I thought other girls and shots were stronger for the publisher's purpose, but they chose this one. Different retailers allow different levels of nudity; their designer did two book cover versions. Dunno how the book did; there's enormous competition from other publishers, not to mention the millions of legit and pirated photos on the web. Tip: when shooting for stock or covers, leave space around the subject so the graphic designer can easily extend background and/or have places to surprint or reverse text or graphics. Shown below are the original and two versions. ~850 watt-seconds of studio strobe through softbox. Nikon D300 24-70 fixed aperture zoom.
bdk
Loc: Sanibel Fl.
Many people crop their images and then delete the originals . Yours is a good tip leave space . I actually had in a class , shooting covers, and that was one of the tips. The second was never delete a photo , even if you have edited it, save the original. The instructor even said save your terrible shots because some day you may need it ( though I don't know why)
she is a pretty girl I think we saw her a few times
She IS very pretty. I submitted her for a Playboy centerfold. They did a test shoot but she didn't get the nod. Probably because of two small tattoos.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
travelwp wrote:
Very nice tits.
Well, you never disappoint!
Glad I could put a smile on your face John.
travelwp wrote:
Very nice tits.
Thought you might have grown up, but no.
Beautiful young lady.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
Good advice. A very pretty model with a "girl-next-door" look.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for the publisher's purpose, but they chose this one. Different retailers allow different levels of nudity; their designer did two book cover versions. Dunno how the book did; there's enormous competition from other publishers, not to mention the millions of legit and pirated photos on the web. Tip: when shooting for stock or covers, leave space around the subject so the graphic designer can easily extend background and/or have places to surprint or reverse text or graphics. Shown below are the original and two versions. ~850 watt-seconds of studio strobe through softbox. Nikon D300 24-70 fixed aperture zoom.
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (
show quote)
Beautiful young lady, shame to see only half of her. Would love to see the other half.
travelwp wrote:
Very nice tits.
You’re all class. Bottom of it.
Hope she never gets "tit cancer"
Rab-Eye wrote:
Thought you might have grown up, but no.
Years ago I was in the US Navy and all of us called them tits and it was not a derogatory term. Real men don’t have a problem with the word “tits”.
Since you have trouble with the word “tit”, I think of you as a “wimpy liberal
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for the publisher's purpose, but they chose this one. Different retailers allow different levels of nudity; their designer did two book cover versions. Dunno how the book did; there's enormous competition from other publishers, not to mention the millions of legit and pirated photos on the web. Tip: when shooting for stock or covers, leave space around the subject so the graphic designer can easily extend background and/or have places to surprint or reverse text or graphics. Shown below are the original and two versions. ~850 watt-seconds of studio strobe through softbox. Nikon D300 24-70 fixed aperture zoom.
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (
show quote)
I sent this in before. She looks like Nicole Wallace on MSNBC or her daughter.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for the publisher's purpose, but they chose this one. Different retailers allow different levels of nudity; their designer did two book cover versions. Dunno how the book did; there's enormous competition from other publishers, not to mention the millions of legit and pirated photos on the web. Tip: when shooting for stock or covers, leave space around the subject so the graphic designer can easily extend background and/or have places to surprint or reverse text or graphics. Shown below are the original and two versions. ~850 watt-seconds of studio strobe through softbox. Nikon D300 24-70 fixed aperture zoom.
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (
show quote)
Good cover photo of a photogenic model.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.