I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo series tripod with a center column. Last night I went out to shoot Neowise and discovered with the 55 I couldn't rotate the neck of the ball into the slots on the head to shoot up into the sky far enough. Switched to my BH40 and I could. Looking at the threads on the base of each ballhead revealed that the 40 has an enclosed "cup" with threads, allowing complete movement of the neck into the slot allowing horizontal to vertical rotation of the camera. On the other hand, the 55 base is open and the screw on the neck of the tripod extends up into the center of the ball (from the bottom) and prevents it from rotating into either side slot. Make sense? With the 55, if I want to change from horizontal to vertical I need to remove the ballhead a bit, rotate the neck into a slot, and re-tighten the head to the tripod. Is this a design feature, or am I screwing something up?
I use an l bracket on my cameras to change orientation is that is what you mean. It makes it faster and simpler.
J. R.
I have the BH55 and I use an L bracket.
mikee wrote:
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo series tripod with a center column. Last night I went out to shoot Neowise and discovered with the 55 I couldn't rotate the neck of the ball into the slots on the head to shoot up into the sky far enough. Switched to my BH40 and I could. Looking at the threads on the base of each ballhead revealed that the 40 has an enclosed "cup" with threads, allowing complete movement of the neck into the slot allowing horizontal to vertical rotation of the camera. On the other hand, the 55 base is open and the screw on the neck of the tripod extends up into the center of the ball (from the bottom) and prevents it from rotating into either side slot. Make sense? With the 55, if I want to change from horizontal to vertical I need to remove the ballhead a bit, rotate the neck into a slot, and re-tighten the head to the tripod. Is this a design feature, or am I screwing something up?
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo se... (
show quote)
Sounds like your mounding screw is a bit too long - shorten it - or use a shorter one ....
CamB
Loc: Juneau, Alaska
mikee wrote:
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo series tripod with a center column. Last night I went out to shoot Neowise and discovered with the 55 I couldn't rotate the neck of the ball into the slots on the head to shoot up into the sky far enough. Switched to my BH40 and I could. Looking at the threads on the base of each ballhead revealed that the 40 has an enclosed "cup" with threads, allowing complete movement of the neck into the slot allowing horizontal to vertical rotation of the camera. On the other hand, the 55 base is open and the screw on the neck of the tripod extends up into the center of the ball (from the bottom) and prevents it from rotating into either side slot. Make sense? With the 55, if I want to change from horizontal to vertical I need to remove the ballhead a bit, rotate the neck into a slot, and re-tighten the head to the tripod. Is this a design feature, or am I screwing something up?
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo se... (
show quote)
On some heads, ball and tilt, the threaded hole that the tripod (or monopod) screw goes into, comes in one size but has a little insert you can screw in it to make it fit a different size screw. Could it be that that insert is too long and it sticking up and hitting the ball. You would just need a shorter insert. They are usually really short in the first place too avoid this type of problem, but who knows.
...Cam
My 55 is mounted on an RRS quick release and I have no issues with full movement.
Yup, figured it out. Operator error. Thanks for the replies.
I have no such issues with my 55...
mikee wrote:
Yup, figured it out. Operator error. Thanks for the replies.
What was your operator error? Please don't leave us hanging.
mikee wrote:
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo series tripod with a center column. Last night I went out to shoot Neowise and discovered with the 55 I couldn't rotate the neck of the ball into the slots on the head to shoot up into the sky far enough. Switched to my BH40 and I could. Looking at the threads on the base of each ballhead revealed that the 40 has an enclosed "cup" with threads, allowing complete movement of the neck into the slot allowing horizontal to vertical rotation of the camera. On the other hand, the 55 base is open and the screw on the neck of the tripod extends up into the center of the ball (from the bottom) and prevents it from rotating into either side slot. Make sense? With the 55, if I want to change from horizontal to vertical I need to remove the ballhead a bit, rotate the neck into a slot, and re-tighten the head to the tripod. Is this a design feature, or am I screwing something up?
I have a BH55 and BH40. I use them on a Gitzo se... (
show quote)
I have a BH55 and I have no trouble aiming the camera vertically either up or down.
You can call RRS toll free at their customer service in Utah for help.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.