Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Bridge Cameras
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Apr 1, 2020 13:43:19   #
RLSprouse Loc: Encinitas CA (near Sandy Eggo)
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.


Any photographer who would discount your work due to the camera you use is a damn fool.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 14:13:57   #
photoman022 Loc: Manchester CT USA
 
If you didn't tell us we would never have known.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 14:26:45   #
nadelewitz Loc: Ithaca NY
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.


Worrying whether "other photographers" are discounting your your work due to your camera choice is a misguided, useless endeavor.

How do these unnamed people know what camera you use? Let your work be admired/judged for what it IS. not what hardware you created it with.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2020 14:27:32   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.


One of my three cameras is a Nikon Coolpix, Bridge L840. The other two are a Nikon DSLR and a 20 megapixels Sony pocket camera. I use the Bridge camera for extended focal range. Because, the longest focal range lens I have for my DSLR is 300mm. My Bridge camera goes to 855mm. I have seen the Canon SX60 at a camera shop, when it was first released. It's a very good camera. Shoots JPEG and RAW, and has a focal range to 1365mm. It superseded the SX50. And, is a better camera. IMO. Keep it. It will serve you well.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 14:31:31   #
CathyAnn Loc: Apache Junction, AZ
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.



A very active member on UHH who was also a friend of mine, and has since passed away, Snap Shot, took pictures with a small, old, point 'n shoot camera that fit into his shirt pocket. Most of his photos were of flowers, absolutely stunning with his skill in post-processing. You can look them up here on UHH.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 14:39:45   #
ckescher
 
I have been looking at bridge point and shoot zoom cameras. Sony is pricey. Nikon and Panasonic look interesting. Any opinions?

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 14:40:00   #
rdalex
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.


More and more fall back on the bridge camera. Have used old Nikon D90 for years, but for convenience traveling use Panasonic ZS 100 and have a Panasonic ZS 70 too (smaller sensor but 24-720 zoom for some amazing animal pictures, etc.)
Just 'cause no one sees the sausage factory does not mean they will not enjoy the sausage.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2020 14:58:11   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
While I don't have one, I'd consider the Lumix FZ1000 or FZ2500

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 15:09:16   #
richardsaccount
 
IndyBob wrote:
You can't please everyone
So you got to please yourself.


That is a line from Rick don't call me Rickey because I'm a veteran Nelson (Don Imus quote).
The song is Garden Party. He had a concert at Madison Square Garden and tried new songs . The audience was not pleased.
They were apparently content with the tried and true. Human nature I guess.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 15:20:53   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
Gene51 wrote:
Lower resolution? Tiny Sensor? Limited IQ? Are you sure about that?

A 20 mp image still has 20 mp, regardless of whether it comes from a full frame camera with a "big" lens or a 1" sensor with an attached lens that can't be changed. Big prints are viewed at greater distances, negating many of the advantages of a large camera. Cropping is enhanced by higher pixel count more than sensor size.

Putting my "Devil's Advocate" hat aside, I would not trade my D810 for anything other than a D850 - maybe. But I wouldn't trade my Sony RX10M4 bridge camera either.

Images below all taken with a bridge camera with a 1" sensor, an RX10M4 or and M3.

_DSC0061-DSC-RX10M3--(28-11-17) high res by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC2858-DSC-RX10M4--(19-08-18) by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC2780-DSC-RX10M4--(23-05-18) by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC2771-DSC-RX10M4--(23-05-18) by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC2162-DSC-RX10M4--(19-02-18) hi res by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC2148-DSC-RX10M4--(19-02-18) hi res by Gene Lugo, on Flickr

_DSC0781 by Gene Lugo, on Flickr
Lower resolution? Tiny Sensor? Limited IQ? Are yo... (show quote)


Yes, I'm sure about that and you may have missed some of what I was saying. Displaying your beautiful and excellent images on my PC'S screen proves nothing and actually lends itself to my point. Keep up the good work and happy shooting.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 15:44:58   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
rmorrison1116 wrote:
Yes, I'm sure about that and you may have missed some of what I was saying. Displaying your beautiful and excellent images on my PC'S screen proves nothing and actually lends itself to my point. Keep up the good work and happy shooting.


Well, I am pretty sure I understood clearly what meant when you wrote, "But, you are limited by the IQ when it comes to what you may do with said image. A camera with a better, larger sensor increases the possibilities of what you can do with the image, like cropping or making large prints or editing. A bigger sensor coupled with a bigger lens will give you more data to work with."

It couldn't be any clearer, or my reading comprehension any sharper.

The purpose of my posting a variety of images, is that unlike your portrayal that cameras with small sensors have limitations can be significant, I just wanted to set the record straight - what was once true about "tiny" sensors is no longer true, and even an iPhone image can be blown up to billboard size. Just because I posted some images that were actually resized to a lower resolution and they still look "that" good clearly indicates that the little cameras are extremely capable - a lot more capable than you give them credit for. I think the images prove a lot, and I am sorry this was all wasted on you.

I am not sure what your point is at this juncture. Each one of your claims were discredited. BTW, I have printed 24x36 images - the sparrow and and the long shot of some stoops on Washington Sq north - and the image quality is excellent. I've been shooting full frame for the past 10 yrs, and the bridge camera for the past three, so I have a good frame of reference.

BTW, which bridge camera do you use?

Here is a very large print made from a very tiny sensor JIC you had any doubts:

.



Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2020 15:58:49   #
sailwiz Loc: Santee, CA
 
Love my Lumix 1000 II.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 16:23:17   #
maxx466
 
Rae Zimmerman wrote:
I am curious about how many UHH readers primarily shoot with bridge cameras. My only camera is a Canon PowerShot SX60 IS. I understand its limits and am very happy with the results I achieve. I mostly photograph birds and landscapes. I'm interested in whether other photographers would discount my work due to the camera I use.


I also use my SX60 90% of the time.
I have the 7D also with 5 good lens and don`t feel like lugging it around.
I print 13x19 photos from both cameras and can`t see the difference in picture quality.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 17:27:47   #
B1-ujphotographer
 
I use a bridge camera for walking around and on the trail because of its light weight, it takes clear shots that I consider as good as my canon 80d with a 100-400 mm lens. Sony has this 400hv that I use to take bird pictures are clear and sharp at the long side of the lens.

Reply
Apr 1, 2020 17:34:03   #
waliddle Loc: Washington State
 
I have a Canon Rebel T6 for my main camera but I still use my Canon SX120 as a pocket camera some times.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.