Macro lens
Mar 1, 2021 08:32:09 #
I read a post in this forum of new Z lenses coming from Nikon in 2021. I shoot with a Nikon Z6 and have three Z lenses at present; 14-30, 24-70 and 85 (the latter which is stupendous).
I miss my macro from my DSLR days and am anxious to get 'back in the game'. It's the close focusing that I love about the macro. I don't do bugs and stuff. I will acquire a macro but am not certain of the focal length. On my DSLR I had the Tamron f/2.8 90 mm. I used a crop sensor camera and therefore my lens converted to 135mm. Since I never used that lens for anything but close up and photographing my wife's art work (maximum distance was 6 feet), the reach was not used. A long introduction to my query:
If Nikon releases both a 60mm and a 90mm, what are the factors to consider with respect to the focal length most appropriate for me?
Thank you
I miss my macro from my DSLR days and am anxious to get 'back in the game'. It's the close focusing that I love about the macro. I don't do bugs and stuff. I will acquire a macro but am not certain of the focal length. On my DSLR I had the Tamron f/2.8 90 mm. I used a crop sensor camera and therefore my lens converted to 135mm. Since I never used that lens for anything but close up and photographing my wife's art work (maximum distance was 6 feet), the reach was not used. A long introduction to my query:
If Nikon releases both a 60mm and a 90mm, what are the factors to consider with respect to the focal length most appropriate for me?
Thank you
Mar 1, 2021 08:34:40 #
Surprised that you are not considering the Nikkor 105mm with an FTZ adapter. It's a really fine macro and also great for portraiture...
Mar 1, 2021 08:49:55 #
Working distance is a consideration. I got a 60mm Nikon micro, and the working distance was so short that at maximum magnification I was so close to the subject I couldn't use the lens hood. I replaced it with a 105mm.
Mar 1, 2021 09:39:18 #
If all you want is a little closer focusing, for less than $50 you can get a third party extension tube set for use with your 85mm that will maintain autofocus and aperture control. They are just empty tubes, so if you have a quality lens it will still be a quality lens after a little extension.
Mar 2, 2021 04:37:17 #
nikon123 wrote:
I read a post in this forum of new Z lenses coming... (show quote)
Shorter lenses are useful for copy work and some close ups. Longer lenses provide greater working distances and more flexibility with lighting as a result. The magnification will still be the same - 1:1 at nearest focus distance, provided it is a true macro.
Mar 2, 2021 05:23:23 #
nikon123 wrote:
I read a post in this forum of new Z lenses coming... (show quote)
Yes, but did Nikon ever release a 90mm Micro lens? They seem sold on 60mm, 105mm and 200mm for Micros. I have the 60mmD and 105mmD and each is among the sharpest lenses I have ever owned. 60 makes a great "normal", 105 makes a great "portrait lens", too.
Mar 2, 2021 05:54:23 #
tcthome
Loc: NJ
nikon123 wrote:
I read a post in this forum of new Z lenses coming... (show quote)
I read they are coming out with 60 & 105 micro lens. Longer would be better in my opinion. Lens to be announced link below. The 60 mm will get you almost 1/2 the minimum focus distance closer if the specs on the F mount lens are any indication. This might not be that important if your not doing insects. The 105mm will also have more use as a portrait lens too. If Nikon had a 200 mm macro available when I purchased the 105, I would of purchased it instead of the 105.
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/camera-lenses/mirrorless-lenses/overview.page
Mar 2, 2021 06:04:23 #
tcthome wrote:
... If Nikon had a 200 mm macro available when I purchased the 105, I would of purchased it instead of the 105.
Not sure when you got your 105, but did you not know about this one?
https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/200mm-micro.htm
Mar 2, 2021 06:30:40 #
cameraf4 wrote:
Not sure when you got your 105, but did you not know about this one?
https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/200mm-micro.htm
https://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/200mm-micro.htm
They are very rare but one just sold on here a few days ago. Asking price was 1200.00. I would have bought it if I had not just purchased the 105 mm 6months ago.
Mar 2, 2021 07:48:32 #
tcthome wrote:
I read they are coming out with 60 & 105 micro... (show quote)
You seem to not understand the concept. Yes the 60mm will get closer but the 105mm will give the same magnification without needing to be as close. The longer lens is actually preferable for insects as it provides more working distance.
Mar 2, 2021 09:06:23 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
Depending on the use. I have a 100mm Canon (Tamron has one that is rated higher). The shorter ones you must get close and with live creatures it's hard. The 180mm gives you a long distance, my son has one for butterflies and that great. So it's what you use will be.
Mar 2, 2021 09:33:01 #
As regards camera shake/blur when used hand held on a static subject and without VR, the 60 will be better.
.
.
Mar 2, 2021 09:42:22 #
Thank you all fir your comments on my post titled Macro. It seems that the best approach for my needs would be to acquire
An extension tube which I understand will provide closer focus than I can presently achieve on my Z 85 lens. I purchased said lens for its use in portraiture but soon realized that an f/1.8 lens was a gem, useful for a host of other photographic pursuits. I do like taking photos of flowers and require close focus and shallow depth of field for that. Close focus would also permit selective focus I believe. Well, I’m off to the computer to emIl my ‘guy’ at Downtown Camera in Toronto to inquire about an extendion tube.
An extension tube which I understand will provide closer focus than I can presently achieve on my Z 85 lens. I purchased said lens for its use in portraiture but soon realized that an f/1.8 lens was a gem, useful for a host of other photographic pursuits. I do like taking photos of flowers and require close focus and shallow depth of field for that. Close focus would also permit selective focus I believe. Well, I’m off to the computer to emIl my ‘guy’ at Downtown Camera in Toronto to inquire about an extendion tube.
Mar 2, 2021 10:25:53 #
nikon123 wrote:
I read a post in this forum of new Z lenses coming... (show quote)
Take a look at the Sigma 150, F2.8 macro lens. A great lens.
Mar 2, 2021 10:45:44 #
The Nikon 200mm f4 macro is a fantastic lens but Nikon stopped making it. I own it and use it all the time.
If manual focus is an option for you, consider the Irix 150mm f2.8 macro lens. It comes with a tripod collar mount like the Nikon 200mm. You will need to see if it work on your Nikon Z body. I am sure you will need an adapter. Lens costs around $600 or less.
Getting closer with your existing Z mount lenses means you need an extension tube. My friends who own Z bodies have bought Meike MK-Z-AF1 11mm and 18mm Extension Tubes for Nikon Z.
If manual focus is an option for you, consider the Irix 150mm f2.8 macro lens. It comes with a tripod collar mount like the Nikon 200mm. You will need to see if it work on your Nikon Z body. I am sure you will need an adapter. Lens costs around $600 or less.
Getting closer with your existing Z mount lenses means you need an extension tube. My friends who own Z bodies have bought Meike MK-Z-AF1 11mm and 18mm Extension Tubes for Nikon Z.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.