Michigan Secretary of State says armed protesters gathered outside her home
Dec 8, 2020 17:06:39 #
[quote=yhtomit]That would be unconstitutional. 1st and 2nd....[/quot
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.
Dec 8, 2020 17:10:18 #
Kraken wrote:
That is a really dumb reply.
Stop before you lose all credibility.
Stop before you lose all credibility.
Krackers, I don't want any credibility with you, your liking my posts would be a clear indication that I would be suffering from dementia.
Dec 8, 2020 17:12:18 #
Frank T wrote:
br br I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Jus... (show quote)
Ol' Article 25 Frank talking about the constitution, you never cease to amaze me, however in this instance you are right, as Scalia noted in the Heller decision.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 8, 2020 17:12:41 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Krackers, I don't want any credibility with you, your liking my posts would be a clear indication that I would be suffering from dementia.
You are, you are.
Dec 8, 2020 17:14:26 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Bill 45 wrote:
As for the Trump supporter, he or she calling for violence to overturn the vote of the people is finding out that violence is a two way street.
So you are OK with bombing those you disagree with.
Dec 8, 2020 17:15:31 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
[quote=Frank T][quote=yhtomit]That would be unconstitutional. 1st and 2nd....[/quot
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Read a book.
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Read a book.
Dec 8, 2020 17:30:52 #
LWW wrote:
Read a book.
Hew LW, speaking of books, have you finished See John Run?
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Dec 8, 2020 17:49:26 #
[quote=Frank T][quote=yhtomit]That would be unconstitutional. 1st and 2nd....[/quot
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Riiiiight...just look what was done with free and fair elections. Got one? Had one lately?
No comrade frankty, the 2nd says “shall not be infringed”...that’s all...
The open carrying of firearms was an expression....1st Amendment.
Go take your sheeple dip, your way over due and getting ripe. Heck take a double dip...
I didn't know you were a Supreme Court Justice but even so, I would argue that point.
All rights in the Constitution have limitations. You have freedom of speech but you can't liable someone or shout fire in a crowded theater. You have freedom of the press, but you can't use that press to slander people.
Why should you have the right to bear arms without restrictions? There are already restrictions on it. You can't own a machine gun without a federal permit. You can't mount guns on your private airplane, or possess a firearm on school property in most states or openly carry a firearm with some exceptions, like hunting.
The list can go on and on but you think that the one right that should have no restrictions is the right to bear arms.
No wonder you're a trump supporter. It usually goes hand in hand with a low IQ.[/quote]
Riiiiight...just look what was done with free and fair elections. Got one? Had one lately?
No comrade frankty, the 2nd says “shall not be infringed”...that’s all...
The open carrying of firearms was an expression....1st Amendment.
Go take your sheeple dip, your way over due and getting ripe. Heck take a double dip...
Dec 8, 2020 18:55:46 #
Frank T wrote:
With that many guns on-site, all it takes is one shot and you'll be in the middle of a massive firefight. The real question I ask is why are people taking guns to a peaceful demonstration? Obviously, it's intimidation or perhaps in some rare cases, hoping they'll get a chance to shoot someone.
Perhaps a law prohibiting the carrying of firearms at demonstrations needs to be enacted and these combat wannabes should be thrown in jail and their weapons melted into sewer caps.
Perhaps a law prohibiting the carrying of firearms at demonstrations needs to be enacted and these combat wannabes should be thrown in jail and their weapons melted into sewer caps.
How about a law prohibiting looting and violence at demonstrations? Oh wait!
Dec 8, 2020 18:58:03 #
papakatz45 wrote:
How about a law prohibiting looting and violence at demonstrations? Oh wait!
Don't be cute, it just isn't you.
Dec 8, 2020 18:59:35 #
Texcaster wrote:
That's a glib and dumb thing to say.
Meanwhile the US becomes more and more accustomed to seeing well armed wannabees, in camo cosplay,
prancing around the place like they're somehow important.
Meanwhile the US becomes more and more accustomed to seeing well armed wannabees, in camo cosplay,
prancing around the place like they're somehow important.
Let's see, well armed wannabes on the right with peaceful protest. Unarmed wannabes on the left with looting, rioting and destruction. Which do you prefer?
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Dec 8, 2020 19:00:13 #
Kraken wrote:
That is a really dumb reply.
Stop before you lose all credibility.
Stop before you lose all credibility.
The peanut gallery has spoken.
Dec 8, 2020 19:01:25 #
Dec 8, 2020 19:04:20 #
papakatz45 wrote:
Let's see, well armed wannabes on the right with peaceful protest. Unarmed wannabes on the left with looting, rioting and destruction. Which do you prefer?
Just a bunch of well-armed wannabes on the right just itching
to try out their overpowered guns on fellow Americans.
What a bunch of LOSERS
Dec 8, 2020 19:30:22 #
Kraken wrote:
Just a bunch of well-armed wannabes on the right just itching
to try out their overpowered guns on fellow Americans.
What a bunch of LOSERS
to try out their overpowered guns on fellow Americans.
What a bunch of LOSERS
Can you show any case of "well-armed wannabes" demonstrators who have shot any one or rioted, or destroyed property, or looted, or taken over city blocks? Or have you seen this from left-wing supporting trash? Answer truthfully if you can. Keep in mind the "well-armed wannabes" are doing everything legally, not like your left-wing demonstrators.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.