49south wrote:
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0YGKi7tL?pd=077DHroO&lang=en_US&s=i0
To be expected from a ho.
49south wrote:
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0YGKi7tL?pd=077DHroO&lang=en_US&s=i0
This catastrophe was liberals choice. Now we all live with it until she unseats Biden. Then we're screwed.
lol!
After what just happened to America, the UHH Trumpista Patriots clutch their pearls over ... a ... photo shoot???
To quote Xavier Herbert ... "Poor Fellow My Country"
Kraken wrote:
Why would you post this?
Because it is appropriate you have no knowledge
usnpilot wrote:
Because it is appropriate you have no knowledge
I'm pretty sure I know why this was posted --
To provoke some additional W.M.B. Humor --
These folks are only a post or two away from re-chanting "LOCK-HER-UP" again ------
Kraken wrote:
Why would you post this?
Let's see in my opinion and observation Krackhead is all happy to post negative articles of Trump but when it comes to Demoncrat Harris he breaks down and cries. One way streets are fun to watch especially when someone is going in the wrong direction.
Remove the venue, remove who she is, comment on the two photos the digital with a blue jacket and the full body shot. If just a Jane Smith in the UHH People Photo Section the "Print version" is poor photography compared to the "Digital Subscription version." Our job as photographers is to do a positive job of presentation, the vogue photographer and editors did not do a good job. My guess is they chose the clothing and shoes with political bias. Solid color sneakers, fine, but the ones chosen.. yuck. There the shoes are the message that the editors are making. Predigest, and political-bias?
Vogue is about style... Popular Mechanics Magazine would have done a better job.
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2142132995862/kamala-harris-was-photographed-wearing-chucks-for-her-vogue-cover-the-internet-is-not-pleased
soba1 wrote:
Truth is truth
But your "truths" appear to be exaggerations of fabrications based on prejudice and bigotry.
Kamala didn't pick the picture. The one(s) she liked weren't posted.
The art director who "fixed" the photo didn't want her to look too "black".
Half the people on this forum could have done 5 minutes of color grading and "fixed" this mess.
The so called "media frenzy" isn't against Kamala- it's against bad judgement against Vogue.
But who cares?
You have a need to deflect away from the Great Red Slime, and anything will do.
Harry0 wrote:
But your "truths" appear to be exaggerations of fabrications based on prejudice and bigotry.
Kamala didn't pick the picture. The one(s) she liked weren't posted.
The art director who "fixed" the photo didn't want her to look too "black".
Half the people on this forum could have done 5 minutes of color grading and "fixed" this mess.
The so called "media frenzy" isn't against Kamala- it's against bad judgement against Vogue.
But who cares?
You have a need to deflect away from the Great Red Slime, and anything will do.
But your "truths" appear to be exaggerat... (
show quote)
When their hero is going down the toilet and they can't defend him they use diversion.
49south wrote:
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0YGKi7tL?pd=077DHroO&lang=en_US&s=i0
The photo shoot of this Ho would have been far better photographed by Hustler Magazine with an endorsement by Willie Brown.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.