Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Sigma Lenses
Jan 17, 2013 07:29:00 #
Now I am not posting this post to get an argument started, or a competition of whose equipment is better. I want to improve my abilities as a much better photographer by other peoples opinion and experiences. Ok to start with: a CANON EOS Rebel 3Ti; I use a Manfrotto Tripod with Ball Head; I also use a remote receiver and trigger; a Yonguo YN 560 II Flash (Fully Manual); I have these Lenses: 18-250mm; 50-200mm; 70-300mm; I try to shoot landscape, wildlife, portraits, and macro.
My question, I was reading and heard also, that Sigma is upgrading their lenses to be at or above Canon L lenses? I want to know which walk around L or equal Lens, also Portrait Lens one would want for them. I do plan on obtaining a Canon Flash (TTL), also some studio equipment (kits) providing budget allowance. But for most part, I like your thoughts not arguments. I really value your experiences people. :)
My question, I was reading and heard also, that Sigma is upgrading their lenses to be at or above Canon L lenses? I want to know which walk around L or equal Lens, also Portrait Lens one would want for them. I do plan on obtaining a Canon Flash (TTL), also some studio equipment (kits) providing budget allowance. But for most part, I like your thoughts not arguments. I really value your experiences people. :)
Jan 17, 2013 07:36:42 #
sportyman140 wrote:
I was reading and heard also, that Sigma is upgrading their lenses...
This sounds like a future event, so these potentially upgraded lenses will not be available for quite a while. Then you will have to wait for tests and reviews.
Canon L lenses are top quality, with prices to match. You will have to decide how much extra money you want to spend to get that last little bit of quality. The 70-200mm Canon L lens is very popular, and they recently introduced an f/4 lens that is less expensive than their f/2.8.
Don't rush into this. Read the suggestions here, and read lots of reviews. Consider refurbs and eBay for whatever you decide to get.
Jan 17, 2013 08:00:39 #
As "Hoss" will tell you as I sent him a review from the Canon magazine, Sigma are as good and beat Canon for quality on price.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Jan 17, 2013 08:02:50 #
more from Canon user
I use the 120-400 Sigma on my 60Ds and the 150-500 Sigma on my D7000s
My surf shots are with the 120-400
I use the 120-400 Sigma on my 60Ds and the 150-500 Sigma on my D7000s
My surf shots are with the 120-400
Jan 17, 2013 09:10:56 #
I own a few canon L series lenses. I also have a sigma 150-500mm. This photo was taen with the sigma a 500mm
Jan 17, 2013 11:45:25 #
Jan 17, 2013 11:47:51 #
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Jan 17, 2013 12:07:01 #
Jan 17, 2013 12:17:06 #
Sigmas lenses are constantly evolving. The industry forces them to do so as they are the ONLY camera manufacturer that makes their lenses available in mounts to fit competetive camera brands. Their top of the line lenses carry the "EX" designation. And while the 150-500mm OS model does not have this designation, it has consistenly beaten the Canon 100-400mm "L" as well as the Nikon 80-400mm VR lenses in all independent comparative reviews. I personally have been the cause of at least 4 photographers selling their cherished Canon 100-400mm L lenses in favor of the Sigma in just the last year. These photographers were all very impressed with the sharpness of the Sigma at all zoom levels, but most significantly impressed with the speed and accuracy of the autofocus on the Sigma when compared to the Canon. The Sigma OS is also faster acting than the Canon IS. Both the Canon 100-400mm IS L and the Nikon 80-400mm VR lenses are much older designs than the Sigma, and are both way overdue for an upgrade which may put both of them ahead of the Sigma, but it will also, undoubtedly, add several hundred dollars to their selling prices at the same time. (Sigmas 150-500mm was SIGNIFICANTLY improved over their older, non-OS model, which was marginal at best). There is no better buy in a handheld wildlife lens today than the Sigma 150-500mm, period. The Sigma 120-400mm is close to the same image quality for a bit less money if the 400mm long end will suffice for your shooting needs.
Jan 17, 2013 12:46:34 #
I really appreciate that, the thing I am trying to find is a great portrait lens and talked to Sigma a little while ago, was suggested that I buy the Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM. Now I just need to find one and see what the glass is like other going by the photos shone on their site. I really like Sigma over Canon anyways.
Jan 18, 2013 05:25:14 #
Jan 18, 2013 05:44:16 #
Decided to let Santa know that I would like the 150-500mm based on comments and photos on the UHH Forum. Santa brought me the 150-500mm for Christmas, and surprisingly the 150-500mm is larger than the older 50-500mm. He also brought me a Sigma 1.4x Teleconverter, which is being discontinued. Now to find some time on the weekend to go out and put them to use. :)
Jan 18, 2013 05:48:56 #
Have just bought a Sigma 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 DG Macro from Ebay £70.00 ,.... hope I've not wasted my money!!
Jan 18, 2013 06:10:06 #
I have the Canon 100-400L lens f4.5/5.6 which is a superb lens for wildlife. In December I purchased a Sigma 120-300 f2.8 lens which I used in Africa for wildlife shots. It is a superb lens and great for birds in flight. Be advised that this Sigma is a bit heavy, which doesn't bother me but may bother others. While on safari I had both the Canon and the Sigma lens and my go to lens was the Sigma in 90% of the time. What a fabulous lens! I hope to post some of my shots here soon. Good luck with your decision.
Jan 18, 2013 06:18:53 #
You have three lens already. The 18-250 is a walking around lens. You can use the 50-200 for portraits. Practice with what you have.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.