Well, as I search for a fisheye lens (shame on me), perhaps I should consider a Sigma instead of a Canon.
I purchased a Sigma 150-600 Zoom recently and I love it. Much less than the Canon equivalent. There are those who say the Canon is better - perhaps it is; but is it $2000 better? I would never know because I wouldn’t/couldn’t buy it.
MgL
Loc: Chiba, Japan and San Francisco
Canon 400, f5.6 just under $1000 on Amazon. Great lens.
I've found that Sigma produces a worthy line of lenses. You could rent to try before you buy.
elliott937 wrote:
Well, as I search for a fisheye lens (shame on me), perhaps I should consider a Sigma instead of a Canon.
brooklyn-camera I wrote:
All my lenses cost $250-$300, if you don't believe me just ask the wife.
Hey! If you tell her that is what they cost, I will NOT challenge you! In fact, if you need a counterfeit receipt, let me know!
Reasonable rates.
The receipt will read "WYSDK Photo Inc."
WYSDK = "What Your Spouse Don't Know"
I will make it look believable. For an extra (not so reasonable) fee, I will even provide a link to a site showing that Canon 500mm lens at $250.00!
However, I do not testify at divorce proceedings.
If it gets to that point, you are on your own!
The Sigma 50-500? Please learn to use "Quote Reply"
Nalu
Loc: Southern Arizona
Spend your children’s inheritance. That’s what I did. On a positive note, keep in mind that the much of the top notch glass will hold value if you change your mind down the road. So what you are spending is the difference in new vs used, and you get value of using the gear in the mean time. Good luck!
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
fjdarling wrote:
Some of us buy used gear from reputable sources. "Refurb" gear is the same as used - but is usually repackaged.
Your definition may be too narrow but is probably correct some of the time.
Let me add this absolutely true thought. If/when you purchase from your local camera store, used can be as good as new. And should you find it flawed, during its "trial time", they will kindly take it back.
Schiller's Camera Store here in St. Louis is a living example of that.
elliott937 wrote:
Let me add this absolutely true thought. If/when you purchase from your local camera store, used can be as good as new. And should you find it flawed, during its "trial time", they will kindly take it back.
Schiller's Camera Store here in St. Louis is a living example of that.
What local camera store??? Samys in San Francisco & Glazer's in Seattle are the last ones I've been to in about 7 years.
I use and absolutely trust B&H in NYC... one of the ones you mentioned above has advertised canon below "blessed" price (greymarket) and not so stated.. Last thing I bought from B&H was a second hand flash, perfect condx except where that had marked it with paint, presumable to mark it as used.
What you like to take pictures of has everything to do with the cost lenses you need. Be it landscapes,, sports, weddings, portraits, macro, distant birds in flight, etc. etc. lots of u-tube videos that will narrow things down a bit for you. Also don't forget to factor in the cost of the flash depending on what you like to shoot.
Cheryl, it's quite simple. Save for it. That requires some sacrifice but can be worth it. The other path is to look for good quality used equipment. That can save you some money.
The biggest question to ask, though, is do I really need this?
--Bob
blackwc2 wrote:
Hi, I am new to the site.
I was just wondering how you all afford the price of lenses?
Would really like 400, or 600 mm
Lenses but $12,000.00.......
How?
CHG_CANON wrote:
Everyone's heart has a secret nerve that responds to the touch of new camera equipment.
I am afraid the secret nerve I have is the negative "ouch" I get when I have to lift out too much cash from my wallet. You can buy 4 Chevy's for the price on 1 Cadillac. The Cadillac may be better in some (mostly cosmetic) ways, but is it 4 times better ???
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.