Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Critique Section
Artistic or Blurry?
Mar 5, 2024 22:58:49   #
azemon Loc: Saint Charles, MO, USA
 
I have usually tended strongly toward highly detailed, clear-as-possible photos. Last week, I grabbed this shot northeast of Arches National Park. It isn't super sharp (probably because I shot at 1/13 from a moving Amtrak ) but I like it. I'm trying to decide whether it's actually artistic or whether I'm just getting senile or something else entirely. What do you think?

I'm open to any critique, including on the artsy-ness and on the post-processing technique.

Shot with a Nikon Z 7ii and the Nikkor Z 24-120 F4 at 1/13, F22, ISO 100. Postprocessing in RawTherapee to cut the haze a bit and crank the saturation and contrast.

-- Art Z.

Artistic or Blurry?
Artistic or Blurry?...
(Download)

NEF original, converted to JPEG and downsize (no other processing)
NEF original, converted to JPEG and downsize (no o...
(Download)

Reply
Mar 6, 2024 04:22:20   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
#2 looks more natural because it's had the least processing. #1 looks surprisingly natural considering the amount of processing it's had. One of the things that makes haze so difficult to deal with is that it obscures what's behind it. When you get rid of the haze you expose the lack of detail, colour and contrast. That's not a good starting point if you want to end up with something that looks convincingly natural. Your edit is probably about as good as it's going to get. Any attempts to make it less hazy will probably result in darks that are too solid and highlights that are too suppressed. Haze is most noticeable in the highlights and upper mid tones, and if you remove them you remove much of the contrast. Haze is also predominantly blue and if you remove the blue, what's left behind will be mostly colourless.

Reply
Apr 16, 2024 13:07:45   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
I kind of like it. Those rock structures in the center certainly come out more in the processed image. At first glance I thought you might have added those in the give the feeling of the ruins of some ancient civilization in the distance. That small mystery is what drew me into the photo.

I can't say I like the movement blur in the foreground [#2]. It's distracting and gives away the fact that you were in a moving vehicle. I suppose shooting through a layer of glass from a moving train is going to give unavoidable blur. It is what it is. Your idea of cropping all that out definitely improved the image. Overall I think it's an interesting shot.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Critique Section
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.