Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Looking for a good tripod
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Jun 20, 2020 14:21:00   #
mgeyelin
 
Peak Design. The aluminum tripod is only a couple of ounces heavier than the carbon fiber one, so I went with that. Brilliant design and superior build quality.

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 16:21:33   #
newtoyou Loc: Eastport
 
janewynn wrote:
Hi Everyone,

My wobbly tripod finally broke, i will say "yeah" as I need a good light weight one that can hold a camera with a 500mm lens. I like photographing birds and sports. Any suggestions?


And now, are you better informed?
Any number of opinions to choose from.
Bill

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 16:36:54   #
Poppy2
 
PixelStan77 wrote:


I have an STX that I’m very happy with!

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2020 16:58:23   #
latebloomer Loc: Topeka, KS
 
Listen to Gene51. He knows what he is talking about.

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 17:17:48   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
mgeyelin wrote:
Peak Design. The aluminum tripod is only a couple of ounces heavier than the carbon fiber one, so I went with that. Brilliant design and superior build quality.


But, it does get poor reviews - and for good reason from what I see .....

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 18:15:16   #
Jay Drew Loc: Boise, Id.
 
I have a Gitzo GT 3541 XLS. The top tube O.D. is 32mm. Overall Length 27 in. w/o center post. A little more with. That's awfully long for air travel. Fine for car travel. I really like this tripod & in particular the “G” lock. All I have to do is lightly snug down a ring w/ 2 fingers & it tightens it's self down the rest of the way if necessary. It takes a little more effort to loosen, but certainly not bad.
Does RRS have an equivalent to the G-Lock? I'm curious, I've googled but not found an answer.
Thanks, Jay Drew

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 18:37:09   #
Photocraig
 
Agreeing with Gene51, always a good bet,

I've had a Gitzo Mountineer for over 25 years and it has stood up extremely well. However, it is a 4 section tripod, with the 4th section legs quite shall in diameter. Here's the GOOD news, with flippy screens, we no longer need our cameras to eye level for most purposes--Birds in flight and sports being the exception. Topping with a Ball head, for me a Kirk B-1, of a RRS would be good. A gimbal, which I have no experience with might serve you well, too.

The real message here is even if a tripod has skinny 4th section legs, if you're of modest height or can kneel etc. you don't need to extend a tripod to 6' all the time, anymore. Under lighter loads, indoors etc, sure, go ahead, and use those skinny tubes. But in the field, even with a smaller zoom (70-300) I don't extend the skinny legs, and just look down (Like a Twin lens waist level finder) onto the Screen in Live View. Works for landscapes and for stationary or walking animals and street folk.

Good luck. There is some good info here--especially reliable from CHG Canon and Gene51.
C

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2020 20:19:12   #
arathorn357 Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
As an alternative view, I have found stability at height (I am 6ft 2") and the ability to quickly change heads and cameras attached to them mean this solution worked best for me - but YMMV!

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1340216-REG/leofoto_ln_404c_40mm_carbon_fiber.html

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 20:27:44   #
FotoHam
 
47greyfox wrote:
Currently, an instant 5% coupon is available getting an additional $15 off.


Good info. Thanks

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 20:58:48   #
HiFromSusan
 
I have a Bogen Manfrotto that cost all of $3 at a local GoodWill store. But I use it only when I drag out my Canon gear. No need for a tripod with Olympus! 5-axis in-body stabilization gives me up to 5 stops of handholding!

Reply
Jun 20, 2020 23:02:52   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Photocraig wrote:
Agreeing with Gene51, always a good bet,

I've had a Gitzo Mountineer for over 25 years and it has stood up extremely well. However, it is a 4 section tripod, with the 4th section legs quite shall in diameter. Here's the GOOD news, with flippy screens, we no longer need our cameras to eye level for most purposes--Birds in flight and sports being the exception. Topping with a Ball head, for me a Kirk B-1, of a RRS would be good. A gimbal, which I have no experience with might serve you well, too.

The real message here is even if a tripod has skinny 4th section legs, if you're of modest height or can kneel etc. you don't need to extend a tripod to 6' all the time, anymore. Under lighter loads, indoors etc, sure, go ahead, and use those skinny tubes. But in the field, even with a smaller zoom (70-300) I don't extend the skinny legs, and just look down (Like a Twin lens waist level finder) onto the Screen in Live View. Works for landscapes and for stationary or walking animals and street folk.

Good luck. There is some good info here--especially reliable from CHG Canon and Gene51.
C
Agreeing with Gene51, always a good bet, br br I... (show quote)


Us older folks do not like bending over - better to get GOOD legs and go high whenever you want ! - maybe even to satisfy composition ....or on uneven ground.
.

Reply
 
 
Jun 21, 2020 06:57:02   #
Hamltnblue Loc: Springfield PA
 
As you see RRS and Gitzo are recommended by many for good reason.
I have a Gitzo and can vouch for it.
Another that is out there is promediagear. They are in the same price range but use aluminum leg locks.

Whatever you decide, it's not just about getting a quality tripod. You can have a nice gitzo, but will be unhappy if you have the wrong one. Make sure whatever you get has ratings well over the minimum required for you 500mm lens. Also don't forget that the quality of the head used is just as important. From the reading I've done It's hard to beat the really right stuff BH-55.

Good Luck

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 07:52:46   #
Jeffcs Loc: Myrtle Beach South Carolina
 
Just make sure you’ll carry it in and out (weight) than make sure it will support more than your rig weights I prefer carbon fiber it’s lighter and doesn’t get cold

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 09:17:12   #
Paul Diamond Loc: Atlanta, GA, USA
 
janewynn wrote:
Hi Everyone,

My wobbly tripod finally broke, i will say "yeah" as I need a good light weight one that can hold a camera with a 500mm lens. I like photographing birds and sports. Any suggestions?


Hi, More info is needed - a budget amount, how much weight for a "light weight" is too much (including whatever head you will use), how tall do you need it to go and then, how "sturdy".

A 1+ pound Manfrotto monopod, when added to a D850 and 200-500 zoom is about 9.5 pounds of dead carry weight at the end of my arm. That seems to be nearly my limit for me to heft for 3-5 miles at a time (small backpack with extra body, batteries, macro lens, flash, plastic trash bag to cover everything if an unexpected storm happens - on my back).

Way back in my ancient history, working in camera stores to earn $$ to go to college, most customers had not thought about their 'shopping list' of budget, must have essentials and other considerations when they seemed to be ready to spend some money today.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:46:24   #
wapiti Loc: round rock, texas
 
latebloomer wrote:
Listen to Gene51. He knows what he is talking about.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.