GySgt wrote:
The way it was explained to me from Nat Geo Photographer, when you shot in RAW you are getting the full picture, just as the eye has seen it. In JPEG. the camera does some of the processing and what you get is what you get. With a RAW photo and have the proper Programs. Lightroom/Photoshop. you can do a lot more with the RAW image.
You don't really need it though. Don't let them fool you.