Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 200-500 vs Nikon 500 f5.6 PF
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 14, 2020 10:02:25   #
Steve Perry Loc: Sylvania, Ohio
 
Drip Dry McFleye wrote:
ProCam in Livonia, MI is where I got mine with one phone call and a two day wait. I had waited several months fruitlessly for one of the big New York houses to come through.


Yup, they're really good. It seems like I always get my stuff way faster with the smaller shops. I never try to get anything that's in demand from the big places.

Reply
Aug 14, 2020 10:17:40   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
Steve Perry wrote:
The 500PF is the easy winner at the long end. It's sharper all around, AF is faster, it's weather sealed, it's lighter, it's smaller (great for getting into tight places), and it includes memory set / function buttons.I haven't used my 200-500 since getting it.

Also, don't dismiss superior edge sharpness too quickly - it comes in handy for tight verticals. :)

I have a review out there for the 500PF and I do compare it to the 200-500. Admin doesn't like me posting links, so you'll have to google Steve Perry 500 PF review.
The 500PF is the easy winner at the long end. It's... (show quote)



Reply
Aug 16, 2020 06:59:54   #
runakid Loc: Shelbyville, TN
 
Thanks for the tip.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.