Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why would a commercial printer do this?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Aug 26, 2020 12:36:05   #
Nicholas J DeSciose
 
I have had this problem. A lot of people are stuck in traditional sizes. 8 x 10. Their minds just don’t seem to understandThe new format, even though it’s probably 10 years old maybe 20 years I would like to give you an interesting example. A young lady print rep Looking at a beautiful reproduction of a soft focus image. Said you count possibly use this because it’s out of focus Keep in mind she’s looking at a reproduction

Reply
Aug 26, 2020 14:21:13   #
jrm21
 
It's entirely possible the printer is not printing at exactly 8.5 x 11" - which would really be at least 8.75 x 11.25 when bleed (i.e. "edge-to-edge") is included.

Letter size is not a very efficient size for most commercial printers, whether working sheetfed or web presses. Someone not involved in the industry will often refer to jobs as 8-1/2 x 11 or letter-sized (many of my clients do), when the actual piece is a little smaller. Printers will always indicate the actual job size on quotes and material specs, but that doesn't stop people from making the letter size reference for simplicity.

Reply
Aug 26, 2020 17:47:47   #
drucker Loc: Oregon
 
weedhook wrote:
A calendar has pages which are 8 1/2 by 11 inches. The person/company which will be printing the calendar has requested that photos (high res JPEG or Tiff files) submitted for printing on the calendar must be submitted in 8 by 10 inch format (4:5 aspect). I would have thought that it would be better to get 2:3 aspect files which would normally print out to 8 by 12 inches. So, from a printer's point of view, is it better to enlarge the 8 by 10 format to fit the 8 1/2 by 11 page or to reduce the 8 by 12 format to do the same thing? Or, of course, does it make any difference at all which way one goes. The photos on the calendar are, like on most calendars, borderless. Also, I have no contact with the printer, so I can't ask my question of the printer.
A calendar has pages which are 8 1/2 by 11 inches.... (show quote)


I fully retired about a year ago after 60+ years in the printing industry, most of it in prepress where dealing with photographs was a daily occurrence.

First let's deal with a couple of statements -- "enlarge the 8 by 10" OR "reduce the 8 by 12". Unless the rules of math and ratios are suspended, not allowing for bleeds, the 8" dimension of BOTH will require an enlargement of 106.25% with the 8x10 needing 110% to achieve the 11" finished size.

As to "why," my best guess is that 8x10 is more closely proportional to an 8½x11 than the 8x12 allowing the photographer to easily visualize the finished cropping. Not considering the bleed trim requirements, after enlargement the 8x10 would only require .3" of vertical cropping compared to the 8x12 requiring 1.75" horizontal cropping after enlargement to achieve the 8½x11 finished size.

Things have changed greatly over the years with digital providing its own set of communication challenges. Earlier for high quality publications we required b/w prints to be within 75% of final reproduction size or larger and transparencies for color work to be accompanied by a print of approximately final print size. Today the requirement is usually stated in minimum pixels (usually 300) per lineal inch of final reproduction size. e.g. 2400x3000 minimum pixels for a 8x10 image.

One of the challenges is that our label products usually need the customer's company logo. Often the logo arrives as a photocopy or screen print or a low resolution JPG screenshot. That results in our request for original art, digital vector art, or if appropriate, a high resolution TIFF file with a 300 dpi or greater resolution. More than once what came back was the JPG screenshot converted to TIFF and the dpi upped to 300 dpi in some photo editing program with the customer not having a clue why the new file was no better than the first one!

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2020 19:11:11   #
Dennis833 Loc: Australia
 
I have been selling two calendars commercially for the past 22 years. With my A4 calendar 210x297mm the page images have to be cropped to measure 213x 303mm. All of the calendar pages are placed in the page layout program to allow for a 3mm trim off both the left and right sides as well as the top of each image. But the front and back covers are placed in the page layout so that 3mm is cut off the bottom and each side. These settings are standard for all full bleed printing on a cmyk press world wide.

Reply
Aug 26, 2020 19:40:00   #
jrm21
 
Dennis833 wrote:
These settings are standard for all full bleed printing on a cmyk press world wide.


Except the US. Here we have a 1/8" standard bleed. :) <jk>

Reply
Aug 26, 2020 21:46:47   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Longshadow wrote:
It would be interesting to discover their reasoning/logic behind the 8x10 requirement.
The 8x10 would go to am 8.5x10.625. They may stretch the extra .375".
Maybe it works better than reducing an 8x12.
They had to pick a standard?


They could put the spiral binding in that 3/8" border... That would avoid cropping the image, although realistically, they have to leave a little bleed on the other edges.

There is not much difference in aspect ratio between 8x10 and 8.5x11, so if the composition is a little loose, it should be okay.

Reply
Aug 26, 2020 22:01:51   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
burkphoto wrote:
They could put the spiral binding in that 3/8" border... That would avoid cropping the image, although realistically, they have to leave a little bleed on the other edges.

There is not much difference in aspect ratio between 8x10 and 8.5x11, so if the composition is a little loose, it should be okay.


Reply
 
 
Aug 27, 2020 01:48:40   #
Boris77
 
weedhook wrote:
A calendar has pages which are 8 1/2 by 11 inches. The person/company which will be printing the calendar has requested that photos (high res JPEG or Tiff files) submitted for printing on the calendar must be submitted in 8 by 10 inch format (4:5 aspect). I would have thought that it would be better to get 2:3 aspect files which would normally print out to 8 by 12 inches. So, from a printer's point of view, is it better to enlarge the 8 by 10 format to fit the 8 1/2 by 11 page or to reduce the 8 by 12 format to do the same thing? Or, of course, does it make any difference at all which way one goes. The photos on the calendar are, like on most calendars, borderless. Also, I have no contact with the printer, so I can't ask my question of the printer.
A calendar has pages which are 8 1/2 by 11 inches.... (show quote)


Who said a calendar is 8.5 x 11 inches?
I have over a dozen free 2021 calendars as premiums from my donations.
EVERY one of them is 10.5 inches wide! The panel height varies from 8 to 8.5 inches.
8x10 inches is a very good proportion to fit the standard cut, as well as a simple figure to measure.
The KISS principle.
Boris

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 08:14:50   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Boris77 wrote:
Who said a calendar is 8.5 x 11 inches?
I have over a dozen free 2021 calendars as premiums from my donations.
EVERY one of them is 10.5 inches wide! The panel height varies from 8 to 8.5 inches.
8x10 inches is a very good proportion to fit the standard cut, as well as a simple figure to measure.
The KISS principle.
Boris

Might be the one he is getting??????

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 14:40:10   #
weedhook
 
Strodav wrote:
Just quibbling a bit. The printer works for the customer. The printer might guide the customer in the printing process including materials cost, but at the end of the day, it's the customer's final decision.


My guess is that the customer does not understand that.

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 14:44:41   #
weedhook
 
jrm21 wrote:
It's entirely possible the printer is not printing at exactly 8.5 x 11" - which would really be at least 8.75 x 11.25 when bleed (i.e. "edge-to-edge") is included.

Letter size is not a very efficient size for most commercial printers, whether working sheetfed or web presses. Someone not involved in the industry will often refer to jobs as 8-1/2 x 11 or letter-sized (many of my clients do), when the actual piece is a little smaller. Printers will always indicate the actual job size on quotes and material specs, but that doesn't stop people from making the letter size reference for simplicity.
It's entirely possible the printer is not printing... (show quote)


Thanks for the response. When I measure the calendar with a ruler, a page measures 8 1/2 x 11.

Reply
 
 
Aug 27, 2020 14:47:39   #
weedhook
 
drucker wrote:
I fully retired about a year ago after 60+ years in the printing industry, most of it in prepress where dealing with photographs was a daily occurrence.

First let's deal with a couple of statements -- "enlarge the 8 by 10" OR "reduce the 8 by 12". Unless the rules of math and ratios are suspended, not allowing for bleeds, the 8" dimension of BOTH will require an enlargement of 106.25% with the 8x10 needing 110% to achieve the 11" finished size.

As to "why," my best guess is that 8x10 is more closely proportional to an 8½x11 than the 8x12 allowing the photographer to easily visualize the finished cropping. Not considering the bleed trim requirements, after enlargement the 8x10 would only require .3" of vertical cropping compared to the 8x12 requiring 1.75" horizontal cropping after enlargement to achieve the 8½x11 finished size.

Things have changed greatly over the years with digital providing its own set of communication challenges. Earlier for high quality publications we required b/w prints to be within 75% of final reproduction size or larger and transparencies for color work to be accompanied by a print of approximately final print size. Today the requirement is usually stated in minimum pixels (usually 300) per lineal inch of final reproduction size. e.g. 2400x3000 minimum pixels for a 8x10 image.

One of the challenges is that our label products usually need the customer's company logo. Often the logo arrives as a photocopy or screen print or a low resolution JPG screenshot. That results in our request for original art, digital vector art, or if appropriate, a high resolution TIFF file with a 300 dpi or greater resolution. More than once what came back was the JPG screenshot converted to TIFF and the dpi upped to 300 dpi in some photo editing program with the customer not having a clue why the new file was no better than the first one!
I fully retired about a year ago after 60+ years i... (show quote)


Thanks for the response. I see your points.

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 14:48:26   #
weedhook
 
Dennis833 wrote:
I have been selling two calendars commercially for the past 22 years. With my A4 calendar 210x297mm the page images have to be cropped to measure 213x 303mm. All of the calendar pages are placed in the page layout program to allow for a 3mm trim off both the left and right sides as well as the top of each image. But the front and back covers are placed in the page layout so that 3mm is cut off the bottom and each side. These settings are standard for all full bleed printing on a cmyk press world wide.
I have been selling two calendars commercially for... (show quote)


Thanks for your response.

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 14:49:46   #
weedhook
 
burkphoto wrote:
They could put the spiral binding in that 3/8" border... That would avoid cropping the image, although realistically, they have to leave a little bleed on the other edges.

There is not much difference in aspect ratio between 8x10 and 8.5x11, so if the composition is a little loose, it should be okay.


Thanks for your response. By the way, I really enjoy most of your posts. Very informative.

Reply
Aug 27, 2020 14:52:04   #
weedhook
 
Boris77 wrote:
Who said a calendar is 8.5 x 11 inches?
I have over a dozen free 2021 calendars as premiums from my donations.
EVERY one of them is 10.5 inches wide! The panel height varies from 8 to 8.5 inches.
8x10 inches is a very good proportion to fit the standard cut, as well as a simple figure to measure.
The KISS principle.
Boris


Thanks for the response. By the way, the calendar is 8 1/2 x 11. I measured last years, but perhaps they are going to change it for 2021.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.