Designdweeb wrote:
Please continue, which comments?
I'm not going to do your homework for you. Google it. Many anti-Jewish, racist, anti-American comments have been made by these 4 women. Omar is just plain evil.
Angmo wrote:
Evil leftie Dems attitude against anyone they hate for any reason
Can’t help but notice the left cannot explain the racism.
They must be playing the race card as a group.
yhtomit wrote:
Can’t help but notice the left cannot explain the racism.
They must be playing the race card as a group.
That's because "anything they don't like" would not fly...
yhtomit wrote:
You need to keep up on current events. The Mueller investigation found him innocent.
What’s it like to be wrong for two years and counting and Sean Hannity,Rush Limbaugh, me and the rest of us deplorables be right....?
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are entertainers, columnists at best, funded to the tune of millions by dark money, they are not journalists!
Please, the Mueller Report did not find him innocent, on the contrary, it found that there are 10 points that could not be declared so, but the limits of the jurisdiction, the authority of the report's team have to leave those points to Congress to investigate, and it initiated IIRC 14 other investigations for the (NY) Southern District to pursue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_ReportVolume I of the report concludes that the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities" and did not pursue charges for others beyond Manafort and Gates under statutes governing conspiracy or foreign agents.[4][5] Investigators ultimately had an incomplete picture of what happened due to communications that were encrypted, deleted or unsaved, as well as testimony that was false, incomplete or declined.[6][7][8] However, the report stated that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[9][10][11] It lists two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election. Firstly, a social media campaign by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) which supported the Trump presidential campaign, attacked the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, and aimed to “provoke and amplify political and social discord".[12][13][14] Secondly, Russian military intelligence agency GRU conducted computer hacking and strategically released damaging material stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations.[15][16][17] The campaign is further stated to have "welcomed" this ongoing interference as they “expected [to] benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts”.[18][19][20] It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[21] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] During the investigation, the special counsel recommended the indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his former deputy Rick Gates, and they were found guilty of criminal offenses stemming from their prior lobbying work for the Ukrainian Party of Regions. Mueller later stated that his investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".[22]
Volume II of the report addresses obstruction of justice. The investigation intentionally took an approach that could not result in a judgment that Trump committed a crime.[23][24][25] The special counsel refrained from making a judgment about whether to criminally charge Trump because investigators abided by an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that a sitting president cannot stand trial,[26][27][28] and feared that charges would affect Trump's governing and possibly preempt his impeachment.[24][27][29] Consistent with standing DOJ policy,[30] investigators felt it would be unfair to accuse Trump of a crime without charges and without a trial in which he could clear his name.[26][27][31] As such, the investigation "does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him",[13][32] as investigators were not confident that Trump was innocent after examining his intent and actions.[33][34][35][36]
Designdweeb wrote:
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are entertainers, columnists at best, funded to the tune of millions by dark money, they are not journalists!
Please, the Mueller Report did not find him innocent, on the contrary, it found that there are 10 points that could not be declared so, but the limits of the jurisdiction, the authority of the report's team have to leave those points to Congress to investigate, and it initiated IIRC 14 other investigations for the (NY) Southern District to pursue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_ReportVolume I of the report concludes that the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities" and did not pursue charges for others beyond Manafort and Gates under statutes governing conspiracy or foreign agents.[4][5] Investigators ultimately had an incomplete picture of what happened due to communications that were encrypted, deleted or unsaved, as well as testimony that was false, incomplete or declined.[6][7][8] However, the report stated that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[9][10][11] It lists two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election. Firstly, a social media campaign by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) which supported the Trump presidential campaign, attacked the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, and aimed to “provoke and amplify political and social discord".[12][13][14] Secondly, Russian military intelligence agency GRU conducted computer hacking and strategically released damaging material stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations.[15][16][17] The campaign is further stated to have "welcomed" this ongoing interference as they “expected [to] benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts”.[18][19][20] It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[21] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] During the investigation, the special counsel recommended the indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his former deputy Rick Gates, and they were found guilty of criminal offenses stemming from their prior lobbying work for the Ukrainian Party of Regions. Mueller later stated that his investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".[22]
Volume II of the report addresses obstruction of justice. The investigation intentionally took an approach that could not result in a judgment that Trump committed a crime.[23][24][25] The special counsel refrained from making a judgment about whether to criminally charge Trump because investigators abided by an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that a sitting president cannot stand trial,[26][27][28] and feared that charges would affect Trump's governing and possibly preempt his impeachment.[24][27][29] Consistent with standing DOJ policy,[30] investigators felt it would be unfair to accuse Trump of a crime without charges and without a trial in which he could clear his name.[26][27][31] As such, the investigation "does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him",[13][32] as investigators were not confident that Trump was innocent after examining his intent and actions.[33][34][35][36]
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are en... (
show quote)
If you believe this crap, you are definitely a democrat. Do you really think that if Trump had done anything wrong, like farted inappropriately they would have let it go? The best Mueller, (Comeys Buddy) could do is smoke and mirrors to keep the dems salivating like rabid dogs. And it worked.
Every sane person knows that if Trump had done anything there would have been charges like the dimocraps drooled over for two years and it was a big nothing burger. Innuendo was the best the they could come up with.
Bill P wrote:
How about telling brown skinned American citizens that they need to "Go back where they came from" because they look different and have unusual names.
Look different? have unusual names? where the f**K did that come from? YOU I'll bet.....The President did NOT say anything about LOOKS or NAMES......well here is a name for ya.....your a CLOD!
trainspotter wrote:
Look different? have unusual names? where the f**K did that come from? YOU I'll bet.....The President did NOT say anything about LOOKS or NAMES......well here is a name for ya.....your a CLOD!
Trainspotter, Bill P knows he made all that crap up. It is all democraps have left, is to lie and make it sound like Trump said something that he didn't say. Then like little sheeple the democraps all jump on the band wagon and parrot each other. It does not bother them to lie, cheat steal, to get their way. Look at the lies little Frankie tells. The dems are all the same, because they are so dishonest, they think everyone else is. You know dems, accuse other of what you yourself are doing.
retap wrote:
"Go back to where you came from" are code words used for generations against Irish immigrants, Jews, African-Americans and now Latinos. Leave my neighborhood, my city or "my" country, like the speaker owns it. In today's world, it is hard to determine where "go back to" really is. IMMIGRATION (yes, there is a problem) has been made the red herring to take focus away from the environment, healthcare, tariffs, automation, infrastructure, and the list goes on. People thought this guy was going to solve it all. Eliminating Roe v Wade, environmental regulations, affordable health care, reliable allies, and the list goes on does not make America great-it sure will not make it Great again. I really don't like that frame of reference because it reflects back to a mythic past that never really existed. Our nation is a work in progress but we have been back tracking in the last three years.
Anyone ever use the stick on uv filters for Lumix point and shoots (see, this is what this forum is supposed to be about).
"Go back to where you came from" are cod... (
show quote)
Amazing that it seems prior to Obama there were no code words. Now Left Wingers seem able to pick any phrase they want and say it is a coded phrase against some minority group. Of course when all four members speak out against whites, ICE, Border Patrol, President Trump and America it is all well and good with you Left Wing Socialists. Not one of you sticks up for America or Americans. Why is that?
Dennis
alx wrote:
Glad to see you are still the same old Elaine.
Fascist racists never do change, they just call names.
Ignorance isn’t a bad name for Left Wingers. It is the common denominator.
Dennis
Designdweeb wrote:
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are entertainers, columnists at best, funded to the tune of millions by dark money, they are not journalists!
Please, the Mueller Report did not find him innocent, on the contrary, it found that there are 10 points that could not be declared so, but the limits of the jurisdiction, the authority of the report's team have to leave those points to Congress to investigate, and it initiated IIRC 14 other investigations for the (NY) Southern District to pursue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_ReportVolume I of the report concludes that the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities" and did not pursue charges for others beyond Manafort and Gates under statutes governing conspiracy or foreign agents.[4][5] Investigators ultimately had an incomplete picture of what happened due to communications that were encrypted, deleted or unsaved, as well as testimony that was false, incomplete or declined.[6][7][8] However, the report stated that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[9][10][11] It lists two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election. Firstly, a social media campaign by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) which supported the Trump presidential campaign, attacked the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, and aimed to “provoke and amplify political and social discord".[12][13][14] Secondly, Russian military intelligence agency GRU conducted computer hacking and strategically released damaging material stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations.[15][16][17] The campaign is further stated to have "welcomed" this ongoing interference as they “expected [to] benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts”.[18][19][20] It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[21] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] During the investigation, the special counsel recommended the indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his former deputy Rick Gates, and they were found guilty of criminal offenses stemming from their prior lobbying work for the Ukrainian Party of Regions. Mueller later stated that his investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".[22]
Volume II of the report addresses obstruction of justice. The investigation intentionally took an approach that could not result in a judgment that Trump committed a crime.[23][24][25] The special counsel refrained from making a judgment about whether to criminally charge Trump because investigators abided by an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that a sitting president cannot stand trial,[26][27][28] and feared that charges would affect Trump's governing and possibly preempt his impeachment.[24][27][29] Consistent with standing DOJ policy,[30] investigators felt it would be unfair to accuse Trump of a crime without charges and without a trial in which he could clear his name.[26][27][31] As such, the investigation "does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him",[13][32] as investigators were not confident that Trump was innocent after examining his intent and actions.[33][34][35][36]
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are en... (
show quote)
So you are telling us with a straight face that a team of trained investigators headed up by one of the FBI’s best investigators was not able to come up with a crime so Left it to a team of Liberal run untrained investigators with Nadler in charge.
As an ex cop who has done a few investigations over the years that is not how law enforcement works in America. A case is not presented to a prosecutor with a note saying, We didn’t find anything but see what you can do. If the elements of the crime are not met then no crime occurred. It does not get simpler than that. This whole ball of bullshit is nothing but an attempt by the Left to keep Trump in a negative light until the election.
Dennis
Designdweeb wrote:
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are entertainers, columnists at best, funded to the tune of millions by dark money, they are not journalists!
Please, the Mueller Report did not find him innocent, on the contrary, it found that there are 10 points that could not be declared so, but the limits of the jurisdiction, the authority of the report's team have to leave those points to Congress to investigate, and it initiated IIRC 14 other investigations for the (NY) Southern District to pursue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_ReportVolume I of the report concludes that the investigation did not find sufficient evidence that the campaign "coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities" and did not pursue charges for others beyond Manafort and Gates under statutes governing conspiracy or foreign agents.[4][5] Investigators ultimately had an incomplete picture of what happened due to communications that were encrypted, deleted or unsaved, as well as testimony that was false, incomplete or declined.[6][7][8] However, the report stated that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election occurred "in sweeping and systematic fashion" and "violated U.S. criminal law".[9][10][11] It lists two methods by which Russia attempted to influence the election. Firstly, a social media campaign by the Internet Research Agency (IRA) which supported the Trump presidential campaign, attacked the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, and aimed to “provoke and amplify political and social discord".[12][13][14] Secondly, Russian military intelligence agency GRU conducted computer hacking and strategically released damaging material stolen from the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations.[15][16][17] The campaign is further stated to have "welcomed" this ongoing interference as they “expected [to] benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts”.[18][19][20] It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government,[21] about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations.[4] During the investigation, the special counsel recommended the indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his former deputy Rick Gates, and they were found guilty of criminal offenses stemming from their prior lobbying work for the Ukrainian Party of Regions. Mueller later stated that his investigation's conclusion on Russian interference "deserves the attention of every American".[22]
Volume II of the report addresses obstruction of justice. The investigation intentionally took an approach that could not result in a judgment that Trump committed a crime.[23][24][25] The special counsel refrained from making a judgment about whether to criminally charge Trump because investigators abided by an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that a sitting president cannot stand trial,[26][27][28] and feared that charges would affect Trump's governing and possibly preempt his impeachment.[24][27][29] Consistent with standing DOJ policy,[30] investigators felt it would be unfair to accuse Trump of a crime without charges and without a trial in which he could clear his name.[26][27][31] As such, the investigation "does not conclude that the President committed a crime"; however, "it also does not exonerate him",[13][32] as investigators were not confident that Trump was innocent after examining his intent and actions.[33][34][35][36]
The likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are en... (
show quote)
Sure they are journalists, they got it right didn’t they?
“it also does not exonerate him”, is something fresh and brand new which is being tested by the investigation of the investigation...nice try though.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
ricardo7 wrote:
From the New Yorker:
Since the G.O.P. is confined to a state of what seems like permanent vassalage to Trump and his maga supporters, the final development was perhaps the most surprising, and it provided an answer to a question that has been hanging for at least two and half years: Just how far does the President have to go before his supine Party colleagues on Capitol Hill muster the independence to register some semblance of a protest?
Congress, it's time for all to speak out against racism!!
From the New Yorker: br br Since the G.O.P. is co... (
show quote)
I found the four congresswomen to be the racists as they immediately assumed Trump was tweeting them because he was white and they weren’t.....
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
Bill P wrote:
How about telling brown skinned American citizens that they need to "Go back where they came from" because they look different and have unusual names.
Well.....you’re just lying and you know it.
Elaine2025 wrote:
If you believe this crap, you are definitely a democrat. Do you really think that if Trump had done anything wrong, like farted inappropriately they would have let it go? The best Mueller, (Comeys Buddy) could do is smoke and mirrors to keep the dems salivating like rabid dogs. And it worked.
Every sane person knows that if Trump had done anything there would have been charges like the dimocraps drooled over for two years and it was a big nothing burger. Innuendo was the best the they could come up with.
If you believe this crap, you are definitely a dem... (
show quote)
Is the Mueller Report the crap, or the training and professional credentials of Hannity and Limbaugh the crap?
And I'm hardly a Democrat, but I lived in NYC for decades, and have been both amused and horrified by the Trump family ideals and behavior for as long...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
