Pentax Lens Question
Dec 29, 2012 16:54:03 #
I am currently using a Pentax 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 lens and a Pentax 55-300mm f4-5.8 lens. I am thinking about getting a Pentax 17-70mm f4 lens and a Pentax 60-250mm f4 lens. Has anyone used these lens and if you have, is there a noticeable difference in the image quality and sharpness? How does the 18-55mm compare to the 17-70mm and how does the 55-300mm compare to the 60-250mm? I know the reviews say that the f4 lens are sharper but is the sharpness really noticeable? Did you say WOW this is alot sharper or did you say this is not much better than my old lens? Thanks for any information you can give me about this. Jerry
Dec 30, 2012 10:47:56 #
The 17-70 and the 60-250 are built to professional standards. Unless you are making large prints - bigger than 8x12 - you may not see any difference, especially if you only view your shots on screen.
Dec 30, 2012 12:54:04 #
I have the 17-70 and it's good. I don't have the cheaper kit lens so I can't tell you the difference, but I would venture a guess and say that if you are a novice, you probably won't notice the difference - if you are a pro, you will.
As I said, I have this lens, but I never use it. I always use my 18-250 and am perfectly happy with my results. If you decide you'd like to get the 17-70, I will offer you mine for $450 free ship, and it looks like brand new, including box and lens covers etc. Hardly ever used. I don't use it enough to justify keeping it.
Glad to see a Pentax guy on here for a change!
As I said, I have this lens, but I never use it. I always use my 18-250 and am perfectly happy with my results. If you decide you'd like to get the 17-70, I will offer you mine for $450 free ship, and it looks like brand new, including box and lens covers etc. Hardly ever used. I don't use it enough to justify keeping it.
Glad to see a Pentax guy on here for a change!
Dec 30, 2012 18:03:48 #
Thanks for taking the time to reply, they cost alot of money so I am still trying to decide if I want to get them or not. But if they are not sharper, then I probably won't.
GrahamS wrote:
The 17-70 and the 60-250 are built to professional standards. Unless you are making large prints - bigger than 8x12 - you may not see any difference, especially if you only view your shots on screen.
Dec 30, 2012 18:06:20 #
Thanks for taking the time to reply, they cost alot of money so I am still trying to decide if I want to get them or not. But if they are not sharper, then I probably won't.
If I do decide to get one I will keep your ofter in mind. Thanks....
If I do decide to get one I will keep your ofter in mind. Thanks....
thewags wrote:
I have the 17-70 and it's good. I don't have the ... (show quote)
Dec 30, 2012 19:31:37 #
JerrysPhotos wrote:
I am currently using a Pentax 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 len... (show quote)
All of these shot on a K10d with a Tamron 28/105. It's virtually all I use! Incidently, don't be afraid nor too proud to explore the legit used market. Here in Houston we have Houston Camera Exchange, which pushes a lot of new C&E but has a great inventory to suit us on a budget! Bet you have something like that in your area.
Dec 30, 2012 20:13:18 #
Thanks for your reply, you have some nice shots.... I will check into the used market to see if we have one close to here.
Dec 30, 2012 20:56:07 #
JerrysPhotos wrote:
Thanks for your reply, you have some nice shots.... I will check into the used market to see if we have one close to here.
I would be surprised if there is not a good, well stocked retailer, who doesn't look at you funny, when you ask for a "K mount AF lens for a Pentax" body! Also check the Pop. Photog Mag ads and Google Houston Camera Exchange. Don't be in a hurry to pick the first thing you try---and if there should be a near by retailer, ie Hot Springs or Little Rock or perhaps Memphis---have your camera with you and check them out Good luck.---and Happy New Year
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.