This SOB belongs in prison
Apr 20, 2021 18:30:41 #
Frum: He did invite them. I heard and read his invitation. I do trust my sources as much as you trust yours. I am inclined to respond to you and others as you treat me.
Apr 21, 2021 18:33:01 #
Texcaster wrote:
‘It’s almost like insanity’: GOP base continues to... (show quote)
Australian Trump love on display, folks. Pitiful.
Apr 21, 2021 18:33:54 #
Apr 21, 2021 18:36:52 #
FrumCA wrote:
Sure you didn't. Your credibility is non-existent. Here's the original:
Texie hates America and especially the American flag.
Apr 22, 2021 14:38:21 #
trainspotter
Loc: Oregon
cwp3420 wrote:
Texie hates America and especially the American flag.
Viet Nam fried his brain....
Apr 22, 2021 14:58:58 #
Maxine Water's comments were deliberately inciteful...encouraging even more violence than has already happened.
"We've got to stay on the street and we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business."
How much more confrontational...how many more buildings need to be burned...how many more cops need to be assaulted or shot...how many more cars need to be burned?
Her comments were more inciteful than anything trump said in his Jan 6 speech. He was inciteful, but he did not cross any line to actually encourage violence...he chose his words carefully...he sent his inciteful message without using inciteful words. He was impeached for it.
Yet the Dem leaders that impeached trump are falling all over themselves to excuse and minimize what Mad Max uttered.
Shame on them.
She should at a minimum be censured...a minimum.
Yet the Dems lined up in lockstep with Pelosi to block the effort to do so.
Shame on them.
"We've got to stay on the street and we've got to get more active, we've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business."
How much more confrontational...how many more buildings need to be burned...how many more cops need to be assaulted or shot...how many more cars need to be burned?
Her comments were more inciteful than anything trump said in his Jan 6 speech. He was inciteful, but he did not cross any line to actually encourage violence...he chose his words carefully...he sent his inciteful message without using inciteful words. He was impeached for it.
Yet the Dem leaders that impeached trump are falling all over themselves to excuse and minimize what Mad Max uttered.
Shame on them.
She should at a minimum be censured...a minimum.
Yet the Dems lined up in lockstep with Pelosi to block the effort to do so.
Shame on them.
Apr 22, 2021 15:11:32 #
Her remarks were not nearly as inciteful.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
Apr 22, 2021 15:31:01 #
CWGordon wrote:
Her remarks were not nearly as inciteful.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
Which of his words were more inciteful?
Apr 22, 2021 15:42:01 #
Wuligal
Loc: Slippery Rock, Pa.
[quote=Leon S]Yes it is. A lot of this started with the election of Sen. Wellstone.
Thank you again Leon S. for keeping us apprised of what is happening in your state. If you get tired of the "flack" you might get with a public message please feel free to PM me because I have a genuine interest in what is going on in this nation. There's not a lot I can do to change it but that doesn't mean I don't care.
Thanks again........
Thank you again Leon S. for keeping us apprised of what is happening in your state. If you get tired of the "flack" you might get with a public message please feel free to PM me because I have a genuine interest in what is going on in this nation. There's not a lot I can do to change it but that doesn't mean I don't care.
Thanks again........
Apr 22, 2021 15:45:49 #
CWGordon wrote:
Her remarks were not nearly as inciteful.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
She didn’t invite people/radicals
She is a Congresswomen, not a president.
She hadn’t fired ‘em up for 5 years
She didn’t lie to them.
She didn’t step up the rhetoric last few months.
There was no riot after her remarks.
I do still wish she hadn’t said some of those things, but still say her rhetoric was far less inciting than was DJT’s.
What kind of dream world do you live in?
Apr 22, 2021 17:02:36 #
Leon and mwalsh: I live in the world I “see and hear” as opposed to just listening to Hannity or someone similar or further right.
Apr 22, 2021 17:29:39 #
CWGordon wrote:
Leon and mwalsh: I live in the world I “see and hear” as opposed to just listening to Hannity or someone similar or further right.
Obviously you’re blind and deaf then.
Apr 22, 2021 18:16:19 #
CWGordon wrote:
Leon and mwalsh: I live in the world I “see and hear” as opposed to just listening to Hannity or someone similar or further right.
All I did was politely ask which of trump's words you found to be more inciteful than Max Waters inciteful words.
You have been badgering fotoartist about not answering a question...would you care to respond to mine?
You don't have to. I won't badger you about it.
But another question: why would you lump me in with Leon in that rejoinder? I have very little in common with that particular poster.
I do not watch hannity...can't abide the blowhard and his bs.
Apr 22, 2021 19:09:42 #
mwalsh wrote:
Maxine Water's comments were deliberately incitefu... (show quote)
Monte - "Her comments were more inciteful than anything trump said in his Jan 6 speech."
Trump is infinitely more au fait with le dog whistle. Well practiced after years of gathering his horde and keeping them on-side and revved up.
It's all in the little book ... "Rules for Tremendous Orange Demagogues" by Joe McCarthy and Roy Cohn
Apr 22, 2021 19:13:46 #
mwalsh: my apologies, really.
I read so many nasty and rude posts I just don’t feel the warm fuzzies, ya know what I mean?
Re: Inciteful posts my position is that I express an opinion and don’t feel anything I say will only be disparaged by the folks on the other political side. If someone disagrees with me, I think they have the right to express their opinion. I have no burden. The burden is their if they have a FACTUAL disagreement.
I have badgered Foto to answer my question. He has been very insulting and if he wishes to not answer he could and should say that. He has refused to just answer by trying to dodge the question through varying means. If someone wants to deal with me on a respectful or disrespectful manner, I will base my general tone based on that.
It is a political disagreement, but I do not believe her statements were as inciting as were his. I stated my reasons. I listened to both and the environment and totality of the circumstances and stand by my beliefs. I believe that FotoGuy is an adult and that he is capable of being abrasive and is capable of standing up for himself. Just my opinion.
I do appreciate your post and its’ tone.
I read so many nasty and rude posts I just don’t feel the warm fuzzies, ya know what I mean?
Re: Inciteful posts my position is that I express an opinion and don’t feel anything I say will only be disparaged by the folks on the other political side. If someone disagrees with me, I think they have the right to express their opinion. I have no burden. The burden is their if they have a FACTUAL disagreement.
I have badgered Foto to answer my question. He has been very insulting and if he wishes to not answer he could and should say that. He has refused to just answer by trying to dodge the question through varying means. If someone wants to deal with me on a respectful or disrespectful manner, I will base my general tone based on that.
It is a political disagreement, but I do not believe her statements were as inciting as were his. I stated my reasons. I listened to both and the environment and totality of the circumstances and stand by my beliefs. I believe that FotoGuy is an adult and that he is capable of being abrasive and is capable of standing up for himself. Just my opinion.
I do appreciate your post and its’ tone.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.