Looking for the best affordable and performing Nikon D7000 series Camera, I presently own a Nikon D3300 Camera with 4 Nikon lens. Looking for reason WHY too.
I too think the D7200 is the 'right mix' of features, cost and performance. If you can find one where the shuttercount can be confirmed, don't hesitate to buy a used one at 30k or less on the count. But, the D7200 is too old of a camera (March 2015) to pay a new price for. If you want something 'new', look at the D7500 or D500.
I like my 7100 with the 2 slots. One reason for not upgrading at this time The 7200 is also a great unit. You can find some good buys on Craigslist also
I like my 7100 with the 2 slots. One reason for not upgrading at this time The 7200 is also a great unit. You can find some good buys on Craigslist also
AndyH
Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
I love our D7100s, and am not interested in the D7500 due to the absence of the second slot and the presence of more bells and whistles to go wrong on features I don't need or want (Flippy touch screens, GPS, wireless, etc.). I'm not generally a "Latest and Greatest" aficionado - my favorite cameras all shoot actual film, and some of them are old enough to be on Medicare...
The only real difference between the D7100 and D7200 is in the buffer capacity / burst shooting speed. I don't do much wildlife or sports, and when I do, I can always choose to shoot JPEG. So the 7100 was my conscious choice. I don't think you can go far wrong with either - the low light capacity will provide a big upgrade from your present gear.
Everyone has different needs, but that's my personal choice.
Andy
AndyH wrote:
I love our D7100s, and am not interested in the D7500 due to the absence of the second slot and the presence of more bells and whistles to go wrong on features I don't need or want (Flippy touch screens, GPS, wireless, etc.). I'm not generally a "Latest and Greatest" aficionado - my favorite cameras all shoot actual film, and some of them are old enough to be on Medicare...
The only real difference between the D7100 and D7200 is in the buffer capacity / burst shooting speed. I don't do much wildlife or sports, and when I do, I can always choose to shoot JPEG. So the 7100 was my conscious choice. I don't think you can go far wrong with either - the low light capacity will provide a big upgrade from your present gear.
Everyone has different needs, but that's my personal choice.
Andy
I love our D7100s, and am not interested in the D7... (
show quote)
Don't forget the better D7200 ISO performance. Plenty info on comparison tests between the two. I had thousands of pics with my D7100 until my wife brode it and replaced it with the D7500. The one slot only was not a deal breaker and the Expeed 5 processor was a step up for sure.
AndyH
Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
DaveO wrote:
Don't forget the better D7200 ISO performance. Plenty info on comparison tests between the two. I had thousands of pics with my D7100 until my wife brode it and replaced it with the D7500. The one slot only was not a deal breaker and the Expeed 5 processor was a step up for sure.
I realize this is theoretically true, but I like to keep my ISO low anyway, and it's not a deal breaker. The prices for used models of both are actually fairly close right now, so it might be worth it - they were much further apart when we bought. I'll need to buy another DX body as a spare sometime, so I can keep on shooting our DX lenses regardless of what comes.
Andy
Dual card slots are a must??? I don't see it. That's the last criterium I would use to make a decision. I've got a D200, D5000, D500, D610, D850. None of them have ever had more than one card installed. And never needed.
I've used a 7200 for a few years doing wild life. THe only thing I missed was the flippy lcd
I'm gonna have to vote for the D7200 also. My first Nikon DSLR was a D7200 and it is an excellent and versatile camera. It may be an older model now but it is still very relevant. You can't go wrong with a D7200.
The Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series cameras have a pentamirror viewfinder. If you go to a D7xxx series or above Nikon you get a superior pentaprism viewfinder. The glass prism inside gives a larger, slightly brighter view through the viewfinder. I have a D7500, two D500's, and a D750. The view through the viewfinder of my D500's is as large as the view in my full frame D750. You will also get dual command wheels and the U1 and U2 memory banks on the mode dial.
Pentaprism viewfinder left, Pentamirror viewfinder right (Both DX cameras)
(
Download)
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Silverrails wrote:
Looking for the best affordable and performing Nikon D7000 series Camera, I presently own a Nikon D3300 Camera with 4 Nikon lens. Looking for reason WHY too.
The most affordable would be the D7000, followed by the D7100, D7200, and finally the D7500.
The best D7000 series camera is up to the photographer. They all do a great job. The lens makes the difference in all D7000 camera's. So does the photographer. I have owned and used the D7000, 7100, and D7200, they all can deliver outstanding images. Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.