Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Newbie Intro / Camera Suggestions??
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Sep 20, 2019 00:29:12   #
WAstinkbug Loc: Silverdale, WA, U.S.A.
 
BJW wrote:
Hi Angela
Welcome back to photography.
I own and use several brands from heavy DSLR to light pocketable compacts. Given your physical limitations, camera and lens weight will be an important consideration. For that reason, you should consider a MFT ( micro four thirds) which are very light and compact. I have the Panasonic Lumix G85 which is very easy to use. It has a vast array of available lenses. Image stabilization in camera and in native lenses is excellent. The camera’s fully articulated rear screen will be very helpful to accommodate difficult angle shots. Image quality is excellent. The G85 has now been upgraded to the G95 but I don’t believe it’s a major improvement. The G85 is well within your budget, the G95 just under $1000 if you want to splurge. Have fun!
BJW
Hi Angela br Welcome back to photography. br I own... (show quote)



Great choice! (Like a heavier built G7 with weather sealing.)

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 07:53:22   #
Bill Koepsel Loc: Oconomowoc, Wisconsin
 
I was in a similar position and chose the Canon 5d ii. It is a wonderful camera and takes great photos. It is an older camera but I worth looking in too.....check YouTube.....

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 07:58:46   #
hj Loc: Florida
 
Junebugg71 wrote:
 One last thing....I am a paraplegic and have very weak wrists and shoulders, so a camera that isn't super heavy would also be ideal. 
Thanks!! 😊


Glad you're back to a wonderful hobby. Considering your comment about wrists and shoulders, I think weight of camera outfit is a distinct necessity. You can get a slightly lighter camera but by the time you venture into an array of lenses you will be adding even more weight and an eternal increasing cost as you need/want more lenses. I am surprised that more UHH members have not encouraged you to look at an all-in-one camera such as the Canon GX7 Mark II, GX9 Mark II or the Panasonic Lumix ZS series such as ZS70, all of which are measured in ounces not pounds. You might even consider a digital bridge camera with zoom. These cameras all now include the same dial controls to allow for shutter, aperture, manual etc settings. Unfortunately some feel only a DSLR will do and that is not the case. A weighty DSLR might soon discourage you from the activity or at least limit the amount of time you spend doing it. Please don't assume you must have a DSLR with mounting lenses and mounting costs until you have looked at and handled the wonderful selections of advanced digital cameras with a built in lens which also zooms. We wish you success in your return to photography and believe you will be amazed at your digital opportunities.

Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 08:38:35   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Junebugg71 wrote:
I have decided on the Canon SL2 for my "beginner" camera. It comes with the EF-S 18-55mm f/4-5.6 is STM Lens, 0.43x Super Wide Angle Aux Lens, and 2.2x Telephoto Aux Lens....all of which I know nothing about.

As previously mentioned in my Intro post, I am interested in Macro photography. I have been watching YouTube and see little "hacks" to get Macro shots, without having to purchase a dedicated Macro lens right now.

I've seen videos with extension tubes and a reversal ring, allowing me to flip the kit lens for closer shots. Now, I understand the quality may not be the same as with a dedicated macro lens, and I will work on getting one of those....but for now....which do you all think I would be able to get the most decent shots with, extension tubes, a reversal ring, or...???

I know I need a 58mm diameter, but other than that, are there specific tubes for the SL2, or are all ETs compatible with all cameras??

Thanks.
Angela
I have decided on the Canon SL2 for my "begin... (show quote)


Angela,
I see from your post on another thread you have made a choice. The SL2 will serve you well for several years and leave you positioned to upgrade later.
Good luck.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 08:39:25   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Angela,
I see from your post on another thread you have made a choice. The SL2 will serve you well for several years and leave you positioned to upgrade later.
Good luck.


Reply
Sep 20, 2019 09:37:23   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
hj wrote:
Glad you're back to a wonderful hobby. Considering your comment about wrists and shoulders, I think weight of camera outfit is a distinct necessity. You can get a slightly lighter camera but by the time you venture into an array of lenses you will be adding even more weight and an eternal increasing cost as you need/want more lenses. I am surprised that more UHH members have not encouraged you to look at an all-in-one camera such as the Canon GX7 Mark II, GX9 Mark II or the Panasonic Lumix ZS series such as ZS70, all of which are measured in ounces not pounds. You might even consider a digital bridge camera with zoom. These cameras all now include the same dial controls to allow for shutter, aperture, manual etc settings. Unfortunately some feel only a DSLR will do and that is not the case. A weighty DSLR might soon discourage you from the activity or at least limit the amount of time you spend doing it. Please don't assume you must have a DSLR with mounting lenses and mounting costs until you have looked at and handled the wonderful selections of advanced digital cameras with a built in lens which also zooms. We wish you success in your return to photography and believe you will be amazed at your digital opportunities.
Glad you're back to a wonderful hobby. Considerin... (show quote)
Sensorsize is the primary determinant of weight, which is why some members suggested MFT cameras.

If the OP is happy, we are happy.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 09:41:32   #
jdub82 Loc: Northern California
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Angela,
I see from your post on another thread you have made a choice. The SL2 will serve you well for several years and leave you positioned to upgrade later.
Good luck.



Reply
 
 
Sep 20, 2019 10:18:51   #
ecrocker
 
Angela, since you live in eastern NC, there is an excellent camera store in Greenville, NC ASAP Photo, I have bought cameras, lens, they have a good inventory and friendly and easy to talk with.
elmer crocker
custom photography
kenly nc

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 07:51:13   #
Tom DePuy Loc: Waxhaw, N.C.
 
Junebugg71 wrote:
Hello everyone! My name is Angela. I am from Eastern North Carolina, and just joined UH today. 

I am a "reborn novice", LOL. By that I mean, I took photography classes in college and at the time did very well, but that was 30 years ago and with a manual Pentax K1000. Needless to say, I have forgotten everything I learned in college, and cameras are quite a bit more advanced than what I learned with. 

I want to venture back into photography, and would primarily be taking "everyday" photos of my family. However, I am also extremely interested in macro photography of our beautiful oceans, wildlife, and bugs/insects. 

My max budget is between $600-700.
I would like a camera that is easy to use for a beginner, but also one that I can eventually grow with. Looking at bundles on Amazon, and see some with the 4 pc macro close up kit with +1, +2, +4, and +10 magnification and am wondering if they would work for what I'm wanting to do. Also, in reading from UH, have seen several posts stating that the bundle lenses are no good, and suggest using a STM lens instead of what's included in the bundle. I have NO CLUE what a STM lens is, or what the differences between those and the bundle ones are. Basically, I am LOST, and need input on what camera would meet my needs. 

One last thing....I am a paraplegic and have very weak wrists and shoulders, so a camera that isn't super heavy would also be ideal. 

Any suggestions within my budget range would be MUCH appreciated. 

Thanks!! 😊
Hello everyone! My name is Angela. I am from East... (show quote)


Welcome to the UHH forum, Angela
Fellow North Carolinian here, Charlotte area.Waxhaw
Enjoy

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 17:04:04   #
topcat Loc: Alameda, CA
 
Don't worry about the kit lenses. They are good for what they are. They can keep you shooting until, and if, you decide you need a better lens.
Look at the reviews online, the kit lenses are a great place to start.

As for the cameras, maybe consider the Sony a6XXX series, they are a bit smaller and give up nothing.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 17:21:50   #
Bill P
 
topcat wrote:
Don't worry about the kit lenses. They are good for what they are. They can keep you shooting until, and if, you decide you need a better lens.
Look at the reviews online, the kit lenses are a great place to start.

As for the cameras, maybe consider the Sony a6XXX series, they are a bit smaller and give up nothing.


Unusually rational response.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2020 15:15:24   #
k2edm Loc: FN32AD
 
Just to sturr the pot a bit: I finally got a cell phone with a built in camera. perhaps due to the small size of the lens, the depth of field of the photos is hugh. While I never will discard my canon 5 mrk4 and its lenses ($5k), for the dif in price, that little telephone camera takes pretty good photos...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.