I'm thinking of selling my whole full frame kit for something that I will actually take with me. I find that my A7II sits home because the kit bag is just soooooo heavy. I love it's image quality but if it's going to sit home, what good is it? I'm looking for suggestions for maybe a pocket camera that will be with me all the time, or a bridge camera. I don't want to lose too much in dynamic range or image quality. My present lenses range from a 24mm prime, a 28-70mm kit, 50mm prime, 90mm macro and a Sigma 70-300mm OS. My main subject matter is macro or landscape. Occasionally birds, but not to often. So my question is should I keep my A7II, because I'll be disappointed with the results from its replacement or, do I go with the old adage, the best camera is the one you have with you? I should also add, for what it's worth, that I print my own photos on a Canon Pro 9000 Mark II. Looking forward to hearing from you all!
You mentioned 4 lenses but the topic says 5. What lens is not included and would you be able to tell me a price you'd be setting?
Thanks
I added it after. It's a 50mm Konica f1.7. The 24mm is a Vivitar f2.8
As far as a price? Give me a few minutes to put it together. There's a backpack and adapters for the prime
Everything, camera, which is like new with little use, probably less than 1000 shots, the 5 lenses, 3 adapters and the backpack $1200 plus shipping of course
Sony, Nikon and Canon all have pocket-sized cameras that capture in RAW. If you're a skilled photographer, they offer all the shooting modes and in-body stabilization, some with a pop-up flash. Capture a solid image and perfect it in post. Also, you can edit in the camera and wifi to the internet if out for weeks in just a tent or hotels.
Here's two close-up examples. You can extrapolate the camera's capabilities for more general / landscape images, or visit the "AT 2017" album in Flickr that contain a large collection of Canon Powershot G9 X II images (use the URL link that is the image title to get to Flickr, then find the album link from the image page).
Daddy Long Legs by
Paul Sager, on Flickr
AT Millipede by
Paul Sager, on Flickr
Ive been shooting for many years, professionally, although very briefly. I shoot in RAW and I think I know my way around a camera pretty well. So I'd want those capabilities. Those close ups are wonderful. Were they with the Canon G9? I forgot to mention that an EVF is important. Does that have one?
SteveG wrote:
I'm thinking of selling my whole full frame kit for something that I will actually take with me. I find that my A7II sits home because the kit bag is just soooooo heavy. I love it's image quality but if it's going to sit home, what good is it? I'm looking for suggestions for maybe a pocket camera that will be with me all the time, or a bridge camera. I don't want to lose too much in dynamic range or image quality. My present lenses range from a 24mm prime, a 28-70mm kit, 50mm prime, 90mm macro and a Sigma 70-300mm OS. My main subject matter is macro or landscape. Occasionally birds, but not to often. So my question is should I keep my A7II, because I'll be disappointed with the results from its replacement or, do I go with the old adage, the best camera is the one you have with you? I should also add, for what it's worth, that I print my own photos on a Canon Pro 9000 Mark II. Looking forward to hearing from you all!
I'm thinking of selling my whole full frame kit fo... (
show quote)
I've spent most of Spring 2020 with just a 24mm prime and a7II. As a single body & lens combo, I find the Sony to be an excellent size and weight w/ nothing more than a back-up card and battery in a pants pocket. Are you bringing too much gear, or is even a single camera and body too heavy? If you're carting around too much gear, start there for adjustments. Or, see the pocket-size camera idea mentioned above.
SteveG wrote:
Ive been shooting for many years, professionally, although very briefly. I shoot in RAW and I think I know my way around a camera pretty well. So I'd want those capabilities. Those close ups are wonderful. Were they with the Canon G9? I forgot to mention that an EVF is important. Does that have one?
Above is a Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II. Google camera reviews and check all the various competing models / brands. They all have a different mix of focal length vs movable screen, etc. Find the mix of 8 to 10 ish options that all the brands mix n match for the camera version that fits your needs.
I could be carrying too much gear. I being it because I don't want to miss something that I may need, but that's for a general shoot. If shooting something specifically, I can certainly cut down on what I carry. Probably should get a small bag and do that. It's certainly a great suggestion! Appreciate it!
SteveG wrote:
I could be carrying too much gear. I being it because I don't want to miss something that I may need, but that's for a general shoot. If shooting something specifically, I can certainly cut down on what I carry. Probably should get a small bag and do that. It's certainly a great suggestion! Appreciate it!
I have a ThinkTank messenger bag when I want to bring along a second or 3rd lens. It still limits what / how much, but gives at least one other option beyond just the single lens & camera approach.
I've written before that if all my gear was lost or stolen I would not replace it. Instead I would buy a Sony RX10 (now in version IV). My wife beat me to it. Hers is showing up on Monday.
Whenever the RX10 shows up on this forum, or any other forum, the raves about picture quality are prolific.
Definitely another option to think about. The A7II is certainly not a heavy camera and when I had just the kit lens it wasn't a chore to carry.
Isn't the RX10 bigger than a Sony A7II? Granted with a huge range on the lens!
SteveG wrote:
I'm thinking of selling my whole full frame kit for something that I will actually take with me. I find that my A7II sits home because the kit bag is just soooooo heavy. I love it's image quality but if it's going to sit home, what good is it? I'm looking for suggestions for maybe a pocket camera that will be with me all the time, or a bridge camera. I don't want to lose too much in dynamic range or image quality. My present lenses range from a 24mm prime, a 28-70mm kit, 50mm prime, 90mm macro and a Sigma 70-300mm OS. My main subject matter is macro or landscape. Occasionally birds, but not to often. So my question is should I keep my A7II, because I'll be disappointed with the results from its replacement or, do I go with the old adage, the best camera is the one you have with you? I should also add, for what it's worth, that I print my own photos on a Canon Pro 9000 Mark II. Looking forward to hearing from you all!
I'm thinking of selling my whole full frame kit fo... (
show quote)
i'mm a lot like you , i'm old. I have a small camera I keep with me at all times. I keep my main set up for big occasions. no matter what camera I choose I will loose some iq.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.