Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
what should I have done
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 30, 2020 12:17:35   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
very cloudy Sunday morning about 9:20, shot through windows and the deer were about 70 feet away. I do not think these un post processed jpeg photos are sharp.
The female has an injured rear leg. They posed for about 15 minutes
Comments please.

d500 with 18 to 300 zoom at 300 mm, f10, 1/400s iso 800
d500 with 18 to 300 zoom at 300 mm, f10, 1/400s is...
(Download)

d850, 70 to 200 at 200mm, f 8, 1/250. iso 2000
d850, 70 to 200 at 200mm, f 8, 1/250. iso 2000...
(Download)

d850, 70 to 200 at 200mm, f/8 1/250, iso 2000
d850, 70 to 200 at 200mm, f/8 1/250, iso 2000...
(Download)

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 12:40:18   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
You had several very big challenges: shooting through a window, a subject that is blending in with its environment, flat lighting and nearby objects that challenge auto-focusing ability.

#3 seems to have sharpest focus on the deer, but I think overall you did really well for the conditions.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 12:44:26   #
pwrxprt Loc: Beaumont, California
 
Great captures! It appears to me that perhaps your focal point is not the "eye" of the deer. In the first two photos, the bench pretty sharp, yet the deer is a little fuzzy, and the Christmas balls are sharp. I know when I get in a hurry, this happens to me all the time. The last photo is the sharpest in my opinion. As they say, keep shooting and you'll get it perfect. Thanks for sharing and I'm envious that you get wildlife in your backyard.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 12:51:45   #
Robg
 
I like the butterfly tattoo on the stag!

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 13:28:00   #
jpgto Loc: North East Tennessee
 
Personally I think you did very well. So many interfering factors, first of all shooting through a window! Then all the other items around your subjects could have created minor focus issues.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 14:24:41   #
Bill Eaton Loc: Palm City,Florida
 
Perhaps drop 5.6 that would allow for lower
ISO and soften th background.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 14:27:18   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Bill Eaton wrote:
Perhaps drop 5.6 that would allow for lower
ISO and soften th background.
In #1 and #3 the deer is very close to, even part of, "the background." Using depth of field calculators, the distance from camera to subject vs subject to background suggests that a wider aperture would not achieve a "softer" background, but would certainly be worth a few frames to see how a lower ISO affects overall image quality

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 14:38:16   #
fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut
 
One of the most common reasons for not quite sharp images, especially with wildlife and a longer lens, is too slow a shutter speed. Try with a wider aperture and a faster shutter speed. When I look at my own images, and they look just a bit soft, I am reminded that I need a higher speed and that always does the trick.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 14:50:36   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
At f/8 the dof is about 10'. I agree that a f5 or even f 4.5 would have given me adequate dof at 5'. I also should have used auto ISO and I did not change to matrix metering soon enough.

I need more practice

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 15:02:30   #
fergmark Loc: norwalk connecticut
 
Practice is a good teacher. Learn it the hard way, but the lessons eventually sink in.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 15:10:04   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
I think I need a longer lens. This shot seems a little better. The photo has a 22" diagonal on my screen


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2020 15:34:11   #
WDCash Loc: Milford, Delaware, USA
 
Did you shoot this as JPEGs?

I think you did a fine job on them. As previously mentioned shooting through window glass is a huge challenge.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 15:54:25   #
home brewer Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana
 
I shoot jpegs and raw. The jpegs makes it easier to post.

Reply
Nov 30, 2020 16:25:14   #
WDCash Loc: Milford, Delaware, USA
 
home brewer wrote:
I shoot jpegs and raw. The jpegs makes it easier to post.


So its not a complet substitute for a longer lens but I have been having some success with Topaz Gigapixel. Shooting wildlife will always call for longer lenses. If we have 500 we want 600 or 800 or 1000.

You can try any of the Topaz programs for 30 days for free.

Run the image through LR, (Im experimenting with denoise and sharpen as well) Crop to pull in the subject and send it out to Gigapixel. Blow it back up to your native image size.

Its worth a shot.

Reply
Dec 1, 2020 07:52:49   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Probably the window. Nice catch.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.