Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
FZ 200 VS SX 40
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Sep 4, 2012 13:19:05   #
Hunter Lou 1947 Loc: Minnesota
 
sarge69 wrote:
I have the SX40HS and it is great. Except for the annoying buttons too near the thumb rest.

Sarge69


Some of the pictures using full digital on SX40







Reply
Sep 4, 2012 13:21:32   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Hunter Lou 1947 wrote:
sarge69 wrote:
I have the SX40HS and it is great. Except for the annoying buttons too near the thumb rest.

Sarge69


NICE!!! Great examples!!

Reply
Sep 4, 2012 13:35:05   #
Juggalo
 
Sony Cybershot HX200V

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2012 14:01:02   #
Old Sarge Loc: Moore, OK
 
tdklex wrote:
I've read quite a bit on these two and am going to buy one or the other soon. Although the SX 40 has 840 max zoom and the FZ 200 has 600 at f2.8, isn't it true that with the FZ 200 you can double the max zoom to 1200, making it longer than the 840 of the SX 40?


Again the Camera Wars, Make up your own mind. That is what I did when I bought the SX40. Then you will have no one to blame or praise but yourself. By the way, one of the smartest camera buys I ever made, but don't take my word for it. Decide for yourself.

Reply
Sep 4, 2012 14:14:33   #
CanonJC
 
Hunter Lou 1947 wrote:
sarge69 wrote:
I have the SX40HS and it is great. Except for the annoying buttons too near the thumb rest.

Sarge69


Some of the pictures using full digital on SX40


Great shoot! SX40 just shoot alike DSLR. Expectly SX40 is saving lot of $$ than DSLR-800mm lens. :wink:

Reply
Sep 4, 2012 14:54:34   #
cudakite Loc: San Antonio
 
marcomarks wrote:
Donwitz wrote:
I did a quick internet search, and the Canon wins. See

http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-SX40-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200

AND, its cheaper!


I don't see any way to call the Canon a winner. I'm not saying it's a loser but it doesn't dominate the comparison at all. The author of that article is clearly biased toward Canon. The Canon seems to have better movie features
(Whoopty-doo. Personally I don't care because I use a still camera for stills and that's a still camera's main function), has four supposed advantages which are even stated as being the same or almost the same so they're not really advantages at all. It doesn't shoot RAW and only features a longer zoom and a lower price. That's it - longer zoom and currently lower price. Big deal.

The Panasonic has a very definite advantage with constant f/2.8 across the zoom range. I also really enjoy Leica glass although the Canon glass is just fine. Those are BIG advantages when doing a side by side comparision - not something trivial to pass over in a list or not mention at all. The two cameras even use completely different sensors that can't be compared with a simple MP number - which again were virtually identical numbers anyway.

That review is lame and just a spec comparison that provides absolutely nothing of value to shop with. It's very possible the author never touched either camera and did the article from spec sheets on company websites. I haven't seen a real hands-on reviews of the Panasonic yet except reviewers fondling a prototype at an electronics show. When extensive side-by-side reviews are available then we can start to make real assessments.

The SX-40 also is now at a street price that is much lower because it's not a new model. Its retail is higher than it's current price. The $599 retail of the Panasonic will come down after it's been out for a while, I suspect to around $425 street price or so. If the FZ-200 is as good or better than the FZ-150 I'd say the FZ-200 will be a clear winner over the Canon SX-40 for a while and Canon will come up with an SX-50 quickly to be a direct competition - and it will also start out at around $599 retail.
quote=Donwitz I did a quick internet search, and ... (show quote)


Snapsort?? There are people out there who STILL believe this site has any real value??!!? HAHAHA! =D That's so sadly funny.

Reply
Sep 4, 2012 15:22:37   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
cudakite wrote:
Snapsort?? There are people out there who STILL believe this site has any real value??!!? HAHAHA! =D That's so sadly funny.


Snapsort is my new "Comic Pages" online!! All they do is look at mfg specs, not real-world usage.

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2012 15:34:11   #
cudakite Loc: San Antonio
 
Wahawk wrote:
cudakite wrote:
Snapsort?? There are people out there who STILL believe this site has any real value??!!? HAHAHA! =D That's so sadly funny.


Snapsort is my new "Comic Pages" online!! All they do is look at mfg specs, not real-world usage.


Precisely, too many other worthwhile sites out there to even bother with. One that comes to mind is Imaging Resource, especially their Comparometer. This assumes you have a good monitor dialed in.

Reply
Sep 5, 2012 11:11:08   #
prestonphoto Loc: Bath, NY
 
Wahawk wrote:
tdklex wrote:
User-P510 wrote:
tdklex wrote:
isn't it true that with the FZ 200 you can double the max zoom to 1200, making it longer than the 840 of the SX 40?


Optical Zoom - Canon wins!....Digital Zoom - Canon wins!

FZ200=48X Max Zoom v SX40=140x Max Zoom


Maybe i'm doing something wrong, o.k ? So i'm looking at all the photos i've seen with the SX 40 as well as the video. The shots i've seen with the zoom all the way out are incredible.

I mean, it looks like you can get a close up from at least 12-1500 feet and still be sharp. Trouble is, when i test one at the store, it dosen't even come close.

Is it because it's not set to Digital Zoom, which the clerk said it was, or is it because i only have so much room to zoom in the store? I must say, i'm a little confused.

Thanks for any help.
Tom
quote=User-P510 quote=tdklex isn't it true that... (show quote)


Digital zoom probably turned off. When in Auto Mode, look at the top of the LCD while zooming. Does it have a little white line about 2/3 of the way from left to right? If it does not have that the digital is not active. Also when zooming with Digital Zoom activated, there will be a 'stop' at the end of the optical zoom so you have to release the zoom lever and start it again to go into the digital zoom range. Then be sure to hold it REAL STEADY because it will be difficult to really hold steady!!
quote=tdklex quote=User-P510 quote=tdklex isn'... (show quote)


As Wahawk said, the digital zoom was probably off. I have an older Canon S3 model with focusing set up pretty much the same - there's a line at the top of the LCD/viewfinder, when focusing on mine when that line gets about 1/2 way it automatically goes digital. I'm not familiar with the SX40 (haven't got one yet) but sounds like the same basic thing only you have to release a zoom lever. You probably had the typical clerk who doesn't know anything about anything.

I asked here about the focal distance of the SX40 and was shown photos taken of things (like a water tower) that was a couple miles away and drawn in so close it looked like it was only a couple feet away. Photos like that were what made me fully decide to get the SX40.

Reply
Sep 5, 2012 11:27:28   #
prestonphoto Loc: Bath, NY
 
lol lol Just looked back thru the comments - Wahawk was the one who sent me the water tower photos.

Reply
Sep 5, 2012 13:25:23   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
prestonphoto wrote:
lol lol Just looked back thru the comments - Wahawk was the one who sent me the water tower photos.


And compare them to this flower photo! Same camera!



Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2012 12:02:48   #
William Bennett Loc: Il
 
as long that we are on the sx40 how do attach a external flash An is the CHDK a one time use to keep on a card for use later

Reply
Sep 6, 2012 12:21:37   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
William Bennett wrote:
as long that we are on the sx40 how do attach a external flash An is the CHDK a one time use to keep on a card for use later


There is a rubber cover over the Hot Shoe on the SX40. Takes a little bit to figure out how to pop it off. Slip a fingernail under the front edge, life up just a bit, then slide back. It has a 'track' to slide into the hot shoe and then some 'pegs' that press into some holes to lock it in place. There is a little case that fits on the strap that is designed to hold the hot shoe cap when you take it off.

CHDK stays on the SD cards. It can be set up for "AutoLoading" when you turn the camera on, or for "Manual Load" only when you want its features. I don't know the details of how because I have not tried it yet, but a number of others have.

Reply
Sep 6, 2012 12:30:40   #
haroldross Loc: Walthill, Nebraska
 
Wahawk wrote:
William Bennett wrote:
as long that we are on the sx40 how do attach a external flash An is the CHDK a one time use to keep on a card for use later


CHDK stays on the SD cards. It can be set up for "AutoLoading" when you turn the camera on, or for "Manual Load" only when you want its features. I don't know the details of how because I have not tried it yet, but a number of others have.


Once you have CHDK set up on the card, you can manually load the software when you want to use it or you can set it to load when you turn the camera on. I have mine set to auto load when the camera is turned on. If I decide not to use CHDK, all I need to do is use another card or simply 'unlock' the SD card. Yes, it seems strange but for the software to auto load, the SD card has to be locked. You can still delete photos from the camera when the card is locked.

Reply
Sep 6, 2012 12:32:23   #
William Bennett Loc: Il
 
Thanks Wahawk easer than i though did notknow that was under there Juat got the sx40 last week guess i schould read the manul first. the CHDK does not come if you format the card

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.