The trouble is, as soon as insults start creeping in it can affect the whole mood of a thread, and when that happens, things that weren't meant to be offensive can be perceived as being offensive. And of course insults can provoke hostility and hostility can provoke more hostility. Some of the members here should remind themselves that it's possible to criticise without being insulting or provocative. This is a photography forum, not the delinquency section of a reform school.

On a more positive note, congratulations on starting another interesting thread and congratulations on doing a good job of stewarding it . There are those who think it should have run its course by page 3 - the funny thing is some of them are still here and actively involved in this thread (14 pages and counting). We can't claim that the whole 14 pages have had good content, but then again we shouldn't let the occasional bad example spoil an otherwise constructive exchange.
Misinterpretation is just one potential source of ... (show quote)


Thank you for the kind words, R.G. I always look forward to your contributions to the forum. The response to this topic has been very gratifying and I very much appreciate all the thoughtful comments posted. A difficult and multi-faceted subject/issue to discuss, especially when it awakens strong emotional reactions.

Except for a college elective course in art history, and a few short photography courses, I do not have a formal background in the arts. But I do very much enjoy viewing artworks, whether it's in museums, on-line or in books. And I enjoy good discussions on the subject.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 14:19:23   #
srt101fan
 
Ran across a reference to this photographer (Rumi Ando) on Twitter this morning. They are photographic images of Tokyo with manipulated colors and usual details of a cityscape - signs, poles, etc. - removed. I think this qualifies as "artistic photography". What say you?

https://www.creativeboom.com/inspiration/rumi-ando-tokyo-nude/ (Ignore the last word in the link; it is the photographer's reference to buildings stripped of usually seen details!)

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 16:07:54   #
User ID
 
srt101fan wrote:
Ran across a reference to this photographer (Rumi Ando) on Twitter this morning. They are photographic images of Tokyo with manipulated colors and usual details of a cityscape - signs, poles, etc. - removed. I think this qualifies as "artistic photography". What say you?

https://www.creativeboom.com/inspiration/rumi-ando-tokyo-nude/ (Ignore the last word in the link; it is the photographer's reference to buildings stripped of usually seen details!)

Visions of an artist.

Reply
Nov 5, 2021 18:27:30   #
cmc4214 Loc: S.W. Pennsylvania
 
R.G. wrote:
Misinterpretation is just one potential source of problems, and it doesn't have to result in hostility. The trouble is, as soon as insults start creeping in it can affect the whole mood of a thread, and when that happens, things that weren't meant to be offensive can be perceived as being offensive. And of course insults can provoke hostility and hostility can provoke more hostility. Some of the members here should remind themselves that it's possible to criticise without being insulting or provocative. This is a photography forum, not the delinquency section of a reform school.

On a more positive note, congratulations on starting another interesting thread and congratulations on doing a good job of stewarding it . There are those who think it should have run its course by page 3 - the funny thing is some of them are still here and actively involved in this thread (14 pages and counting). We can't claim that the whole 14 pages have had good content, but then again we shouldn't let the occasional bad example spoil an otherwise constructive exchange.
Misinterpretation is just one potential source of ... (show quote)


Part of the "problem" stems from the English language not being good enough to write a sentence that can not be interpreted in different ways by different people. Another problem is that you cannot see the writers expression, or mood which could tell you if someone is really angry (or not)

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2021 23:58:06   #
User ID
 
cmc4214 wrote:
Part of the "problem" stems from the English language not being good enough to write a sentence that can not be interpreted in different ways by different people. Another problem is that you cannot see the writers expression, or mood which could tell you if someone is really angry (or not)

Not true about ambiguity being baked in to English. But it does take a few extra words to avoid ambiguity and you will almost never see that used online. Also, compared to routine spoken English, the extra words make the accurate written version seem awkward when that little voice in our heads is reciting what we write as we are writing it.

Reply
Nov 6, 2021 00:55:00   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
srt101fan wrote:
I see folks here use the term "artistic photography". It's not always clear to me what they mean by that. Anyone want to give us their view?


Photography that tries to be Fine Art but doesn't quite get there.

Reply
Nov 6, 2021 04:36:11   #
cmc4214 Loc: S.W. Pennsylvania
 
User ID wrote:
Not true about ambiguity being baked in to English. But it does take a few extra words to avoid ambiguity and you will almost never see that used online. Also, compared to routine spoken English, the extra words make the accurate written version seem awkward when that little voice in our heads is reciting what we write as we are writing it.


I would think that if you are correct, there would be no use for lawyers.

Reply
Nov 6, 2021 09:26:57   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Wikipedia offers a useful starting point for description and discussion of art: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art

The practice of craft, craftmanship, workmanship, handicraft, and suchlike enters the discussion, too.

That said, the craft aspect of photography may rise to art in the right hands.

Both craft and art function within the visual arts.

For example, a sitting chair while functional may also appeal to the visual sense as attractive, and enough so that depending on the viewer, the appearance of the chair as object transcends the sphere of mere craft.

Further, an intangible pleasure may occur to the sitter from occupying this work of craftsmanship, prompting by it at least a sense of artfulness.

A fine line modulates the distinction of art and craft.

This Wikipedia presentation offers more understanding of the history of art and craft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workmanship#Workmanship_and_craftsmanship
repleo wrote:
Photography that tries to be Fine Art but doesn't quite get there.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.