David Pakman analyzes - - interesting (and likely calculated) how Trump equates himself with George Washington - - you know, the president who just "couldn't tell a lie" !!!
Watch "Crazed, Desperate Trump Calls Constitution "Phony"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/akkgQD3xBEA
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
EllieLady wrote:
David Pakman analyzes - - interesting (and likely calculated) how Trump equates himself with George Washington - - you know, the president who just "couldn't tell a lie" !!!
Watch "Crazed, Desperate Trump Calls Constitution "Phony"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/akkgQD3xBEAJust in case you can't read. The emoluments clause applies to gifts/funds from FOREIGN governments. NOT things earned from domestic sources. The president receives a salary for his services, the emolument clause does not apply because it't not bfrom a foreign source. With regard to the Doral mtg. Trump was not going to charge any foreign entity for the event bat the doral so the emoluments clause would not have applied. So therefore a president is entitled to earn mon ey from domestic sources, as did Washington. So in that respect Trump was accurate in his comparison. So if you learn to read maybe this vwill be understandable to you as well as the idiot you-tube comentator
boberic wrote:
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments clause applies to gifts/funds from FOREIGN governments. NOT things earned from domestic sources. The president receives a salary for his services, the emolument clause does not apply because it't not bfrom a foreign source. With regard to the Doral mtg. Trump was not going to charge any foreign entity for the event bat the doral so the emoluments clause would not have applied. So therefore a president is entitled to earn mon ey from domestic sources, as did Washington. So in that respect Trump was accurate in his comparison. So if you learn to read maybe this vwill be understandable to you as well as the idiot you-tube comentator
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments claus... (
show quote)
You ask for way too much. Dems just post crap, they don't care about the Truth.
boberic wrote:
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments clause applies to gifts/funds from FOREIGN governments. NOT things earned from domestic sources. The president receives a salary for his services, the emolument clause does not apply because it't not bfrom a foreign source. With regard to the Doral mtg. Trump was not going to charge any foreign entity for the event bat the doral so the emoluments clause would not have applied. So therefore a president is entitled to earn mon ey from domestic sources, as did Washington. So in that respect Trump was accurate in his comparison. So if you learn to read maybe this vwill be understandable to you as well as the idiot you-tube comentator
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments claus... (
show quote)
Ummm, that's neither "all" nor "only"...
Just in case
you CAN read:
"Foreign AND Domestic Emoluments CLAUSES"
boberic wrote:
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments clause applies to gifts/funds from FOREIGN governments. NOT things earned from domestic sources. The president receives a salary for his services, the emolument clause does not apply because it't not bfrom a foreign source. With regard to the Doral mtg. Trump was not going to charge any foreign entity for the event bat the doral so the emoluments clause would not have applied. So therefore a president is entitled to earn mon ey from domestic sources, as did Washington. So in that respect Trump was accurate in his comparison. So if you learn to read maybe this vwill be understandable to you as well as the idiot you-tube comentator
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments claus... (
show quote)
The Domestic Emoluments Clause, Article II, Section 1,
boberic wrote:
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments clause applies to gifts/funds from FOREIGN governments. NOT things earned from domestic sources. The president receives a salary for his services, the emolument clause does not apply because it't not bfrom a foreign source. With regard to the Doral mtg. Trump was not going to charge any foreign entity for the event bat the doral so the emoluments clause would not have applied. So therefore a president is entitled to earn mon ey from domestic sources, as did Washington. So in that respect Trump was accurate in his comparison. So if you learn to read maybe this vwill be understandable to you as well as the idiot you-tube comentator
Just in case you can't read. The emoluments claus... (
show quote)
Trumpy was forced into that offer by the outrage that followed his announcement that the G7 would be held at his resort.
The full text of: 'The Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution" - - from Congressional Research Services - - page 2 of 2
(Sorry - - upload problem - - still trying - - since 2:36 PM, I've simply tried to upload a screen shot of p. 2, but I continue receiving a msg that the site is unreachable. Clearly the site, this site, is VERY reachable, as I am posting and adding other attachments.
When I run out of my 1-hour edit window, if you want to view p. 2, you'll need to use the link.)
EllieLady wrote:
David Pakman analyzes - - interesting (and likely calculated) how Trump equates himself with George Washington - - you know, the president who just "couldn't tell a lie" !!!
Watch "Crazed, Desperate Trump Calls Constitution "Phony"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/akkgQD3xBEAWashington was the richest of all presidents combined. He had the most land. Mind boggling.
Donald is nothing compared to George.
jcboy3 wrote:
Trumpy was forced into that offer by the outrage that followed his announcement that the G7 would be held at his resort.
Trumpy? You still in pre school little boy?
EllieLady wrote:
David Pakman analyzes - - interesting (and likely calculated) how Trump equates himself with George Washington - - you know, the president who just "couldn't tell a lie" !!!
Watch "Crazed, Desperate Trump Calls Constitution "Phony"" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/akkgQD3xBEA Liar, Trump was not calling the Constitutional emoluments clause phony, he was talking about the fake claim that he was violating the emoluments clause which he wasn't.
EyeSawYou wrote:
Liar, Trump was not calling the Constitutional emoluments clause phony, he was talking about the fake claim that he was violating the emoluments clause which he wasn't.
That should t even require an explanation.
Elaine2025 wrote:
That should t even require an explanation.
It appears to be that way for these Lefty liars but they will still believe what they want anyway.
[quote=Kraken Democrats are liars that’s for sure [/quote]
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.