I think I've just coined, though partially borrowed from elsewhere, a term for those who avoid processing, for whatever reason. It's akin to shooting film and letting Walgreens do the processing... drugstore photographer. --Bob
This discussion seems to be endless. Seldom did anybody take a shot where everything was perfect. Most of it was sheer luck of being at the right place at the right time, which is seldom. All the GREAT’s manipulated their shots at one way or another. What used to take place in the darkroom, is now taking place in front of the screen. I am 100% sure that this will not be the last time this exercise in futility will take place on this forum. IMHO WJH
This discussion seems to be endless. Seldom did anybody take a shot where everything was perfect. Most of it was sheer luck of being at the right place at the right time, which is seldom. All the GREAT’s manipulated their shots at one way or another. What used to take place in the darkroom, is now taking place in front of the screen. I am 100% sure that this will not be the last time this exercise in futility will take place on this forum. IMHO WJH
I see no reason to shoot jpeg except news shooting where you are uploading right away for the press. You never want to start out limiting yourself. One can always make a jpeg, you can't go backwards and make a raw from a jpeg.
I see no reason to shoot jpeg except news shooting where you are uploading right away for the press. You never want to start out limiting yourself. One can always make a jpeg, you can't go backwards and make a raw from a jpeg.
Well that's it settled then. Where were you on page 1?