papaluv4gd wrote:
when I view some of the posts that are put up on the hog, many of them are very nice,some are outstanding, and some are just too over prossessed.
Now this is just my humble opinion.
Some of the posts are just too evenly lit,every shadow detail is available, trees and mountains are all just picture post card perfect. Now I have been around enough to know that scenic opportunities are rarely ,if ever perfectly illuminated. So...my thought is, am I the only one who is satisfied with capturing a given scene SOOC ?
I often shoot my scenics with both eyes open with the thought of capturing in camera exactly what is before me, or as close as I can get it given the broad spectrum of light falling on a given vista.
I'm afraid that there is so much PP of everything ,that what we all are exposed to now are all just personal renditions of what is or was actually there. Some post are so perfectly PP'd, that they take on the apperance of a lithograph rather than a photograph.
Example: taking a picture of the sun will always render the rest of the scene whofully under exposed, yet I see shots with the sun as evenly lit as the surrounding landscape. Yes, there are times when it is possible to shoot a sun scene and have some forground or backround lit. But not evenly. I have tried. something has to give.
I feel like a lone wolf trying to capture what I see as it is, while many are manipulating their shots to render them more perfect or "pleasing" to the eye.
With so much pp going on, it's very hard to know what is real anymore.
Just my observations and ramblings.
when I view some of the posts that are put up on t... (
show quote)
Definately food for thought, although I myself as a "Newbie" to Digital Photography have not learned the Skills of "Post-processing" my images. At 69 years old, I have been slow in learning all of the modern Photography Technology. I will require my Grandchildren to assist me, although they will need to have some real time and Patience in teaching me.π³ππ