So sad that they love to photograph them but actually killed them. Rules are there for a reason people.
The fact that they refused to leave even after being asked to do so speaks of arrogance & self-entitlement seen too often these days. Hope none of their shots came out.
You're mind kind of person. I would have sent them a gag of S..T with it. In case they were missing a spot in their heads.
When a ranger orders me to do something, I would need a very good reason to disobey the ranger's instruction, regardless if I agree with the ranger's assessment or not. Taking photos is definitely not a valid reason to disobey!
It is a great shame to hear about moronic selfish photographers. The coastal rangers need to have the authority to forcibly remove the offending photographers and fine, or confiscate camera gear. Never publish the location of rare birds nesting, it is what we try to do here in this part of South Australia.
Really I don’t get it. Or maybe I do get it. If it weren’t for class and race privileges the protocol would be that you get five minutes to vamoose. Four minutes later baseball bats rain down on cameras and lenses. Thaz the level of leniency shown to “lesser” folks for lesser transgressions.
Ok thaz the angry scenario. Less violent is you cuff the offenders, escort them off of the reserve, release them and banish them. Notice that their gear is left behind to be recycled.
First scenario was angry venting. Second scenario looks like a plan.
(But I still like scenario number one.)
Close it periode, if they can’t be reasonable then shut it out no more sand bar
srat50
Loc: Ware, Massachusetts
We have two pandemics. Covid (curable) and stupidity (no Known Cure)
I guess there is something about this scenario that I didn't get. Supposedly there were authorities there, but were unable or uninterested in removing the photographers. I think there is more to the story.
Bullfrog Bill wrote:
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concern has risen about the well-being of shorebirds there.
August 16, 2021 — For the good of the shorebirds feeding and resting now at Milford Point, Connecticut Audubon has decided to schedule no group walks to the point's sandbar for the rest of August.
We are also asking for your help in giving the shorebirds room to feed and rest when you visit on your own.
On a morning two weeks ago, four photographers carried their equipment out to the sandbar.
To make sure they were close enough to get the photos they wanted, they settled onto the sand within 50 feet of two American Oystercatchers and their baby.
The baby oystercatcher was too young to fly and the parents were too attached to leave it on its own. Connecticut Audubon’s coastal ranger asked the photographers to please move farther away.
But they stayed. The birds were on high alert and distracted from resting, feeding and keeping cool in the midday heat.
By 1:30, shortly after the photographers’ four-hour stakeout, the baby American Oystercatcher was dead.
A necropsy showed that it starved to death.
Oystercatchers at Milford Point attempted 20 nests during the 2021 season.
Only one baby has survived.
This was just the latest example this summer of seemingly well-meaning visitors ignoring the warning signs, string fencing, and requests of Connecticut Audubon staff to birds on the sandbar the room they need to survive.
Walking, birding, and taking photos on the sandbar can unnecessarily disturb the shorebirds there.
A baby Oystercatcher died of starvation and concer... (
show quote)
I have seen this type of behavior. We have to have the wildlife first and foremost in our thoughts. Please forego the great pic if you are in any way disturbing their enviroment. Respect wildlife.
Yes, it's a sad story when you just have to use common sense about basic wildlife 101. I've seen many selfish photographers who have no common sense for fellow photographers, who are on location to do exactly what every photographer is doing getting "the shot." What really kills me is that most of the photographers have expensive "show-off" super-duper zoom lenses (70-200) and are standing up in the front row or "in their face" position, spraying and praying 1,000 shots, without any consideration to the photographers around them. I would have to say out loud, "use that freaking zoom lense feature behind everyone" or "take the shot and give everyone else a chance for a decent shot," I'm not talking about a red carpet shoot, where most photographers have assigned positions. I'm talking street shooting or wild-life shooting where there's no need to hoard a position in defiance to normalcy. But I guess it's human nature and survival of the strongest to be an a**hole. Yes, these selfish photographers give the industry a bad taste.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.