Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Everything Leaks
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Sep 6, 2020 21:46:52   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
I believe dual pane windows have argon gas between the panes. I've wondered in the past how long that gas actually stays in there.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 21:53:47   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
Doyle Thomas wrote:
I recently took a class on vacuum technology. One of the topics was leak detection using helium and the point was made that "everything leaks". He is a noble gas, while common in the universe, it is not common in the atmosphere which could interfere with the detection process. Also the element is the 2nd smallest and can make its way through a small hole.

That got me thinking about cameras and lenses. The best lenses use argon, also a noble gas and a large molecule, to fill the space between the elements. The question is how long can be expected before the gas can become contaminated with atmosphere?

We all know removable lens cameras will build up dust and obtain a film (no pun intended) on the sensor even if you never remove the lens.
I recently took a class on vacuum technology. One ... (show quote)


Which 'best lenses' use argon? I can find no reference to anything by Canon, Nikon, Sigma and so forth using argon. There may be some specialty lenses that use it but I doubt that it is common. The lens teardowns I have seen, such as Canon's EF 100-400 L II, don't mention it.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 22:30:43   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
LFingar wrote:
Which 'best lenses' use argon? I can find no reference to anything by Canon, Nikon, Sigma and so forth using argon. There may be some specialty lenses that use it but I doubt that it is common. The lens teardowns I have seen, such as Canon's EF 100-400 L II, don't mention it.


I agree. I don’t see how you could seal anything other than a fixed focus prime.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 6, 2020 23:29:18   #
User ID
 
TriX wrote:
I agree. I don’t see how you could seal anything other than a fixed focus prime.


No reason for it to be fixed focus. Also a complex (zoom etc) lens could still be gas pressurized at each discrete, fixed, cluster of elements.

I tend to agree with others who doubt that the lenses which we generally encounter, with prices well below 5 figures, would be gas pressurized.

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 23:43:37   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
User ID wrote:
No reason for it to be fixed focus. Also a complex (zoom etc) lens could still be gas pressurized at each discrete, fixed, cluster of elements.

I tend to agree with others who doubt that the lenses which we generally encounter, with prices well below 5 figures, would be gas pressurized.


Yes, I guess maybe you could pressurize between groups - I was thinking about the difficulty of sealing a rotating focus barrel or the sliding barrel for those zooms that extend in length when zooming.

I was able to find one moderately priced nitrogen filled lens with a quick Google search: https://asia.olympus-imaging.com/product/compact/accessory/conversion_lens/index.html

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 12:00:57   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Re link below see: Final Assembly, page 32 and following pages.

https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/69779/776202013-MIT.pdf;sequence=2

Also see: Assembly main line.
https://www.tamron-usa.com/_data/lens_catalogues/Production_Process_Tamron_Lens.pdf

I did not see anything about inert gas pressurization.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 22:30:24   #
Doyle Thomas Loc: Vancouver Washington ~ USA
 
LFingar wrote:
Which 'best lenses' use argon? I can find no reference to anything by Canon, Nikon, Sigma and so forth using argon. There may be some specialty lenses that use it but I doubt that it is common. The lens teardowns I have seen, such as Canon's EF 100-400 L II, don't mention it.


there are also liquid filled lenses used in military satellites since the 1960's

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 7, 2020 22:35:22   #
Doyle Thomas Loc: Vancouver Washington ~ USA
 
Dino92G wrote:
That is a great question! One comment though on your statement below -

"I recently took a class on vacuum technology. One of the topics was leak detection using helium and the point was made that "everything leaks."

I spent 19 years working at GE Nuclear Energy in the Reactor Instrumentation Division, specifically for the NNPP (Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program) and we regularly used Helium Leak Detectors - mostly Varian brand. There is a term "hermetically sealed" that describes any type of sealing that makes a given object airtight (preventing the passage of air, oxygen, or other gases). This is critical for incore reactor instrumentation, so, despite your instructors statement - not everything leaks.
That is a great question! One comment though on y... (show quote)


then why do u need Helium Leak Detectors? lol

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 22:46:31   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
Doyle Thomas wrote:
there are also liquid filled lenses used in military satellites since the 1960's


The CIA's Corona satellites, which were operational from 1960 to 1972, used a number of technologies that were previously unheard of. Liquid or gas filled lenses are rare in the consumer market just the same. A bigger benefit to the average photographer is that the Corona project demonstrated the need for something better then film for spy satellites. The CIA financed much of Kodak's research into digital. The rest is history. Too bad that Kodak was smart enough to create digital photography but not smart enough to market it properly.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 23:46:22   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
LFingar wrote:
The CIA's Corona satellites, which were operational from 1960 to 1972, used a number of technologies that were previously unheard of. Liquid or gas filled lenses are rare in the consumer market just the same. A bigger benefit to the average photographer is that the Corona project demonstrated the need for something better then film for spy satellites. The CIA financed much of Kodak's research into digital. The rest is history. Too bad that Kodak was smart enough to create digital photography but not smart enough to market it properly.
The CIA's Corona satellites, which were operationa... (show quote)


Interesting reading (wiki) on the Corona program. The NRO was a customer of mine for many years, and I am familiar with the later KH (Keyhole) satellites and technology, but I didn’t know the history of the film based birds. Thanks for the insight.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.