Bazbo wrote:
Adults should not use that word around volatile children.It can trigger hissy fits.
Then you should cover your eyes.
Racmanaz wrote:
LOL You are full of Lefty crapola as usual, Trump is not responsible for any deaths, just another Lefty lunacy assertion.
Read the interview he gave Bob Woodward in Feb. 2020. It's one thing to yell fire in a theatre but yelling no fire when there is one is quite a bit different.
Remember Rich, "Your character is your future."
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Racmanaz wrote:
Then you should cover your eyes.
Don'g you realize how much fun it is getting you amped up and spinning out of control?
On the other hand, having exchanges like this with a child is demeaning, especially after the amusement has worn off. So good bye little boy.
--Baz out.
Bazbo wrote:
Don'g you realize how much fun it is getting you amped up and spinning out of control?
On the other hand, having exchanges like this with a child is demeaning, especially after the amusement has worn off. So good bye little boy.
--Baz out.
LOL You must be a close relative of Dirtpusher, always getting it wrong.
dsturr wrote:
Good night Rich.
Good night to you as well, stay safe. :)
Bazbo wrote:
Don'g you realize how much fun it is getting you amped up and spinning out of control?
On the other hand, having exchanges like this with a child is demeaning, especially after the amusement has worn off. So good bye little boy.
--Baz out.
Best thing to do about rac is ignore him
dsturr wrote:
”. . . But surely you have to admit that the jackasses (5 in the last week or so) dying of the very disease they claim is some sort of hoax is just a bit ironic”.
Yes, that is definitely ironic.
Almost iconic!
Persons who have an option to ‘save themselves’ from the potential ravages of a disease yet refuse to do so continue to confuse me.
Wyantry wrote:
Yes, that is definitely ironic.
Almost iconic!
Persons who have an option to ‘save themselves’ from the potential ravages of a disease yet refuse to do so continue to confuse me.
They didnt confuse you you been that for years
dirtpusher wrote:
They didnt confuse you you been that for years
Yep! Confused by idiots. Why would they intentionally act in that manner?
Confused by stupidity. Why would people not look at factual evidence?
Confused by intentional disinformation. Why do people promote obviously false information?
Confused by religion. Why do folks think religions have all the answers?
Confused by those that have a chance to avoid a disease yet refuse to take precautions. Why not get vaccinated?
Confused by people that deny science. Why would people think that folk-medicines and horse drugs work?
Confused by political twits and airheads. Why do politicians deny that people are sick and dying?
Confused by those that claim the vaccines are not vaccines. Why deny a factual definition? And evidence?
Confused by persons claiming the vaccines have not been tested. Why do they not understand these are some of the MOST tested vaccines ever developed?
What I am NOT confused about is that many of the above listed “confusions” are TOTALLY AVOIDABLE!
I am NOT confused about the fact that vaccinations are effective for many diseases. SARS CoV-2 included.
I am NOT confused about the numbers of unvaccinated overwhelming the medical facilities. (Although The rationale for avoiding that by getting vaccinated is puzzling).
If you think YOU have all the answers, you are obviously WRONG.
Wyantry wrote:
Yep!
Confused by idiots. Why would they intentionally act in that manner?
Confused by stupidity. Why would people not look at factual evidence?
Confused by intentional disinformation. Why do people promote obviously false information?
Confused by religion. Why do folks think religions have all the answers?
Confused by those that have a chance to avoid a disease yet refuse to take precautions. Why not get vaccinated?
Confused by people that deny science. Why would people think that folk-medicines and horse drugs work?
Confused by political twits and airheads. Why do politicians deny that people are sick and dying?
Confused by those that claim the vaccines are not vaccines. Why deny a factual definition? And evidence?
Confused by persons claiming the vaccines have not been tested. Why do they not understand these are some of the MOST tested vaccines ever developed?
What I am NOT confused about is that many of the above listed “confusions” are TOTALLY AVOIDABLE!
I am NOT confused about the fact that vaccinations are effective for many diseases. SARS CoV-2 included.
I am NOT confused about the numbers of unvaccinated overwhelming the medical facilities. (Although The rationale for avoiding that by getting vaccinated is puzzling).
If you think YOU have all the answers, you are obviously WRONG.
b Yep! /b br u Confused by idiots. /u Why... (
show quote)
Ye has to decider which is real and not. But since your not confused maybe need put you in charge of the disease controll center ,
Not
dirtpusher wrote:
He has to decider which is real not. But since your not confused maybe need put you in charge of the disease controll center ,
Not
It looks as though, along with your inability to construct a coherent English sentence, you evidently suffer from a learning disability concerning reading comprehension.
It was pretty damn clearly stated what I might be confused about. As well as what does NOT appear confusing.
If you are unable to understand that, and the difference, there is no requirement for further discussion.
Good bye.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.