JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Hey, as a BTW, is your upcoming Toronto photo shoot "essential cross-border travel?"

Angmo

Well, yes. It is business but the $25k shoot will have to wait. I’ve already referred them to a trusted photog. They are considering.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

Well Dennis, I didn't think I needed to acknowledge the acrimony on both sides of the aisle these days. It seems so obvious. However if you need it verbalized, the democrats are just as biased, if not more so than the Republicans, but I believe they have good reason to be.

I'll tell you why. It started with the Clinton impeachment. The Republicans. detested both Bill and Hillary Clinton. After the Whitewater bust, they trumped up something that was none of their business, a sexual encounter with Moniica Lewinski. I have no idea why they made a family affair into a national spectacle including impeachment. But unlike trump, Bill openly testified before congresss. Thats what got him in trouble. Trump would never testify under oath and he made sure no one familiar with his wrong doing would testify either. Trump could never testify under oath because he can't stop himself from lying.

Probably the next thing that causes democrats to cause distain for Republicans, besides the 8 or 9 fruitless Benghazi investigations, was caused by Mitch McConnell when he refused to give judge Garland a hearing saying the next president should nominate the next Supreme Court Justice. This was an unprecedented, despicable act by an unscrupulous ass. Now the is going around trying to get conservative judges (there shouldn't be conservative and liberal judges) at retirement age to retire so they can get younger ones appointed.

Probably the next thing that bothers democrats is the election. First there was the Comey innuendo that there was some classified information one of Hillary's aides former husband's computer and it was Hillary's fault. This happened 11 days before the election.

Now I know you hate to here this but Hillary did get just under 3 million more votes than Trump. I know this is not the fault of Republicans because it's in the constitution, but it still sticks in the craw of democracts.

Finally comes the Impeachment. Democrats knew from the beginning that they would not get 67 votes in the Senate, but they would get republicans on record for voting for acquittal. But, before that remember that the constitution tasks the House with investigating wrongdoing on the part of the president as part of the checks and balances and to prepare the Articles of Impeachment to be presented to the Senate

Now the last part. The House conducted the investigation. I know of no investigation where the defendant had people testify under oath about the case during the investigation. Therefore the whineing by Republicans that they did get people to testify during the investigation phase rings hallow since they really didn't want their people questioned at all. Then Mitch McConnell ramroded rules through the Senate which insured no witness would be supeoned and no documents would be presented in evidence and trump would be acquitted.

That is why democrats hold Republicans in such low esteem. Over the years they have played very dirty politicos.

This ends my participation in this discussion. I have pretty much refrained from name calling etc. except for calling Mitch McConnell an ass. I expect the same from others. I will not answer any posts about this. I may, however, read them.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Good lord how lame is that.

Show where Mueller said he found collusion ... after all, that was the purpose of the investigation.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

The purpose of the investigation is clearly outlined on page 11 of the Mueller Report. Have a look at it again, Mr Widely-Read, and show me where it says anything related to looking for collusion. Hint: it's not there.

FYI (I did your homework for you), the word "collusion" appears 23 times in the report, usually in quoted tweets by DJT. It is his favourite word regarding this whole incident, and it is his and Barr's conclusion, but not Mueller's.

Can you humbly admit failure on this one?

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

So you admit he found no evidence of collusion.

I accept your surrender.

”The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities ...”
Robert Mueller

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politico.com/amp/story/2019/03/24/breaking-news-barr-to-release-summary-of-mueller-report-1233771

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of conspiracy or coordination to charge criminality (not that he could have laid charges due to the OLC Opinion). Collusion per se was not investigated. So of course he did not find evidence of collusion.

You have some nerve to tear apart other people's posts for not expressing themselves clearly, and then you go and misinterpret statements and draw false conclusions to create an argument. You are a piece of work!!!

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Have you suffered a blow to the head from a fellow Canadian who mistook you for a baby seal?

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Nice deflection, serf. Address the point.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

A little slow on the edit.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

I did, I failed at stupiding it down enough for you.

Let me try again.

Mueller went to look for collusion.

He say he not find any.

You lie and say he do.

Me show that he say he no find any.

You say you like lie more than fact.

Me say you do.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Show me where Mueller's mandate was to find "collusion."

PS If you need a copy of the Mueller report I can direct you to it.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

So you are now arguing with your own argument.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Can you show me where I am in conflict with my argument? I think our audience may have gotten lost, so perhaps you would be so kind as to restate the issue in clear terms.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Sorry me can not stoopid it down nuff for you.