Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Should I upgrade
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Jun 2, 2020 16:03:08   #
Roe Cole
 
I think I’d put money into the glass. I’m a Canon shooter so I’m not that aqua red with yours but here are the basics I feet are key. You should be able to take photos at 30 mp or better. That relates to image quality. After the 30mp pixel goal, I’d put money into more glass. Something like a 35mm prime for taking pics of the grandkids then an 85mm prime after that. Your zoom has a great range so that’s a keeper. The zoom plus the 2 lenses I mention give you a great range of versatility for pretty much everything you’ll encounter.

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 16:33:29   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
The OP likely has good enough equipment to provide the majority of his current needs and enjoyment. More lenses or another camera is not magical or necessary. He has a great focal length range and a decent camera.

The perception that we need all this great gear to produce satisfying pictures is bogus!

If you enjoy expensive stuff, that's fine. 30 mp plus is not a necessity nor will it provide some magical potion to produce noticeability better pictures.

"Been there, done that."

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 16:35:33   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
DaveO wrote:
The OP likely has good enough equipment to provide the majority of his current needs and enjoyment. More lenses or another camera is not magical or necessary. He has a great focal length range and a decent camera.

The perception that we need all this great gear to produce satisfying pictures is bogus!

If you enjoy expensive stuff, that's fine. 30 mp plus is not a necessity nor will it provide some magical potion to produce noticeability better pictures.

"Been there, done that."
The OP likely has good enough equipment to provid... (show quote)



I have an 18-200 and a 50, that's all I need.

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2020 16:36:58   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Longshadow wrote:


I have an 18-200 and a 50, that's all I need.


I wish I had been that smart!

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 16:52:22   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
DaveO wrote:
I wish I had been that smart!

Maybe not so much that smart?- a change pf philosophy.
For my film cameras I had six fixed focal length lenses from 28-200.
I found that having the one decent good range zoom is SO much simpler, easier, and quicker.

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 17:18:34   #
neillaubenthal
 
Lots of good advice here...but it comes down to do you want it and can you afford it. Double yes means do it. What you have will do the job...but as you get better at it and expand you might want to investigate back button focus, manual with auto ISO, and all that jazz...and more knobs makes all of that easier. I shoot with a D7500 but my wife still uses my hand me down D7100 just fine. Toying with a D780...but it really isn’t a need...it’s a want because of the better high iso performance and larger pixels means less noise from a physics standpoint...but that has to be balanced against the loss of effective focal length of my long lens...Tamron 150-600...if I switch from crop to full frame. Would strongly consider the Tamron 1.4 TC if I upgrade so as to not lose focal length. I shoot for myself and my web travel blog...so buying the expensive glass just isn’t worth it to me.

If money allows...you should have all the toys you want.

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 18:03:19   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
papadon wrote:
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into photography in my 20's and then life happened and I went from my SLR to point and shoots. Life now have lives of their own so last August I purchased a Nilon D3500 kit then I purchased a Tamron 18-400 zoom last week. I'm not a professional, not interested in any one thing to photograph. I'm using the camera for vacations, grandkids, experiments with birds, the moon and anything else I might think about. So, here's the questions, should I upgrade to the D7200? Will I really gain anything or will the 3500 do all I want it too? Thanks
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into... (show quote)


I don’t consider the D7200 an upgrade. It is older technology and weighs about twice as much as your D3500.

Some years ago I tried upgrading from a D5100 to a D7000. I found the D7000 much more difficult to use because of the unreadable screen on top and inactive Info screen.

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2020 18:07:47   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
charlienow wrote:
Papadon. I am a 72 year old grandpa and use my d7200 with Nikon 18-300 zoom much like you. 2 years ago I sold my d5500 and bought the d7200 and haven’t regretted the switch. The only thing I sometime miss is the articulating screen on the d5500. The little extra weight doesn’t bother me, even on a long day out while traveling.

If you are only going to use the 7200 or any other more advanced camera you might choose as more a point and shoot camera then stick with your current camera. However if you are going to take advantage of the advanced features of a more complex features of a camera such as the 7200 then go for it. You will like the larger viewfinder of the pentaprism of the 7*** series and up Nikon camera. The dual card slot comes in handy on my 7200. Slot 1 is for raw files and slot 2 is jpeg backup files. You don’t have to go into the menu system to change different settings. Get a good book or 2 on whatever camera you choose.

The d7500 has a better video shooting system and an articulating screen. I am seriously considering buying this body for those 2 features alone. It does have some other advantages over the 7200 but none that really would pull me on that direction.

I am definitely not interested in the d500 for one very big reason...there is not a built in flash. I like being able to pop up the flash and get a shot of the grandkids or other closer objects without having to always carry an external flash. The d500 requires a flash on the hot shoe. I also use the 7200 Built in flash in commander mode to trigger off camera flash. The d500 requires something in the hot shoe to do this.

Anyway good luck in making your decision.

Chuck
Papadon. I am a 72 year old grandpa and use my d72... (show quote)


You do not need commander mode to trigger off camera flash using on camera one. I did it all the time with D5xxs and SB700...using a shade Nikon provides so the trigger flash doesn’t illuminate the image.

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 20:17:13   #
GKarl Loc: Northern New Hampshire
 
Chris wrote:
Being a senior myself my advice is it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. At this point in my life if I want it, if I can afford it and it gives me pleasure I buy it. That's my 2 cents



Reply
Jun 2, 2020 20:36:55   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
papadon wrote:
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into photography in my 20's and then life happened and I went from my SLR to point and shoots. Life now have lives of their own so last August I purchased a Nilon D3500 kit then I purchased a Tamron 18-400 zoom last week. I'm not a professional, not interested in any one thing to photograph. I'm using the camera for vacations, grandkids, experiments with birds, the moon and anything else I might think about. So, here's the questions, should I upgrade to the D7200? Will I really gain anything or will the 3500 do all I want it too? Thanks
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into... (show quote)


My simple answer is "no." It would be a complete waste of your money. Your current gear provides everything you need for the type of photography you describe. >Alan

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 21:43:00   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
Longshadow wrote:


Which way did it go...?!

Reply
 
 
Jun 2, 2020 21:52:08   #
uhaas2009
 
On the 7200 you don’t need to go in menu to change like iso, focus, WB, Aperture.....i Fund That is just more photographer friendly.
On the 7200 you can use the older D-lenses.

Reply
Jun 2, 2020 22:57:29   #
tomcat
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
It's your money. It's your decision. It you let the UHH community spend your money, nothing you have will ever be good enough to their standards.

If you were serious about wildlife and sports, you could get a larger buffer and higher frames per second so you could rip a burst of images over a few second and come away with 20+ images to choose from with the D7200. The D7200 also gives you 2 card slots and more controls of the camera on the camera body rather than buried in menus. But, your D3500 is a serious DLSR and more than enough camera for all your uses, including wildlife and sports. You don't have to process your images, but even just for sharing, you'd benefit from some organizational software. That might be a better next purchase than a camera change.

Your camera is only as good as you can use it. Are you shooting in AI Servo using selective focus points? Do you capture in RAW, expose to the right, or adjust the settings for the situation for JPEG? The camera can help, but a new camera alone doesn't make you a better photographer.
It's your money. It's your decision. It you let th... (show quote)


If he's shooting in AI Servo with a Nikon, then he is in some kind of serious trouble....haha

Reply
Jun 3, 2020 01:00:23   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
uhaas2009 wrote:
On the 7200 you don’t need to go in menu to change like iso, focus, WB, Aperture.....i Fund That is just more photographer friendly.
On the 7200 you can use the older D-lenses.


You also don’t with the D5xxx, and I’d expect the D3500. You use the active info screen.

The info screen on D7xxxs was not active. You had to use randomly placed unlighted buttons and an ureadable little green screen. Maybe fixed with D7500.

Reply
Jun 3, 2020 09:22:18   #
Harry0 Loc: Gardena, Cal
 
papadon wrote:
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into photography in my 20's and then life happened and I went from my SLR to point and shoots. Life now have lives of their own so last August I purchased a Nilon D3500 kit then I purchased a Tamron 18-400 zoom last week. I'm not a professional, not interested in any one thing to photograph. I'm using the camera for vacations, grandkids, experiments with birds, the moon and anything else I might think about. So, here's the questions, should I upgrade to the D7200? Will I really gain anything or will the 3500 do all I want it too? Thanks
I'm a 75 year old great grandpa who was quite into... (show quote)


No.
If you do your part, and shoot the same, the results will still be the same.
The D7200 is almost twice as heavy. I had a D7100 and a D3200- kept the D3200.
PRACTICE with what you have- check the free Youtube tutorials, and go thru the steps.
It really helps whne your fingers know where to go and get things done.
If that Tamron lens is working for you, you may not need any other.
Plus it'll leave you more change for kiddy things. Like trips, prints, etc.
https://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-D7200-vs-Nikon-D3500

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.