Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Purchased New Camera and Lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Aug 28, 2021 13:11:32   #
stan0301 Loc: Colorado
 
a 300 2.8 is a handful - I use a Tamron 16-300 most all the time (not for portraits) and easily enlarge to 20x30 - on a trip I pair that with the Sigma 8-16 - not much they can't h handle

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 13:16:19   #
Warhorse Loc: SE Michigan
 
My D500 currently wears the Nikon18-300mm lens most of the time, and always has the Nikon MB-D17 battery grip attached.
While this configuration may not be everyone else's "cup o' tea" due to it's weight and size, it works well for me.

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 13:59:36   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
gary8803 wrote:
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Post. I went the less expensive route I decided to get a Dslr not a mirrorless camera.

I got the Nikon D500 and the Nikon 200-500mm 5.6 lens

I made this choice because I like the feel of the DSLR better then the Mirrorless I have big hands. I read a lot of good reviews about the D500 for wildlife paired with the 200-500 lens plus I have experienced how well the Nikon D3 worked for me a few years ago.

Yes a Sony A1 would have been nice or a Canon R5 but the cost was not worth it for me after I started to think what my purpose was fun photography. Out of my $10000.00 budget I still have $7500.00 left to buy other thing I may want.

So thanks again for the advice that you all presented.
Gary
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Pos... (show quote)


Although I wasn't one of your advisors and do not shoot with that combination or brand even, from several different online photo platforms, consistantly, the people who are getting what I consider the best critter shots I see are shooting with that combo you got and surprisingly they are mostly females, so be proud, brave, and manly because it's now all up to you.

Reply
 
 
Aug 28, 2021 14:06:13   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Enjoy your trip!

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 14:15:24   #
harolnick
 
The best news is that Costa Rica children--from kindergarten on--learn the benefits of conservation, the treasures of jungles and mountains. So the plethora of birds and animals, the tiniest orchids and the most magnificent trees are all yours. Except for a few smugglers on the coast (most not Costa Ricans), this is a paradise not only for you but for all the earth's creatures. By the way, take your time taking shots of the sloths.They are very patient.

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 15:35:53   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
gary8803 wrote:
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Post. I went the less expensive route I decided to get a Dslr not a mirrorless camera.

I got the Nikon D500 and the Nikon 200-500mm 5.6 lens

I made this choice because I like the feel of the DSLR better then the Mirrorless I have big hands. I read a lot of good reviews about the D500 for wildlife paired with the 200-500 lens plus I have experienced how well the Nikon D3 worked for me a few years ago.

Yes a Sony A1 would have been nice or a Canon R5 but the cost was not worth it for me after I started to think what my purpose was fun photography. Out of my $10000.00 budget I still have $7500.00 left to buy other thing I may want.

So thanks again for the advice that you all presented.
Gary
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Pos... (show quote)

Good move. Always a good idea to buy what you’re most comfortable with.

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 18:53:01   #
Moondoggie Loc: Southern California
 
Congratulations on making a decision. I’m sure you’ll enjoy your new camera system. Please post some of your new pictures. 😀

Reply
 
 
Aug 28, 2021 19:17:10   #
PAR4DCR Loc: A Sunny Place
 
I think you made a good decision. Now you have $7,500.00 for more glass!

Don

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 21:27:14   #
Murray Loc: New Westminster
 
Great choice in my view. Congrats

Reply
Aug 28, 2021 22:34:37   #
sholland98 Loc: Benbrook, Texas
 
The D500 is my choice for wildlife. Also have the D850 but still favor the D500. I own the 200-500 and the Sigma 150-600 contemporary, and favor that lense over the 200-500. That being said, the 200-500 performs well.

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 00:25:53   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
Your like me Gary, i also like the look & feel of a larger DSLR over a smaller mirrorless camera and you'll be happy about the longer battery life of a DSLR...Newer technology isn't always the best technology.

Reply
 
 
Aug 29, 2021 06:43:36   #
ClarkJohnson Loc: Fort Myers, FL and Cohasset, MA
 
As others have suggested, having at least one other lens with a shorter focal range would be a good complement to the 200-500. The D500 is DX format, so your choices could be among the lighter weight DX lenses. My recommendation would be to pick up the DX 16-80 f2.8-4. This is one of the best DX lenses out there, very versatile, and for some weird reason Nikon has discontinued it. The other usual DX recommendation is the DX 35mm f1.8, which has excellent IQ, is lightweight and dirt cheap. Enjoy the trip!

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 15:49:25   #
mundy-F2 Loc: Chicago suburban area
 
gary8803 wrote:
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Post. I went the less expensive route I decided to get a Dslr not a mirrorless camera.

I got the Nikon D500 and the Nikon 200-500mm 5.6 lens

I made this choice because I like the feel of the DSLR better then the Mirrorless I have big hands. I read a lot of good reviews about the D500 for wildlife paired with the 200-500 lens plus I have experienced how well the Nikon D3 worked for me a few years ago.

Yes a Sony A1 would have been nice or a Canon R5 but the cost was not worth it for me after I started to think what my purpose was fun photography. Out of my $10000.00 budget I still have $7500.00 left to buy other thing I may want.

So thanks again for the advice that you all presented.
Gary
Thank you everyone who posted to my Costa Rica Pos... (show quote)


Enjoy your new camera and lens.
Mundy

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 16:22:42   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
I agree that a moderate but flexible zoom would be a good addition. I bought a 24-120mm f/4, intending for it to be an alternative "informal" lens for my D850. It serves that purpose nicely, but has actually ended up serving mostly as an alternative to my 17-55mm f/2.8 on my D500. Found it used, but like new for $425, and had to buy my own hood from KEH for another $25.

Reply
Aug 29, 2021 16:40:30   #
Sidwalkastronomy Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
Looks like another big GAS attack got handled very nicely

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.