Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Yongnuo YN-560 YN560 II Flash Speedlite?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 18, 2013 12:03:26   #
theoptimist Loc: UK
 
Does anybody own and have hands on experience of using the Yongnuo flashguns? What is your opinion?Also how is it possible to activate these speedlites on and off the camera?

Reply
Feb 18, 2013 12:14:59   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
theoptimist wrote:
Does anybody own and have hands on experience of using the Yongnuo flashguns? What is your opinion?Also how is it possible to activate these speedlites on and off the camera?


I use them, and just bought another one. I love them.

You can use them off camera, the YN560 is a manual flash, no ETTL, the YN 560II is a digital version of the YN560.

You use them by triggering them via wireless triggers OR using your on-camera flash (they will see the flash and react by flashing)

Or you can buy a flash cable too but that's another discussion.

They are a great bargain in flashes...See this thread, I'm using two of them in umbrellas.

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-97611-1.html


I THINK that you can put them on your camera, but they are manual...i.e. you have to change the power manually, no matter if they are on camera or not. I THINK that the YN465 might be ETTL for on camera...not sure. you'd better check before trying this



Here is some good info on all the Yongnuo speedlights

http://speedlights.net/2010/07/14/yongnuo-yn-560-speedlite-review/

Reply
Feb 18, 2013 18:12:44   #
DOOK Loc: Maclean, Australia
 
I use a YN-560-It's manual, but very user friendly. Like Rpavich said, works off camera as well, triggered by your built in flash. I just spent $14 for a 6ft coiled tether lead to use off camera, hand held-works fine. You don't need this, but it's handy.

The YN-560 has enough output for a back yard barbie, but can be throttled right back for light fill in. A great little flash & you don't have to rob a bank to buy one.

I don't know what camera you have, but it simply mounts on the hot shoe of any mainstream brand, such as Nikon.

Reply
 
 
Feb 18, 2013 18:35:35   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
DOOK wrote:

I don't know what camera you have, but it simply mounts on the hot shoe of any mainstream brand, such as Nikon.


Edit: it does work on my camera hot shoe with no ill effects...nice. :)

Reply
Feb 18, 2013 18:42:33   #
DOOK Loc: Maclean, Australia
 
Yeah, Rpa, just slides on the hot shoe & triggers in the normal way-just like the old days.

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 02:49:37   #
theoptimist Loc: UK
 
Brand of camera, Yes that's where the problems starts. I've a Sony. I was looking to mount two of these flashes off camera and trigger them wirelessly if possible without using the on camera flash.

DOOK wrote:
I use a YN-560-It's manual, but very user friendly. Like Rpavich said, works off camera as well, triggered by your built in flash. I just spent $14 for a 6ft coiled tether lead to use off camera, hand held-works fine. You don't need this, but it's handy.

The YN-560 has enough output for a back yard barbie, but can be throttled right back for light fill in. A great little flash & you don't have to rob a bank to buy one.

I don't know what camera you have, but it simply mounts on the hot shoe of any mainstream brand, such as Nikon.
I use a YN-560-It's manual, but very user friendly... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 03:20:32   #
DOOK Loc: Maclean, Australia
 
Have a think about this...You want to use two speedlites off camera, but you need a way to fire them, right? & you don't want to use built in flash as a trigger. My logic is this, & I stand corrected. Built in flashes are pretty weak. If you used the built in flash as a trigger, its own illumination would simply be absorbed by the other two, rather then add to them.

If you really wanted no illumination from the trigger, for any reason, just put a deflector in front of the trigger flash, deflecting the light upwards. This will keep it away from the subject, but still fire the other two.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2013 04:33:55   #
theoptimist Loc: UK
 
Yes I think you have a good point, I can turn down the intensity of the built in flash as well. Do you know that theses flashguns definitely fire from the Sony built in flash?

DOOK wrote:
Have a think about this...You want to use two speedlites off camera, but you need a way to fire them, right? & you don't want to use built in flash as a trigger. My logic is this, & I stand corrected. Built in flashes are pretty weak. If you used the built in flash as a trigger, its own illumination would simply be absorbed by the other two, rather then add to them.

If you really wanted no illumination from the trigger, for any reason, just put a deflector in front of the trigger flash, deflecting the light upwards. This will keep it away from the subject, but still fire the other two.
Have a think about this...You want to use two spee... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 05:17:53   #
DOOK Loc: Maclean, Australia
 
Can't see why they won't fire from a Sony flash-a flash is a flash. Since my last post on this subject, I put a YN-560 about 15 ft from the Nikon & covered the pop up flash with 3 sheets of paper. The YN-560 still fired, so their remote sensor is obviously pretty sensitive.

I wouldn't worry much about subduing your Sony flash. If you're using two fairly powerful slave units, the illumination from the Sony flash will be 'drowned out' by the other two, & it shouldn't have any bearing on your exposure.

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 05:26:28   #
birdpix Loc: South East Pennsylvania
 
Yongnuo also makes inexpensive radio triggers that would do what you are trying to do.

Yongnuo has had some QC issues although they seem to have gotten better. I own two of their flashes and they have worked without problems.

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 05:27:35   #
theoptimist Loc: UK
 
Great thanks for your help.

DOOK wrote:
Can't see why they won't fire from a Sony flash-a flash is a flash. Since my last post on this subject, I put a YN-560 about 15 ft from the Nikon & covered the pop up flash with 3 sheets of paper. The YN-560 still fired, so their remote sensor is obviously pretty sensitive.

I wouldn't worry much about subduing your Sony flash. If you're using two fairly powerful slave units, the illumination from the Sony flash will be 'drowned out' by the other two, & it shouldn't have any bearing on your exposure.
Can't see why they won't fire from a Sony flash-a ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2013 05:44:48   #
viscountdriver Loc: East Kent UK
 
I use the 468-11 and it's TTl and as good as you can get for the price.

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 06:00:08   #
theoptimist Loc: UK
 
Yongnuo do not make them for Sony. Do they?
birdpix wrote:
Yongnuo also makes inexpensive radio triggers that would do what you are trying to do.

Yongnuo has had some QC issues although they seem to have gotten better. I own two of their flashes and they have worked without problems.

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 06:03:32   #
Skellum0
 
Has anyone tried the 565EX? It has TTL and looks amazing for the price

Reply
Feb 19, 2013 07:44:21   #
RedHot-30 Loc: Albany, New York
 
Yes, I have two YN565EX and four YN560II and I trigger all with RF603N radio triggers from my Nikon D7000.
The entire system is bullet proof. The 560II are a manual flash, and the 565EX are ittl and also manual.
I use them in a manual configuration most of the time. Have had ZERO failures with both flashes and radio triggers.
They are excellent at their price point.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.