Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
I am now doing "stacking"
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 22, 2019 21:31:14   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
This gets into a question I have about the Helicon FB Tube . . .
Not sure if that is right. The longer the lens, the smaller the number should be (that seems counter-intuitive to a lot of users.) The tube then will automatically calculate the focus increments for any f stop you choose on the camera. I set the tube to the recommended step number (smaller numbers are a smaller turn of the focus ring, not a smaller number of shots), tested that on an angled page of text, and then decided to go with a somewhat smaller step number. I repeated that a couple of times until I was happy with the overlap. No matter the aperture, it then works and you don't have to reset it every time you change the f stop.

A smaller step number means a smaller step of the focus ring, not a smaller number of steps.

I shot a flower the other day that was about 1/8" and it took 32 shots if I remember. As magnification is increased, the number of shots to get through the subject dramatically increases. At 1:3 - 1:1 magnification I need 15-35 shots. When I add the Raynox 250 is when I get up over 40, and of course the deeper the subject the more shots needed, so there is that variable as well. I shot an Iris bloom last Spring, a 4" wide (and 4" deep) subject filling the frame, and that took 68 shots. I don't remember the aperture - probably f/11 which I use a lot - so my example is not all that definitive but it may give you some idea. Mike

Reply
Aug 22, 2019 21:46:28   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
I've seen videos where fellows have placed open faced and open bottomed clear plastic boxes around plants to still them for focus stacking.
Interesting idea that hadn't occurred to me. If you can remember where you saw that video... Mike

Reply
Aug 24, 2019 08:22:12   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Interesting idea that hadn't occurred to me. If you can remember where you saw that video...
This is one set-up that I know about: https://www.flickr.com/photos/andredekesel/22419800486/in/album-72157631817963808/. Looking closely, the enclosure is simply a translucent container with a glass back.

Reply
 
 
Aug 24, 2019 10:26:38   #
naturepics43 Loc: Hocking Co. Ohio - USA
 
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
Could I increase the step size at these apertures by a factor of 10 and get a good stack?
Don't know if this will answer you question, but Zerene will let you stack every 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc. frame. When you start to see banding, you've went far enough. Load your flower bud stack & Go to: Options>Preferences>Pre-procesing and tic the box "Stack every Nth frame. Change the number and run a new stack.

Reply
Aug 24, 2019 10:28:26   #
Cwilson341 Loc: Central Florida
 
naturepics43 wrote:
Don't know if this will answer you question, but Zerene will let you stack every 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc. frame. When you start to see banding, you've went far enough. Load your flower bud stack & Go to: Options>Preferences>Pre-procesing and tic the box "Stack every Nth frame. Change the number and run a new stack.
That’s a feature I hadn’t discovered. Thank you!

Reply
Aug 24, 2019 11:46:30   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
This is one set-up that I know about: https://www.flickr.com/photos/andredekesel/22419800486/in/album-72157631817963808/. Looking closely, the enclosure is simply a translucent container with a glass back.
Thanks Mark. That would work. Mike

Reply
Aug 28, 2019 08:02:24   #
cactuspic Loc: Dallas, TX
 
Mark, on the Zerene website, they give the depth of field at a given magnification and f/stop. (Sorry, you may have given the magnification and I missed it). The total number of images seems extremely high if you are at 1:1, but reasonable at 3:1. I believe Zerene has a feature that you can select every other or every third image, but I am not at my main computer to check. If you ran such a test, look for banding to see if the intervals in the every other or every third image are insufficiently close.

In any case, keep up the good work.

Irwin

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.