joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??
Ken Wheeler is not angry nor is he a photographer, just a narcissist with a cronic case of Dunning Kruger Effect in need of psychiatric help.
vma wrote:
He knows his equipment. Opinions are emphasized & he is usually right on. Crude but I can overlook it & learn from his experience.
What prompted you to revive this thread that died a year ago?
---
They say, "Speak not ill of the dead"! I say, Speak not ill of the LIVING!
"
If y'all don't like this guy's writing, don't read his articles or view his videos. No need to "diagnose him with a psychological disorder!
Old threads never die, they just are resurrected when folks wanna post derogatory comments.
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??
His Youtube content is pure junk.
I watch Theo often. I take what he says with a grain of salt. I think he is being honest with his opinions. It wouldn't keep me from buying a Sigma, Tamron or a Nikon 28-300.
I watched Theo for a while a few years back. Not sure if what he said was correct or not, but his style is to keep repeating himself. At times I couldn't tell if he was trying to convince himself or his audience.
Many of the bloggers seem to like to repeat themselves, very similar to the weather girls on the 11 pm news. I believe them the first time they say it will rain tomorrow.
I mainly agree brings up mutch info that has validity in his turbulent mind only. RBorud
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.