Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Chimp or Not
Page <<first <prev 4 of 12 next> last>>
Oct 25, 2019 05:50:39   #
kymarto Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
 
I can only say that every professional news photographer that I worked with in Asia over the years reviewed what they shot immediately after taking the shots, unless they have to shoot something else at that moment. To not do so in the field, when one can at least sometimes redo the shot if necessary, is the height of both irresponsibility and folly. Of course this is less necessary when using mirrorless, which is WYSIWYG, but even then, reviewing the images when not distracted by actually taking the shot has enormous value.

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 05:51:56   #
kymarto Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
 
MrBob wrote:
Interesting responses... Perhaps the one I had not considered was the PC aspects of the term itself... Is it demeaning ? Should we banish it to the banishment bin along with " Taking the shot, capture, using Bulb, nifty fifty, or any other slang words that we normally use in our craft ? Is a bird Perching any diff. than a Chimp Chimping... Anyhoot, any conversation topic other than "which is better, Canon or Nikon" is refreshing.


Yes, it is a demeaning term, implying a mindless action. It is anything but. And anyway, Sony is better ;)

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 06:05:20   #
dave.m
 
I often 'pre-chimp'

With the superb live EVF on the EOS R I have one viewscreen which shows the histogram in real time so can apply exposure compensation and see the immediate effect

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2019 06:05:32   #
BlueMorel Loc: Southwest Michigan
 
If I didn't chimp I'd get a lot of all black or washed out shots while adjusting my settings in different lighting conditions. Or tilted or ill-composed. I don't review every shot, but it sure helps me try out different things to get the shot right.

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 06:06:20   #
suminblacky Loc: Mercer Pa.
 
I find it amusing that someone would be upset that using the word might offend a pack of monkeys. As for "chimping" ( a word now firmly enbedded in the English lauguage) I see it as a great improvement of modern technology over the old. No longer having to wait to see how your prints turn out is a great advantage. I got five film cameras mothballed in my closet that I'll never probably use again. Digital has breathed new life into the old art of photography.

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 06:22:53   #
kymarto Loc: Portland OR and Milan Italy
 
suminblacky wrote:
I find it amusing that someone would be upset that using the word might offend a pack of monkeys. As for "chimping" ( a word now firmly enbedded in the English lauguage) I see it as a great improvement of modern technology over the old. No longer having to wait to see how your prints turn out is a great advantage. I got five film cameras mothballed in my closet that I'll never probably use again. Digital has breathed new life into the old art of photography.


In the old days of 16mm film, we used to shoot a test shot at the beginning of the reel, which the lab would clip off and develop first, in order to calibrate development for the rest of the reel based on the reference values seen on that clip. We have come a long way.

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 06:55:50   #
foathog Loc: Greensboro, NC
 
I never do. I'd rather shoot 600 shots and then LATER find out that I screwed up.

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2019 07:07:55   #
srt101fan
 
Is an electronic viewfinder the ultimate chimping tool? Oh, the shame of looking through your viewfinder...😕

(By the way, the UHH spellchecker does not recognize "chimping", so it must not be a real word!)

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 07:17:03   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Practical view with which I agree.
LFingar wrote:
If you pay attention at events where there are professional photogs present you will see that many, perhaps most, don't hesitate to chimp when time allows. If your livelihood depends on you getting the right shot you want to be sure you actually got what you think you did.
I chimp quite frequently in order to be sure that I didn't induce motion blur, something that is quite easy to do, and to see if the settings I used actually produced the results I wanted. Changing a setting, such as aperture or exposure, can change the entire look of a photo.
If you pay attention at events where there are pro... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 07:18:06   #
suminblacky Loc: Mercer Pa.
 
I once read somewhere that photography could have started as early as the first half of the 1600's using the alchemy of that day and the camera obscrua. But it took another 200 years for someone to put it together and get it right. Imagine having pictures of those days. You see that in the last 20 years how digital has improved it makes you wonder where it will be in the next 20, 30 or 50. I wonder if they'll still be "chimping"?

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 07:34:49   #
Ollieboy
 
MrBob wrote:
This thought arose after reading a post on a user checking the LCD screen in bright light. Someone mentioned Chimping and I am just curious how many of you Chimp or not Chimp. Is there some sort of unwritten stigma attached to chimping that would flag you as a deplorable and not worthy of being recognized as a serious photographer or is it a useless endeavor that is just a waste of time ? Personally I like to Chimp and look at my capture; I make adjustments and move on. I fully understand the concept of " Getting it right the first time " and fully endorse that as it makes you a better photographer. Just curious as to WHY or WHY NOT you personally choose either approach. Maybe we can get a few humorous pages out of this.... Bob
This thought arose after reading a post on a user ... (show quote)


Why not chimp when needed? Unless your ego says your too good for that and never needed it when you shot film.😁😁😁

Reply
 
 
Oct 25, 2019 07:44:43   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
jerseymike wrote:
I am new to this. I cannot think for the life of me why this "chimping" thing even matters.


Reply
Oct 25, 2019 07:45:49   #
ELNikkor
 
Good film photographers used to spend a lot to get a polaroid back, buy polaroid film, and have the hassle of waiting for the polaroid film to process numerous times until they were sure they had the lighting just right before taking crucial shots, then changing the polaroid film back to the normal back and calculating the right settings based on a different ISO for the film. This was "chimping" the old way. Now, it is so convenient to check the shot in a second for FREE!

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 07:50:14   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I hardly ever "chimp". I know my cameras well enough that it's not necessary.

Now a funny story. When I got my first digital, I resigned myself to using that exclusively in order to learn the camera as best I could. I "chimped" everything I took, as it was a novelty. Then I took my Nikon F back out to shoot. First exposure, I looked at the back of the camera, out of a recently developed habit. I can't imagine how stupid that must have looked. I broke the habit immediately. To this day I still don't look at the back except to make adjustments.
--Bob
MrBob wrote:
This thought arose after reading a post on a user checking the LCD screen in bright light. Someone mentioned Chimping and I am just curious how many of you Chimp or not Chimp. Is there some sort of unwritten stigma attached to chimping that would flag you as a deplorable and not worthy of being recognized as a serious photographer or is it a useless endeavor that is just a waste of time ? Personally I like to Chimp and look at my capture; I make adjustments and move on. I fully understand the concept of " Getting it right the first time " and fully endorse that as it makes you a better photographer. Just curious as to WHY or WHY NOT you personally choose either approach. Maybe we can get a few humorous pages out of this.... Bob
This thought arose after reading a post on a user ... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 25, 2019 08:01:58   #
Toment Loc: FL, IL
 
MrBob wrote:
This thought arose after reading a post on a user checking the LCD screen in bright light. Someone mentioned Chimping and I am just curious how many of you Chimp or not Chimp. Is there some sort of unwritten stigma attached to chimping that would flag you as a deplorable and not worthy of being recognized as a serious photographer or is it a useless endeavor that is just a waste of time ? Personally I like to Chimp and look at my capture; I make adjustments and move on. I fully understand the concept of " Getting it right the first time " and fully endorse that as it makes you a better photographer. Just curious as to WHY or WHY NOT you personally choose either approach. Maybe we can get a few humorous pages out of this.... Bob
This thought arose after reading a post on a user ... (show quote)


There, there, chimping is ok...😀😀😀

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.