Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why do camera manufacturers insist on providing both still and video capabilities?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 12 next> last>>
Mar 1, 2021 08:54:15   #
Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina
 
Because I suspect it is largely just software to add video capabilities. So why not offer it as a feature. If you don’t need a capability then ignore it...simple.

Urnst wrote:
I wonder why they don't focus on one or the other. I never use video, and some probably never use still. Perhaps if manufacturers concentrated on one of the two functions they could develop better products. I appreciate any input you may offer.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 08:58:34   #
Urnst Loc: Brownsville, Texas
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The 2020 stats are saying 14.8 million digital cameras were sold worldwide. Probably when you buy a million of them, you'll have a 'voice' as a customer. Of course, you will have bought a million units all with video capabilities, so it will be hard to clarify your voice on how much you don't want video included.


I guess so. Thanks for enlightening me!

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 09:38:58   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
I wonder why it's just video capabilities some people object to. I never hear anyone saying they never do HDR and they wish their camera didn't have it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2021 09:39:03   #
Dikdik Loc: Winnipeg, Canada
 
It's a feature that has little added cost, appeals to a bunch of people, and can be implimented in the camera firmware.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 09:44:01   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
I wonder why it's just video capabilities some people object to. I never hear anyone saying they never do HDR and they wish their camera didn't have it.


Reply
Mar 1, 2021 10:03:14   #
pecohen Loc: Central Maine
 
bleirer wrote:
They do specialize as well. Canon for example makes cinema cameras. But it probably costs very little to add video to a still camera or to a phone. It's the same sensor and a subset of the same shutter system, so mostly a software issue. Broaden the appeal without increasing production costs much: win, win. I don't shoot much video, but enjoy knowing I can shoot the family singing happy birthday to grandma if I wanted.

https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/list/cameras/cinema-eos
They do specialize as well. Canon for example make... (show quote)


Right. It costs very little to add video - no doubt less than the cost of designing, marketing and stocking a second camera for the few who want to avoid having video capability.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 10:10:46   #
Cookie223 Loc: New Jersey
 
For the same reason cell phones have cameras.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2021 10:18:47   #
radiojohn
 
Agreed that is costs very little more to add video and reduces (rapidly changing) inventory. May also help pick up a few (ahem) younger buyers who do YouTube unboxings, etc.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 10:55:17   #
utahpete
 
I’m with you 100%.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 11:10:06   #
delder Loc: Maryland
 
I personally have found it useful to take a VIDEO of a fast happening or sporadic event to "Catch the Moment'.

Sometimes ANY picture is better than a missed opportunity.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 11:10:49   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
When we read stories about successful photographers, have you noticed how often they begin with a new camera with new features?

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2021 11:21:54   #
kufengler Loc: Meridian, Idaho 83646
 
Cookie223 wrote:
For the same reason cell phones have cameras.


Why do we still call them "Cell Phones"? In reality they are pocket computers.
I see more people checking their FB, Instagram, Twitter accounts, texting, taking pictures or buying something from Amazon or one of the hundreds of other online merchants, than actually talking on the device.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 12:10:24   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
kufengler wrote:
Why do we still call them "Cell Phones"? In reality they are pocket computers.
I see more people checking their FB, Instagram, Twitter accounts, texting, taking pictures or buying something from Amazon or one of the hundreds of other online merchants, than actually talking on the device.

They started out as only cellular phones, that's all you could do on them, make/receive phone calls.
Then someone improved them a bit.
It has to do with the structure of the "cellular" communication system that was developed for them.

The name stuck, and will be there for a long time.
Primary function: phone.
Secondary function: everything else.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 12:16:24   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I see everyone using their phones for video than using a camera.

I use my phone for video tours to send to posible tenants. It's easier than my camera.
Because my camera can not send emails or text.

Reply
Mar 1, 2021 12:20:14   #
BebuLamar
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
I wonder why it's just video capabilities some people object to. I never hear anyone saying they never do HDR and they wish their camera didn't have it.


Not just the video. I wish my camera doesn't have live view or the exposure compensation, or P or S mode. My camera doesn't have scenes mode nor built in flash and I don't want them either.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.