Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
1969 Nikon Price List
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 26, 2020 07:07:34   #
Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina
 
I would say his 1969 dollar is worth about 14 cents today...

CHG_CANON wrote:
Your 1969 US $1.00 is worth about $7.05 today. Some things don't change that much is seems, with Nikon F being about $1,551 for inflation alone.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 07:24:49   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
rdgreenwood wrote:
Yep, I remember it. And the prices seemed to be so high, I waited until I went to Japan where I bought my Nikkormat at the NX, with a f/2.0 lens, for $121.00. Everything’s relative.


I bought a pentax spotmatic in Subic Bay(Philippines) for $125 and it had the 50 mm F 1.4. Before leaving Vietnam Nam I bought 5, to bring back to FAMILY. RJM

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 07:26:43   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Wow!
I remember the prices at the base exchange from 1973 of the Nikon F with the FTN metering prism and 50mm f/2 lens and the Mamiya C-330. Both were $180. My parents bought me the camera of my choice for high school graduation. I went with the Mamiya. Back then I said it’s the last camera I’ll ever need! .........
Yeah, right!


My wife tells me that i say that, with every new camera purchase.LoL!!! RJM

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Mar 26, 2020 07:44:06   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
My mom and dad bought an F, the meter viewfinder, and a 50mm f/1.4 for a Christmas present in 1971. As I remember, the prices were similar to those shown.

Yes, I still have it and still use it.
--Bob
Pixelmaster wrote:
Do you remember this?

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 07:57:05   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
My father paid about $200 for a Minolta SRT-101, with a 50mm lens, during the early 1970s at a camera shop. I remember Vietnam Vets, said all SLR cameras were cheaper at military bases overseas. I would borrow that camera occasionally. It was my first and only experience with a SLR camera. That camera, some claimed, was as good as the Nikon. My father sold the SRT-101 around 2001. He gave me his tripod that is 40 years old now. I still have it. I now own a Nikon DSLR. Sony bought out Minolta. Since about 2006.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 07:58:39   #
Carnpo Loc: North Carolina
 
I bought my Nikkormat FTN 50mm 1.4 in 1972.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 07:58:53   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
I do. I bought my Nikon F body in Madrid, Spain in 1963 and it cost me at the time $250. It still works although I have not used it in some time.
Yes, prices are slightly higher for new cameras now.

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Mar 26, 2020 08:22:55   #
fourlocks Loc: Londonderry, NH
 
My girlfriend and I purchased a Nikkormat FTN with a zoom macro lens for a little under $400, in 1973. Expensive! We were married in 1974 and for our honeymoon, did a camping trip to Yellowstone (this was when his Rocky Mountain Highness ruled and it was a cool thing to do) for which we purchased the newly-created Audi Fox for about $4,800. It absolutely astonished our friends that we paid that much for a car. I don't think you could get an Audi bumper replaced for that price, now.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 08:23:54   #
vpeek1947 Loc: Louisville, Ky
 
I purchased a Yashica Lynx14E 1.4 in Korea 1969 - less than $100 bucks - its setting on a self in my photo office and it still works. Carried that thing all over Korea and took family photos for years.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 08:37:21   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Pixelmaster wrote:
Do you remember this?


My first Nikon camera was a 1969 Nikon FTN with the Nikon 105 2.5 mm lens.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 09:02:50   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Yes. That about when I bought mine. It seemed that most SLRs cost around $250 then. I sold it on eBay to someone in Dublin for $300 in 2005 .

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Mar 26, 2020 09:08:36   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
rdgreenwood wrote:
Yep, I remember it. And the prices seemed to be so high, I waited until I went to Japan where I bought my Nikkormat at the NX, with a f/2.0 lens, for $121.00. Everything’s relative.


Just curious how those look inflation adjusted.
Thank you.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 09:37:22   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Tomfl101 wrote:
This is great. I’m trying recall what the difference was between the Nikon F and the Photomic FTN. Anyone recall? Built in meter maybe?


Full name was Nikon F, Photomic FTn. I own one. Yes, the difference was the viewfinder. The standard Nikon F came with just an optical pentaprism viewfinder and NO meter. The Nikon F, Photomic FTn has the center-weighted meter-equipped viewfinder.

As I recall, there were at least five viewfinders for the Nikon F.

Mine was originally the FTn with 50mm f/1.4. It sold in the USA for $443 list, but few people paid that, unless they were wealthy or uninformed. Discounts of 20% or more were common then.

$443 in 1969 equates to roughly $3,135 in 2020, according to my inflation calculator app. That's why, as a 14-year old in 1969, I bought a Nikkormat FTn with 50mm f/1.4 instead. It was $237.95 at Altman's in Chicago (which equates to roughly $1684 in 2020). I had earned it by selling prints to classmates and the yearbook staff at my school (images made with a borrowed Canon FX).

I inherited the FTn in 1972, when my step-uncle died. He had bought it in Hong Kong, a week before his death. It had half a roll of exposed Ektachrome in it.

After living with about 20 different film cameras and 10 digital cameras over the years, I have to reflect that the Nikon FTn was elegant, rugged as a tank, precise... but awkward to use, and ergonomically challenging and quirky. The Nikon F3, on the other hand, was my favorite 35mm SLR of all time. I have one of those, too. I had two of them at one time. It was all I ever needed in a 35mm film camera.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 09:50:36   #
Pixelmaster Loc: New England
 
This may help as to what Nikon viewfinders were available.



Reply
Mar 26, 2020 09:52:45   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Pixelmaster wrote:
This may help as to what Nikon viewfinders were available.


Those were early finders for the Nikon F2 series.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.