Federal Judge Mark Scarsi this week used an 82-page opinion to remind the Hunter team that sound bites aren’t legal arguments. He efficiently dismantled and dismissed every motion. Yes, Mr. Weiss was duly appointed, and his office is lawfully funded. No, there is no evidence of animus against Hunter; the defense’s “motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice” that demonstrates vindictiveness, beyond media speculation. And there is certainly no reason to throw out the case on grounds that Republicans bragged about provoking the charges, since “politicians take credit for many things over which they have no power and have made no impact.” (Truer words were never written.)
The result: Barring surprises, Hunter begins his California trial on June 20. Judge Scarsi’s ruling could also serve as a template for Judge Maryellen Noreika, who will soon rule on a similar set of dismissal motions in her Delaware courtroom. Assuming she too throws them out, Hunter’s trial there begins June 3.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-hunter-biden-s-legal-collapse/ar-BB1l5KQz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=905a93a9b7a24f7c9780c9a4909e223a&ei=77
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
FrumCA wrote:
Federal Judge Mark Scarsi this week used an 82-page opinion to remind the Hunter team that sound bites aren’t legal arguments. He efficiently dismantled and dismissed every motion. Yes, Mr. Weiss was duly appointed, and his office is lawfully funded. No, there is no evidence of animus against Hunter; the defense’s “motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice” that demonstrates vindictiveness, beyond media speculation. And there is certainly no reason to throw out the case on grounds that Republicans bragged about provoking the charges, since “politicians take credit for many things over which they have no power and have made no impact.” (Truer words were never written.)
The result: Barring surprises, Hunter begins his California trial on June 20. Judge Scarsi’s ruling could also serve as a template for Judge Maryellen Noreika, who will soon rule on a similar set of dismissal motions in her Delaware courtroom. Assuming she too throws them out, Hunter’s trial there begins June 3.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-hunter-biden-s-legal-collapse/ar-BB1l5KQz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=905a93a9b7a24f7c9780c9a4909e223a&ei=77Federal Judge Mark Scarsi this week used an 82-pag... (
show quote)
“”” sound bites aren’t legal arguments”””” someone should point that out to trump.
But as far as Hunter goes. Let the court decide and if guilty he should get the same punishment as other for the crimes- not more or less because his last name is Biden .
DennyT wrote:
“”” sound bites aren’t legal arguments”””” someone should point that out to trump.
But as far as Hunter goes. Let the court decide and if guilty he should get the same punishment as other for the crimes- not more or less because his last name is Biden .
Uncharacteristically reasonable. Are you sure you don't want to take the liberal approach to convict him without a trial?
Not when it's commenting on a thread I started. Now on the other hand, speaking of trolls...
FrumCA wrote:
Not when it's commenting on a thread I started. Now on the other hand, speaking of trolls...
Yeah, right! You out and out solicit adversity because you didn't get any and I'm the troll!
Nice try!
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
FrumCA wrote:
Uncharacteristically reasonable. Are you sure you don't want to take the liberal approach to convict him without a trial?
It’s the second time I have said the same thing .
FrumCA wrote:
Federal Judge Mark Scarsi this week used an 82-page opinion to remind the Hunter team that sound bites aren’t legal arguments. He efficiently dismantled and dismissed every motion. Yes, Mr. Weiss was duly appointed, and his office is lawfully funded. No, there is no evidence of animus against Hunter; the defense’s “motion is remarkable in that it fails to include a single declaration, exhibit, or request for judicial notice” that demonstrates vindictiveness, beyond media speculation. And there is certainly no reason to throw out the case on grounds that Republicans bragged about provoking the charges, since “politicians take credit for many things over which they have no power and have made no impact.” (Truer words were never written.)
The result: Barring surprises, Hunter begins his California trial on June 20. Judge Scarsi’s ruling could also serve as a template for Judge Maryellen Noreika, who will soon rule on a similar set of dismissal motions in her Delaware courtroom. Assuming she too throws them out, Hunter’s trial there begins June 3.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-hunter-biden-s-legal-collapse/ar-BB1l5KQz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=905a93a9b7a24f7c9780c9a4909e223a&ei=77Federal Judge Mark Scarsi this week used an 82-pag... (
show quote)
Sooo ... Nothing on Joe Biden? Again? Too bad the stable genius tried to bugger Zelensky's arms shipments with his quid pro quo/Biden dirt desperation. He wouldn't be a twice impeached one-termer today.
DaveO wrote:
Yeah, right! You out and out solicit adversity because you didn't get any and I'm the troll!
Nice try!
Soliciting adversity?? Hardly. All I did was post a report on H. Biden's upcoming court dates. The adversity is created by those of you who push back on the contents of the report.
Texcaster wrote:
Sooo ... Nothing on Joe Biden? Again? Too bad the stable genius tried to bugger Zelensky's arms shipments with his quid pro quo/Biden dirt desperation. He wouldn't be a twice impeached one-termer today.
Nope. This is about Hunter. Let's see what comes out at trial.
FrumCA wrote:
Nope. This is about Hunter. Let's see what comes out at trial.
LOL! and GET REAL! It's always been about Old Joe Biden.
DennyT wrote:
“”” sound bites aren’t legal arguments”””” someone should point that out to trump.
But as far as Hunter goes. Let the court decide and if guilty he should get the same punishment as other for the crimes- not more or less because his last name is Biden .
What are the most effective punishments for a laptop?
Texcaster wrote:
LOL! and GET REAL! It's always been about Old Joe Biden.
You're right. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.