Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
After Post Processing
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Aug 13, 2021 12:24:27   #
willaim Loc: Sunny Southern California
 
Yes, I definitely keep the original. There might be a time, somewhere down the road, I would make different edits. I have done that a number of times. Like legal documents and such. You never get rid of the original.

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 12:33:41   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
Howard5252 wrote:
After running your photos through whatever post processing needed to be done and have decided upon which to keep, do you also save the original photo of the keepers? Just curious.


Yes
May want to change changes…

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 12:48:27   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Howard5252 wrote:
...do you also save the original photo?...


Yes... Always!

I even save some of the "non" keepers. Sometimes I go back and find that I can do something with them. Other times I've had situations where a part of one image could be used to fix a flaw in another image. For example, if I get a great shot but someone's eyes were closed, I may be able to copy and paste their eyes from another photo.

I keep the originals in case I want to make changes later... perhaps try a different way of post-processing.

If anything, I'd throw away the post-processed copy. I can always make another of those. The originals, on the other hand, cannot be replaced without going out and reshooting, which is seldom even possible.

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Aug 13, 2021 12:53:19   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
Howard5252 wrote:
After running your photos through whatever post processing needed to be done and have decided upon which to keep, do you also save the original photo of the keepers? Just curious.


I ALWAYS keep the originals. I never know at the moment what I might want to do with it at a later time. I'd rather have it than wish I did.

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 13:08:14   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
YES!
If for no other reason, I often find a Picture-Within-a-Picture.

Some object I might crop out could become its own picture.

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 13:20:51   #
redlegfrog
 
Real Nikon Lover wrote:
My workflow includes this:

I shoot in RAW and JPG and back up all originals on 3 drives.

I create a main folder with three sub-folders.

Main folder nomenclature=Event Name/Topic+Date ex: Christmas-25 Dec 2021
In the main folder are sub folders named: RAW, JPG, PP (post processed)

For posting/emailing I create a folder in PP called "Small" and place resized photos (under 8 megs) in order to meet size requirements for email and many websites.

I have never "culled" my digital folders because once in awhile I go back and find a keeper I didn't realize was hidden in the mix or surprisingly looked amazing after cropping and post processing.

BTW I am beginning to read about and put together an "Unraid" system. Following Joseph Cristina's book that outlines "How to Create a Digital Fort Knox". This little book is worth its weight in gold for a non-technoid like me.

REF: ISBN 9781737506607
My workflow includes this: br br I shoot in RAW a... (show quote)


I like you idea with folders! Mind if I borrow it?

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 13:32:42   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Real Nikon Lover wrote:
...I create a main folder with three sub-folders.

Main folder nomenclature=Event Name/Topic+Date ex: Christmas-25 Dec 2021
In the main folder are sub folders named: RAW, JPG, PP (post processed)...


I do something similar. Main folder name = Event name. Only two sub folders: RAW and JPG for original files. Post processed jpgs go in the main folder. That's where my family has the best chance of finding them.

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/user-page?upnum=1584

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Aug 13, 2021 14:21:36   #
elee950021 Loc: New York, NY
 
Howard5252 wrote:
After running your photos through whatever post-processing needed to be done and have decided upon which to keep, do you also save the original photo of the keepers? Just curious.


I started my digital shooting in the early 2000s with 6MP and later 10-12MP Nikon DSLR cameras and have many keepers and signature images from those days. With today's AI software with new features, I can improve them in terms of composition, dynamic range, resolution and reduced noise. In hindsight, I sometimes cringe at images that I'd over-process and have since developed different feelings about them.

Obviously, shots of my feet, misfocused and extremely underexposed images are discarded.

Be well! Ed

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 16:28:47   #
Bogin Bob Loc: Tampa Bay, Florida
 
1. Keep all RAW images - a) that have been processed or b) have the potential for future processing
2. Keep all images exported as Jpeg (since I shared those once, I probably will share again ... oh, external disk space is cheap
3. Images saved on the computer as Jpeg's are auto-saved to Google Photos using Backup and Save for future sharing

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 17:28:20   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Howard5252 wrote:
After running your photos through whatever post processing needed to be done and have decided upon which to keep, do you also save the original photo of the keepers? Just curious.


Yes, always.

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 17:51:13   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Howard5252 wrote:
After running your photos through whatever post processing needed to be done and have decided upon which to keep, do you also save the original photo of the keepers? Just curious.


I save the originals for a while. A few months maybe. Then I discard them. Unlike some people, I don't re-edit the same images over and over again, stretching out over years. When I feel confident that the processing is complete, I don't need the originals anymore. Why save them beyond that point?

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Aug 13, 2021 19:34:09   #
Photocraig
 
larryepage wrote:
Did you discard your negatives after making your prints?


Exactly. I still have about 10 Arcival Boxes of negs and slides from the film DAZE. Just need a scanner and some motivation and some time.
But at 77, I'm still young yet!
C

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 20:00:35   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Photocraig wrote:
Exactly. I still have about 10 Arcival Boxes of negs and slides from the film DAZE. Just need a scanner and some motivation and some time.
But at 77, I'm still young yet!
C


Check out my white paper. It’s a PDF that opens in your browser when you click the download.

Attached file:
(Download)

Reply
Aug 13, 2021 20:38:17   #
redlegfrog
 
burkphoto wrote:
Check out my white paper. It’s a PDF that opens in your browser when you click the download.


I read your white paper and enjoyed it.

Thank you,

Tom

Reply
Aug 14, 2021 00:34:04   #
dds48
 
As my Photoshop skills improved over the years I have found I can go back to old photos and improve on the original.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.