Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
This is the uncropped image of a sunset taken from the Target Rock National Wildlife Preserve in Huntington, NY. The photo violates a compositional guideline due to the horizon being in the center of the frame, thus splitting the picture into two.
I would like to see how others on the forum would crop this photograph, feel free to actually perform the crop if you wish. Any other C&C is welcomed. Thanks. 8-)
ISO 100, 85mm, f/22, 1.30 sec. (tripod)
I would have cropped in about 1/3 of the way from the bottom where that shore /water line turns... That section to me adds nothing to the story of the picture...
I am not convinced that I would want to crop.
As you said about where the horizon should be is just a guideline. That said, I would consider the upper shore line to be the horizon, not the top of the trees. If you accept my interpretation, you are right on. Even if you don't, I think the proportions are just fine for this image.
To my eye, it is a well balanced land(?)scape.
Mac
Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
It's a beautiful picture just as it is.
Bret
Loc: Dayton Ohio
I kinda agree with Don....I tried to get the foreground beach as dark as I could...kinda match the back shore line. Also...found some dust...either on the lens or sensor. You can see them just above the tree line...center of photo and move to the right...like 3 dots.
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
donrent wrote:
I would have cropped in about 1/3 of the way from the bottom where that shore /water line turns... That section to me adds nothing to the story of the picture...
Thanks for opining Don. The only real story of the photo was that it was freakin' cold there. :-D
Bret's version is what I would have suggested, BMac.
Congratulations on a grand shot though! LOVELY
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
lightchime wrote:
I am not convinced that I would want to crop.
As you said about where the horizon should be is just a guideline. That said, I would consider the upper shore line to be the horizon, not the top of the trees. If you accept my interpretation, you are right on. Even if you don't, I think the proportions are just fine for this image.
To my eye, it is a well balanced land(?)scape.
Thank you Lightchime for your detailed comment, so far I am not convinced to crop either. 8-)
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
ecobin wrote:
I agree with Lightchime.
Thanks for taking a look and commenting Ecobin. 8-)
sinatraman
Loc: Vero Beach Florida, Earth,alpha quaudrant
I would leave it alone. It works. the foreground provides a nice curve that leads the eye to the horizon. Yes it violates a rule of composition, BUT IT WORKS. Remember the rules are like the pirate code from pirates of the Caribbean, not so much rules as a guidebook. You should know the rules cause 95% of the time your composition is stronger by obeying them, but every photo rule is made to be broken. Your shot is lovely, peaceful and calming. print her large and hang he up! :thumbup: :thumbup: 8-) :(
by the way your photo obeys another photo rule of composition by employing a s curve which eleminates any negatives by the horizon being in the middle.
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
Mac wrote:
It's a beautiful picture just as it is.
Thanks Mac, I appreciate you taking a look. 8-)
I think you picked at great time to break one of the rules. I wouldn't do a thing to it. :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jay Pat
Loc: Round Rock, Texas, USA
I was thinking Bret's crop.
After looking at both, the original gives more space to wonder into the scene....
Hopefully, well stated from the great State of Texas!!
Pat
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.