Pentony wrote:
Why have 3 bodies with completely different controls???
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Why not? I have the d90 and 3100. I'm planing on acquiring the d5100. Just waiting to see if there will be a d5200 because I purchased the d3100 three months unknown (before) the d3200 came out.
Anyway, I'm retired. All my children are adults with their immediate families and all are doing well. So to spend my money my choice is to either frequent bars, chase women and have nothing to show for my expense or spend my money on photography, travelling and volunteering which gives me pleasure and something to show for my time and expense.
Your opinion on how I or anyone else spends money and a dollar will buy me a cup of coffee. 8-)
AND I choose to no longer have a wife to drive me further into unnecessary debt.
"Why have 3 bodies with completely different controls?"
Each body is unique for different photographic situations. Having different controls challenges my mind. Keeping my mind active reduces the possibility of Alzheimer.
So I'll buy as many cameras bodies as I want. It's my money and is not to be questioned. :lol:
The original question was choosing between the d3100 vs the d5100 not "why a third body." :twisted:
In answer to the original question, d3100 vs d5100? I recommend the d5100. Even with the higher mpx's of the d3200, I still recommend the d5100.
With hind sight, knowing what I know now, I would have purchased the d5100 with two kit lens, then the d90 with two kit lens, then the d3200 body, then the Coolpix p510, and then some prime lens like the 85mm, the 50mm, the 105mm and the 24mm. See I have lots of equipment to buy. :-P :-P[/quote]
And you have a blast spending your money! Sounds like so much fun.