How FOX distorts the news (Page 2): THAT's your big problem? Actual real news and numbers don't agree with your fantasies, so they're bad. He was pointing out the results as they came...

Harry0 Loc: Gardena, Cal

Howard5252 wrote:

As the president was speaking Thursday evening I was watching it on Fox News with Brett Baier.
Even as the president was saying his lead was being stolen in Pennsylvania the numbers on the right side of the screen showed his lead going down. Brett Baier pointed that out. What was not said by Brett Baier was that the votes coming in were from counties that were known to be predominantly Democratic. He's not stupid, it was deliberate! That's how they do it; they omit important information.

THAT's your big problem?
Actual real news and numbers don't agree with your fantasies, so they're bad.
He was pointing out the results as they came in. He deliberately told you the truth.
As it happened.
I guess you're right- why watch FAUX News when the truth might rear it's head?

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

Texcaster wrote:

No, most people call this sort of stuff satire ... and then there's you.

"John McCain Forks Donald Trump From The Grave In Arizona."

https://www.betootaadvocate.com/world-news/john-mccain-fucks-donald-trump-from-the-grave-in-arizona/

McCain was a looser, I give him props for his service. But his political career he was a war monger.
A puppet of the military industrial complex.

Rose42

Howard5252 wrote:

If you were watching that show, how would you have known that information was being omitted? Information that would have explained why Trump's lead was going down. Without that information, how would a viewer know that Trump's rant about his decreasing lead was bogus?

I have seen information omitted before and never assume anything anymore. Its not just Fox that distorts the news. They all do it.

RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida

Rose42 wrote:

They all do it. Pay more attention.

I don't think that Newsy, PBS, and the BBC show bias at all.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

RixPix wrote:

I don't think that Newsy, PBS, and the BBC show bias at all.

Glad you mentioned Newsy. It is a recent addition to cable and my viewing.

drainbamage

Texcaster wrote:

Murdoch Hours Away From Throwing Donnie Under The ... (show quote)

Tell Murdoch that this is how it works in the US...not the way HE thinks it should work:

Right now, every county in states who have finished counting ballots are canvassing their results. Not all states are at 100 percent count. Canvassing is a process that can take up to two weeks. This means those counties are making sure that the number of ballots cast matches the number of voters. Each county in every state has until Nov. 17 to canvas, and each state has until Dec. 8 to certify those results. After that, a candidate has 48 hours to demand a recount. That is done by a hand count, meaning no machine scan. That requires one democrat and one republican looking at every single ballot to assign that vote. Once the result is final, the Electoral College meets in each state on Dec. 14, and those votes are then sent to Washington D.C. by Dec. 23. Once the electoral votes are certified by January 6, the new President is inaugurated on Jan. 20.

Rose42

RixPix wrote:

I don't think .

Confirmation bias.

Harry0 Loc: Gardena, Cal

If you see the world thru caca colored glasses,
that's what FAUX News can see and smell.

Rose42

Harry0 wrote:

If you see the world thru caca colored glasses,
that's what FAUX News can see and smell.

You have Fox Derangement Syndrome.

RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida

Rose42 wrote:

They all do it. Pay more attention.

Not everybody...change to a different channel. Try Newsy. Straight forward, no bias approach.

Rose42

RixPix wrote:

Not everybody...change to a different channel. Try Newsy. Straight forward, no bias approach.

I don't watch Fox. And yes, they all do. To varying degrees.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

Lets assume tha FOX only reports favorable GOP news. The fox audience represents about 5% orf the total audience. That means that people get 95% of the information from all other media sources. Those sources report about 95% anti Trump opinion and "news" As a result Biden is the only president in US history that was elected by the MEDIA.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

boberic wrote:

Lets assume tha FOX only reports favorable GOP news. The fox audience represents about 5% orf the total audience. That means that people get 95% of the information from all other media sources. Those sources report about 95% anti Trump opinion and "news" As a result Biden is the only president in US history that was elected by the MEDIA.

Not true, the media in 2015 gave trump so much free advertising it was sickening and that got trump in.

Along with the evil electoral college.

They are just making up for that mistake this time around.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

++++

Kraken wrote:

Not true, the media in 2015 gave trump so much free advertising it was sickening and that got trump in.

Along with the evil electoral college.

They are just making up for that mistake this time around.

Oh I see. The media loved Trump. They endlessly reported his Russia collusion hoax. Reported about a phony Fisa+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ report. Agreed vwithy Spying on Trump's staff whiole he waws a candidate. Etc Etc Etc. Real free advertising. And even if what you said is true, 2 wrongs are wstill 2 wrongs. Neithyer bone is right. You just agreed that the MEDIA ELECTED TRUMP