Looking to buy a new camera....
Jan 30, 2020 08:50:16 #
The FZ1000 can be had for around $600 whereas it was $900 when it came out 6 years ago. It is much better than the FZ300 if you are doing blow-ups above 8x10. Since you like hiking and nature, only you know if the weather sealing, lighter weight, less cost, further reach will be a higher priority than just the larger sensor of the FZ1000. If you are mainly showing the photos tp friends by media, probably no one will notice much difference between the quality of either sensor.
Jan 30, 2020 08:54:20 #
Diver Joe wrote:
I want to start off by saying that I found this s... (show quote)
Folks here will talk MP's and sensor size all day long, but take a look at this review and especially the images, and tell me you can't do anything you want to do with the FZ300:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63244070
Jan 30, 2020 09:07:59 #
Ksocha
Loc: Bethesda, MD
If you are a penny pincher, I have a very lightly used LUMIX FZ 300 that I bought for my wife. She hasn’t taken to photography, so I have no need for it.
I think it is flawless and I’m pretty sure we could make a deal.
I think it is flawless and I’m pretty sure we could make a deal.
Jan 30, 2020 09:43:39 #
mas24
Loc: Southern CA
JanSIrons wrote:
I checked LensRentals.com - they do rent the 1000 ... (show quote)
Unless, I missed previous negative remarks on the Sony RX10iv on this forum. You're the first to have a negative opinion on that camera.
Jan 30, 2020 09:58:11 #
mas24 wrote:
Unless, I missed previous negative remarks on the Sony RX10iv on this forum. You're the first to have a negative opinion on that camera.
Agreed! Tack sharp at 600mm!
Jan 30, 2020 10:00:08 #
Retina
Loc: Near Charleston,SC
rook2c4 wrote:
Don't forget to also consider ergonomics. Not all cameras feel the same, or are equally comfortable for everyone. A camera that is comfortable to operate (button and dial layout, weight distribution, overall shape and size, etc.) will result in a more enjoyable experience, which may possibly have a positive impact on the output.
Like longshadow's reply, I definitely agree. It may be worth whatever extra cost, or even a compromise in sensor size after trying out different models and brands. It certainly helps when a camera is easier to hold, adjust, and read settings in actual use.
Jan 30, 2020 10:34:18 #
Jan 30, 2020 10:41:40 #
I signed in after a long time, the first article I saw was exactly what I signed in for - I am looking for a new camera. However, I am most experienced with Nikon DSLRs. So considered them. But why, I thought. I went with Nikon body due to lenses I already had, but I don't even know if my current lenses will fit the new Nikon bodies. So am I still locked into Nikon? Unfortunately, due to arthritic hands/fingers my shooting is limited to 'auto' and I prefer to keep my 80-300mm telephoto lens. It works best for me in my individual shooting opportunity - landscape, scenery, sunrises and macro on occasion. Any and all suggestions, comments and recommendations are welcome. Trish
Jan 30, 2020 10:42:27 #
Diver Joe wrote:
I want to start off by saying that I found this s... (show quote)
"I am thinking a larger sensor is more valuable then the additional reach."
If you are more interested in landscape and environmental shots and less interested in distant wildlife shots, you are right. The larger sensor will serve better. If you think you really want to get up close and personal with birds and animals on your hikes, the reach could be important.
Jan 30, 2020 10:45:20 #
After much research and renting a Sony Rx10mk4 I made the purchase. I can tell you without exaggeration that the quality at full zoom is outstanding. I print 13x19 and they are as sharp as what comes out of my Sony A7rmk2. My only gripe is the weight and size, but I am getting used to it and love the results. By the way I am 94 years old and I make sure I have a shutter speed and ISO that helps to overcome a bit of camera shake
Jan 30, 2020 10:51:40 #
Picture Taker
Loc: Michigan Thumb
If you want to be comfortable with a camera, go to a store and handle the cameras. If the camera is not comfortable you will not stay in photography.
Jan 30, 2020 10:54:18 #
Floyd wrote:
As some here have suggested on other items, why not rent either for a few days to get the feel of both prior to purchasing.
Renting both cameras will run you around 70-80 total for a week. The more expensive camera (FZ1000) can be purchased for $600. So the rental would equal more than 10% of your highest possible purchase cost.
This assumes that your schedule is such that you can evaluate the two cameras within a week. If it would take you longer (as it would for me given work and my duties to she who must be obeyed) then the rental cost goes up.
Rental often works for pros who need a specific piece for a specific job who can then pass the cost on to the customer and/or deduct the cost from their taxes. It usually does not make sense for casual buyers as a method of evaluation.
Another route is purchasing from a reliable retailer who has a good return policy. B&H has a 30 day full refund return with no restocking fee in most cases.
Jan 30, 2020 11:08:04 #
jdub82 wrote:
I believe both of these cameras offer Image Stabilzation. Most super zoom bridge cameras offer some type of Image Stabilization built in. It would also be good to note that the FZ300 has just a 12MP sensor. The FZ1000 offers 18.1 megapixels. This could be a factor if the OP intends to make large prints. The FZ1000 with the 1" sensor is an an outstanding value for the purchase price. The only advantage of the FZ300, in my opinion, would be if there is a significant need for weather sealing.
The FZ1000 has a 20 MP sensor.
Jan 30, 2020 11:16:15 #
Jan 30, 2020 11:18:13 #
Ched49 wrote:
It's always a good idea to go with the larger sensor.
It really depends on the job. Many times it is better and many times it is not.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.