Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Interesting Take on Electric Cars
Page <<first <prev 9 of 11 next> last>>
Dec 5, 2020 17:03:02   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
TriX wrote:
No need for new technology - as you suggest, just plant trees (and stop the continuing deforestation of the rain forests).


The ocean is even more effective at absorbing Co2 than trees. In Brazil the Amazon is being de-forested at an alarming rate. https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/10/ocean-carbon-dioxide-sequestration

Reply
Dec 5, 2020 17:08:24   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
berchman wrote:
The ocean is even more effective at absorbing Co2 than trees. In Brazil the Amazon is being de-forested at an alarming rate. https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/10/ocean-carbon-dioxide-sequestration


I agree, and we seem powerless to stop this ecological calamity.

Reply
Dec 5, 2020 23:11:16   #
JBRIII
 
Plants do it using sunlight as the energy source, i.e. the original solar power.

C + O2 = CO2 + energy, and energy + CO2 can = C + O2. Or for plants CO2 + sunlight = sugar + O2.

The problem is that C fuels are energy dense, biofuels are, take huge areas of land. The EU used large amounts of bio diesel which has resulted in losses of wildlife and forests in Asia.

No easy answer. Clean coal is suppose to capture and pump the CO2 underground, but it could escape killing everything in the area except bacteria, (happened in a volcanic lake, killing plants, animals, etc.), or lubricate the rock and causing earthquakes. Such quakes have happened due to waste pumping and tracking (Kansas).

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2020 21:34:36   #
GregWCIL Loc: Illinois
 
You might want to double check your math. Average electric rate in California is about $.15 per kw. Doubt yours are $1.16.

chase4 wrote:
Interested in what the engineers or others with knowledge and/or experience in this field have to say about this man's comments. I did not write this, it was sent by a friend. chase

As an engineer I love the electric vehicle technology. However, I
have been troubled for a longtime by the fact that the electrical
energy to keep the batteries charged has to come from the grid and that means more power generation and a huge increase in the
distribution infrastructure Whether generated from coal, gas, oil,
wind or sun, installed generation capacity is limited.

IF ELECTRIC CARS DO NOT USE GASOLINE, THEY WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN PAYING A GASOLINE TAX ON EVERY GALLON THAT IS SOLD FOR AUTOMOBILES, WHICH WAS ENACTED SOME YEARS AGO TO HELP TO MAINTAIN OUR ROADS AND BRIDGES. THEY WILL USE THE ROADS, BUT WILL NOT PAY FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE!
In case you were thinking of buying hybrid or an electric car:
Ever since the advent of electric cars, the REAL cost per mile of
those things has never been discussed. All you ever heard was the mpg in terms of gasoline, with nary a mention of the cost of electricity to run it . This is the first article I've ever seen and tells the story pretty much as I expected it to

Electricity has to be one of the least efficient ways to power things
yet they're being shoved down our throats. Glad somebody finally put engineering and math to paper.

At a neighborhood BBQ I was talking to a neighbor, a BC Hydro
Executive. I asked him how that renewable thing was doing. He laughed, then got serious.

If you really intend to adopt electric vehicles, he pointed out, you
had to face certain realities. For example, a home charging system for a Tesla requires 75 amp service. The average house is equipped with 100 amp service. On our small street (approximately 25 homes), The electrical infrastructure would be unable to carry more than three houses with a single Tesla, each. For even half the homes to have electric vehicles, the system would be wildly over-loaded.

This is the elephant in the room with electric vehicles. Our
residential infrastructure cannot bear the load So as our genius
elected officials promote this nonsense, not only are we being urged to buy these things and replace our reliable, cheap generating systems with expensive, new windmills and solar cells, but we will also have to renovate our entire delivery system! This latter "investment" will not be revealed until we're so far down this dead end road that it will be presented with an 'OOPS..!' and a shrug.

If you want to argue with a green person over cars that are
eco-friendly, just read the following Note: If you ARE a green
person, read it anyway. It's enlightening.

Eric test drove the Chevy Volt at the invitation of General Motors and he writes, "For four days in a row, the fully charged battery lasted only 25 miles before the Volt switched to the reserve gasoline engine. "Eric calculated the car got 30 mpg including the 25 miles it ran on the battery. So, the range including the 9-gallon gas tank and the 16 kwh battery is approximately 270 miles

It will take you 4.5 hours to drive 270 miles at 60 mph. Then add 10 hours to charge the battery and you have a total trip time of 14.5 hours. In a typical road trip your average speed (including charging Time) would be 20 mph. According to General Motors, the Volt battery holds 16 kwh of electricity. It takes a full 10 hours to charge a drained battery. The cost for the electricity to charge the Volt is never mentioned, so I looked up what I pay for electricity.

I pay approximately (it varies with amount used and the seasons) $1.16 per kwh. 16 kwh x $1.16 per kwh = $18.56 to charge the battery. $18.56 per charge divided by 25 miles = $0.74 per mile to operate the Volt using the battery. Compare this to a similar size car with a gasoline engine that gets only 32 mpg. $3.19 per gallon divided by 32 Mpg = $0.10 per mile.

The gasoline powered car costs about $25,000 while the Volt costs
$46,000 plus. Simply pay twice as much for a car, that costs more than seven times as much to run, and takes three times longer to drive across the country.
Interested in what the engineers or others with kn... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 6, 2020 22:02:29   #
Hamltnblue Loc: Springfield PA
 
The whole electric car movement is a house of cards. Outside the cost per kw, the rest was accurate. There are other energy losses in transmission not listed.

A couple of other items.
The life of the battery is generally similar to a cell phone. When new you go a long way after a charge. After a year or sooner you start to notice a charge doesn’t last as long. A couple of years later you’re charging twice as much or more. They just don’t last. Anyone know what it costs to replace an EV battery? Bet it’s very high on the level of replacing an engine.

What happens if you get one of the highway traffic jams we often see in the winterwhen roads ice? What happens when all cars are EV in that situation? The heaters are still running and draining batteries. After a few hours enough cars would be drained, causing a total jam requiring thousands to be rescued.

Reply
Dec 6, 2020 22:11:11   #
Hamltnblue Loc: Springfield PA
 
berchman wrote:
The ocean is even more effective at absorbing Co2 than trees. In Brazil the Amazon is being de-forested at an alarming rate. https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/10/ocean-carbon-dioxide-sequestration


I think there’s more political science going on and not real science.
Water is H2O, not H2CO.

In my time living in the ocean we never ran into co2 pockets nor did we have any indication of any.
Fish are still living to the deepest depths.
There are no hidden layers or pools of co2

Reply
Dec 6, 2020 23:15:45   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Hamltnblue wrote:
I think there’s more political science going on and not real science.
Water is H2O, not H2CO.

In my time living in the ocean we never ran into co2 pockets nor did we have any indication of any.
Fish are still living to the deepest depths.
There are no hidden layers or pools of co2


I think maybe this article from NOAA might shed some light on the subject. https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts/ocean-acidification

Rather than there being pockets of CO2, CO2 dissolves in seawater readily and is dispersed. Fish take in O2 and expel CO2 into their environment just as terrestrial animals do. In fact, aquarists inject CO2 into aquariums to promote plant growth. I believe the equation is H2O + CO2 > H2CO3 (carbonic acid) http://ion.chem.usu.edu/~sbialkow/Classes/3650/Carbonate/Carbonic%20Acid.html

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2020 23:41:04   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
Hamltnblue wrote:
The whole electric car movement is a house of cards. Outside the cost per kw, the rest was accurate. There are other energy losses in transmission not listed.

A couple of other items.
The life of the battery is generally similar to a cell phone. When new you go a long way after a charge. After a year or sooner you start to notice a charge doesn’t last as long. A couple of years later you’re charging twice as much or more. They just don’t last. Anyone know what it costs to replace an EV battery? Bet it’s very high on the level of replacing an engine.

What happens if you get one of the highway traffic jams we often see in the winterwhen roads ice? What happens when all cars are EV in that situation? The heaters are still running and draining batteries. After a few hours enough cars would be drained, causing a total jam requiring thousands to be rescued.
The whole electric car movement is a house of card... (show quote)


I believe that all EV automobiles sold in the US are mandated to have a 8 year 100,000 mile warranty on the battery. Not sure about other manufacturers, But Nissan batteries sell for between $7,900 and $10,000 depending on the capacity. I would expect that cost to come down as more are produced, but it’s not insignificant. From what I can determine, the Li Ion batteries in cars degrade less over time than a cellphone/laptop/tablet because they are not allowed to discharge as far, but I haven’t found good data on the degradation of the capacity for vehicle batteries over time - perhaps as more are in service for longer periods, we’ll get some real world data. Certainly it’s a consideration.

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 04:56:18   #
paulrph1 Loc: Washington, Utah
 
chase4 wrote:
Interested in what the engineers or others with knowledge and/or experience in this field have to say about this man's comments. I did not write this, it was sent by a friend. chase

As an engineer I love the electric vehicle technology. However, I
have been troubled for a longtime by the fact that the electrical
energy to keep the batteries charged has to come from the grid and that means more power generation and a huge increase in the
distribution infrastructure Whether generated from coal, gas, oil,
wind or sun, installed generation capacity is limited.

IF ELECTRIC CARS DO NOT USE GASOLINE, THEY WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN PAYING A GASOLINE TAX ON EVERY GALLON THAT IS SOLD FOR AUTOMOBILES, WHICH WAS ENACTED SOME YEARS AGO TO HELP TO MAINTAIN OUR ROADS AND BRIDGES. THEY WILL USE THE ROADS, BUT WILL NOT PAY FOR THEIR MAINTENANCE!
In case you were thinking of buying hybrid or an electric car:
Ever since the advent of electric cars, the REAL cost per mile of
those things has never been discussed. All you ever heard was the mpg in terms of gasoline, with nary a mention of the cost of electricity to run it . This is the first article I've ever seen and tells the story pretty much as I expected it to

Electricity has to be one of the least efficient ways to power things
yet they're being shoved down our throats. Glad somebody finally put engineering and math to paper.

At a neighborhood BBQ I was talking to a neighbor, a BC Hydro
Executive. I asked him how that renewable thing was doing. He laughed, then got serious.

If you really intend to adopt electric vehicles, he pointed out, you
had to face certain realities. For example, a home charging system for a Tesla requires 75 amp service. The average house is equipped with 100 amp service. On our small street (approximately 25 homes), The electrical infrastructure would be unable to carry more than three houses with a single Tesla, each. For even half the homes to have electric vehicles, the system would be wildly over-loaded.

This is the elephant in the room with electric vehicles. Our
residential infrastructure cannot bear the load So as our genius
elected officials promote this nonsense, not only are we being urged to buy these things and replace our reliable, cheap generating systems with expensive, new windmills and solar cells, but we will also have to renovate our entire delivery system! This latter "investment" will not be revealed until we're so far down this dead end road that it will be presented with an 'OOPS..!' and a shrug.

If you want to argue with a green person over cars that are
eco-friendly, just read the following Note: If you ARE a green
person, read it anyway. It's enlightening.

Eric test drove the Chevy Volt at the invitation of General Motors and he writes, "For four days in a row, the fully charged battery lasted only 25 miles before the Volt switched to the reserve gasoline engine. "Eric calculated the car got 30 mpg including the 25 miles it ran on the battery. So, the range including the 9-gallon gas tank and the 16 kwh battery is approximately 270 miles

It will take you 4.5 hours to drive 270 miles at 60 mph. Then add 10 hours to charge the battery and you have a total trip time of 14.5 hours. In a typical road trip your average speed (including charging Time) would be 20 mph. According to General Motors, the Volt battery holds 16 kwh of electricity. It takes a full 10 hours to charge a drained battery. The cost for the electricity to charge the Volt is never mentioned, so I looked up what I pay for electricity.

I pay approximately (it varies with amount used and the seasons) $1.16 per kwh. 16 kwh x $1.16 per kwh = $18.56 to charge the battery. $18.56 per charge divided by 25 miles = $0.74 per mile to operate the Volt using the battery. Compare this to a similar size car with a gasoline engine that gets only 32 mpg. $3.19 per gallon divided by 32 Mpg = $0.10 per mile.

The gasoline powered car costs about $25,000 while the Volt costs
$46,000 plus. Simply pay twice as much for a car, that costs more than seven times as much to run, and takes three times longer to drive across the country.
Interested in what the engineers or others with kn... (show quote)


So on a recent trip, while staying a motel, they had a few spots reserved for vehicles to recharge their autos while they slept. I could see no evidence of any place to pay for the charging of said vehicles. So who is footing the bill?

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 07:06:31   #
Bbarn Loc: Ohio
 
There could be switches for the receptacles that guests pay to have turned on.

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 08:37:05   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
Hamltnblue wrote:
The whole electric car movement is a house of cards. Outside the cost per kw, the rest was accurate. There are other energy losses in transmission not listed.

A couple of other items.
The life of the battery is generally similar to a cell phone. When new you go a long way after a charge. After a year or sooner you start to notice a charge doesn’t last as long. A couple of years later you’re charging twice as much or more. They just don’t last. Anyone know what it costs to replace an EV battery? Bet it’s very high on the level of replacing an engine.

What happens if you get one of the highway traffic jams we often see in the winterwhen roads ice? What happens when all cars are EV in that situation? The heaters are still running and draining batteries. After a few hours enough cars would be drained, causing a total jam requiring thousands to be rescued.
The whole electric car movement is a house of card... (show quote)


The real life experience of people owning and driving Teslas for a number of years show very little degradation of the batteries, nothing even close to the imaginary "charging twice as much or more." Moreover, people camping overnight in their Teslas and running the heater show at most a 1-2% loss of charge.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2020 10:51:34   #
Bbarn Loc: Ohio
 
I would think average power consumption of a heater would be at least 500W. More if very cold, less if just cool. That would translate to more than 4kWhr for a period of 8 hours. That's 4% of a 100kWhr battery. The full capacity of the heater is likely at least 4X that for initially fast heating from a cold state.

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 11:26:26   #
JBRIII
 
The equation for forming carbonic acid is correct and actually part of the problem. Add too much CO2 to the oceans and they become more acidic. This results in the carbonate in animal shells to resolve to form bicarbonate, and/or makes it harder to form such shells.

CaC03 + H2CO3 yields Ca(HCO3)2 (bicarbonate which is water soluble)

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 11:36:12   #
pendennis
 
TriX wrote:
I think maybe this article from NOAA might shed some light on the subject. https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts/ocean-acidification

Rather than there being pockets of CO2, CO2 dissolves in seawater readily and is dispersed. Fish take in O2 and expel CO2 into their environment just as terrestrial animals do. In fact, aquarists inject CO2 into aquariums to promote plant growth. I believe the equation is H2O + CO2 > H2CO3 (carbonic acid) http://ion.chem.usu.edu/~sbialkow/Classes/3650/Carbonate/Carbonic%20Acid.html
I think maybe this article from NOAA might shed so... (show quote)


Just curious, after reading the article, I wonder what the catalyst is to cause two electrically stable molecules (CO2, H2O) to merge into H2CO3? Or, is there enough of a charge in H2O to accommodate this reaction?

PS - Incoming air quality on the Pacific Coast has been measured since the 1880's. The quality of air incoming from the ocean is the same now as then. As the air crosses the U.S., the mountains "wash" the air, but never to the extent that the Pacific cleans it. After it exits the U.S., the Atlantic does the same job. This is only a rough gauge, since domestic air currents are influenced by both Arctic and tropical wind activity.

Reply
Dec 7, 2020 12:12:35   #
JBRIII
 
No catalyst needed, just how molecules react. The energy needed is low so it happens easily. Some flamable reactions are just as easy at room temperature just not coal + oxygen, unless the oxygen content is much higher or the coal is dust.
For example, methane CH4 needs a spark or such to spontaneously burn at room temps, but silicon hydride (SiH4) will ignite spontaneous in air.
Many chemical reactions for similar materials are very different and analogies can get one killed. Each element, even those with very similar chemistries, has its own properties due to the energy forces at the molecular level involved.
Now a days, the curiosity common in chemists my age shown growing up would get one visits from agencies one does not really want to know: FBI, ATF, etc. Taking about Lithium ion batteries would be a top list priority to get the Lithium.
There are enzymes (catalysts) in biological systems for the CO2 reactions, but as I remember, as rates are higher, but as much higher as caused by many enzymes.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.