Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 VR lens
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Feb 29, 2024 18:11:43   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
User ID wrote:
Same here. Maybe Im a little more varied and thorough than you, but not by much, and NO useless geeky "lab test" stuff for me.

OTOH those "nobody really shoots brick walls" retorts are simply NOT true. See pix below. Yes some walls have no bricks, but they have other things :-)


Brick walls are of an endless variety - and endlessly photogenic

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 15:36:07   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It is mounted on my Nikon D700.

I bought the body only and then this lens it as it seemed to be ideal for the type of photography shown here.

I still have the D700 with this lens on it. In today's world, the 12mp of the D700 seems very low. That is not and never has been a problem for me. My only photographic product is the print I make. The maximum size my printer will put out is 13X19", so not really a challenge to this body/lens combination.

I have never updated the D700. I like it too much to ever get rid of it. It was my second digital camera, the first being a 'tough' compact.

This image was from my first time out with this rig. My bride was seated nearby while I photographed this cruise. After about 30 minutes of taking pictures I walked over to her and told her this was the best camera I had ever picked up. That was not only the quality of images I was getting, but the heft and overall feel of the camera. It rivals my film first generation Leicaflex and bullseye Contarex film cameras. That admittedly subjective impression has never left me.

How would this lens or body/lens fare tested against a brick wall? Don't know. Don't care. The real world test for me is whether or not the body/lens combination is giving me the images I want.

This system does.



Reply
Mar 1, 2024 17:23:36   #
User ID
 
RetCapt wrote:
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It is mounted on my Nikon D700.

I bought the body only and then this lens it as it seemed to be ideal for the type of photography shown here.

I still have the D700 with this lens on it. In today's world, the 12mp of the D700 seems very low. That is not and never has been a problem for me. My only photographic product is the print I make. The maximum size my printer will put out is 13X19", so not really a challenge to this body/lens combination.

I have never updated the D700. I like it too much to ever get rid of it. It was my second digital camera, the first being a 'tough' compact.

This image was from my first time out with this rig. My bride was seated nearby while I photographed this cruise. After about 30 minutes of taking pictures I walked over to her and told her this was the best camera I had ever picked up. That was not only the quality of images I was getting, but the heft and overall feel of the camera. It rivals my film first generation Leicaflex and bullseye Contarex film cameras. That admittedly subjective impression has never left me.

How would this lens or body/lens fare tested against a brick wall? Don't know. Don't care. The real world test for me is whether or not the body/lens combination is giving me the images I want.

This system does.
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It ... (show quote)

Favorable bright light. No need for VR !

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2024 18:03:38   #
joecichjr Loc: Chicago S. Suburbs, Illinois, USA
 
RetCapt wrote:
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It is mounted on my Nikon D700.

I bought the body only and then this lens it as it seemed to be ideal for the type of photography shown here.

I still have the D700 with this lens on it. In today's world, the 12mp of the D700 seems very low. That is not and never has been a problem for me. My only photographic product is the print I make. The maximum size my printer will put out is 13X19", so not really a challenge to this body/lens combination.

I have never updated the D700. I like it too much to ever get rid of it. It was my second digital camera, the first being a 'tough' compact.

This image was from my first time out with this rig. My bride was seated nearby while I photographed this cruise. After about 30 minutes of taking pictures I walked over to her and told her this was the best camera I had ever picked up. That was not only the quality of images I was getting, but the heft and overall feel of the camera. It rivals my film first generation Leicaflex and bullseye Contarex film cameras. That admittedly subjective impression has never left me.

How would this lens or body/lens fare tested against a brick wall? Don't know. Don't care. The real world test for me is whether or not the body/lens combination is giving me the images I want.

This system does.
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It ... (show quote)


Such a beautifully shot, dazzling vehicle 🎈🎈🎈

Reply
Mar 1, 2024 20:12:14   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
True, the light made it.

This was late afternoon. I was standing near the intersection with a street which created a opening for the very low sun to come through off my right shoulder and spotlight vehicles as they hit just the right spot. That was very brief, but it made the photograph.

Lot of nostalgia in that one for me. I was in high school when these Fords were made (57). My girlfriend's family had one just like this and we cruised in it. So this photo takes me back. We went our separate ways when we graduated high school and I left for college. But that car.....

Given the light gods were most generous, but since that was my initial result from this camera/lens combination, I think it is understandable why I am so attached to this rig.

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 01:34:18   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
RetCapt wrote:
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It is mounted on my Nikon D700.

I bought the body only and then this lens it as it seemed to be ideal for the type of photography shown here.

I still have the D700 with this lens on it. In today's world, the 12mp of the D700 seems very low. That is not and never has been a problem for me. My only photographic product is the print I make. The maximum size my printer will put out is 13X19", so not really a challenge to this body/lens combination.

I have never updated the D700. I like it too much to ever get rid of it. It was my second digital camera, the first being a 'tough' compact.

This image was from my first time out with this rig. My bride was seated nearby while I photographed this cruise. After about 30 minutes of taking pictures I walked over to her and told her this was the best camera I had ever picked up. That was not only the quality of images I was getting, but the heft and overall feel of the camera. It rivals my film first generation Leicaflex and bullseye Contarex film cameras. That admittedly subjective impression has never left me.

How would this lens or body/lens fare tested against a brick wall? Don't know. Don't care. The real world test for me is whether or not the body/lens combination is giving me the images I want.

This system does.
I have the early non-VR version of this lens. It ... (show quote)
great light and beautiful color!

I see pics from the early DSLRs and the color was great, rich beautiful tones!

Manuf have added more pixels since then but what has that done to the color of the image?

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 01:53:41   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
Thank you.

The only way to know if it was the camera or just the unique nature of that light would have been to have another, different, camera and lens right beside it at the time.

I have only had light like that, warm and extremely low, about to drop beyond the horizon, one other time, when the Grand Canyon Rail Road was making its afternoon arrival in Williams, AZ. I got similarly spectacular results from a much more modest camera. On that one I converted to black and white, and it looks great. The common thread was the light.

Great light is that elusive lightning in a bottle.

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2024 16:22:59   #
flyboy61 Loc: The Great American Desert
 
User ID wrote:
Same here. Maybe Im a little more varied and thorough than you, but not by much, and NO useless geeky "lab test" stuff for me.

OTOH those "nobody really shoots brick walls" retorts are simply NOT true. See pix below. Yes some walls have no bricks, but they have other things :-)



Reply
Mar 2, 2024 16:38:15   #
User ID
 
JD750 wrote:
great light and beautiful color!

I see pics from the early DSLRs and the color was great, rich beautiful tones!

Manuf have added more pixels since then but what has that done to the color of the image?

Maybe youre a fan of CCD sensors without actually knowing much about them ?

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 16:43:04   #
User ID
 
RetCapt wrote:
Thank you.

The only way to know if it was the camera or just the unique nature of that light would have been to have another, different, camera and lens right beside it at the time.

I have only had light like that, warm and extremely low, about to drop beyond the horizon, one other time, when the Grand Canyon Rail Road was making its afternoon arrival in Williams, AZ. I got similarly spectacular results from a much more modest camera. On that one I converted to black and white, and it looks great. The common thread was the light.

Great light is that elusive lightning in a bottle.
Thank you. br br The only way to know if it was t... (show quote)

I dont shoot sunsets. Around sunset youll see the best looking scenes by looking eastward.

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 18:47:39   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
The photograph of the Ford was taken facing east. As I said, the sun was coming in over my right shoulder. I was pointed in the direction of where the photograph was.

But, unlike you, I do sunsets. Here is one from Carmel, CA, end of 2023.

In this instance I was facing west, because that was where the photograph was.

I don't believe in restrictive generalizations about which way to face. I face in whatever direction the image I want is located.

All that matters is the photograph.



Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2024 19:56:08   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
RetCapt wrote:
The photograph of the Ford was taken facing east. As I said, the sun was coming in over my right shoulder. I was pointed in the direction of where the photograph was.

But, unlike you, I do sunsets. Here is one from Carmel, CA, end of 2023.

In this instance I was facing west, because that was where the photograph was.

I don't believe in restrictive generalizations about which way to face. I face in whatever direction the image I want is located.

All that matters is the photograph.
The photograph of the Ford was taken facing east. ... (show quote)


Lovely sunset clouds.

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 20:34:19   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
Thank you photophile. We have family in Carmel, and we stayed there over Christmas.

We had several days where the fog/marine deck was so thick that there was no sunset. Our last afternoon there it looked like there would be a sunset, so I want down to the beach.

That one sunset was enough to make the trip worth it, from a photographic standpoint.

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 20:34:38   #
RetCapt Loc: NorCal mountains
 
RetCapt wrote:
Thank you photophile. We have family in Carmel, and we stayed there over Christmas.

We had several days where the fog/marine deck was so thick that there was no sunset. Our last afternoon there it looked like there would be a sunset, so I want down to the beach.

That one sunset was enough to make the trip worth it, from a photographic standpoint.

Reply
Mar 2, 2024 23:34:33   #
User ID
 
RetCapt wrote:
The photograph of the Ford was taken facing east. As I said, the sun was coming in over my right shoulder. I was pointed in the direction of where the photograph was.

But, unlike you, I do sunsets. Here is one from Carmel, CA, end of 2023.

In this instance I was facing west, because that was where the photograph was.

I don't believe in restrictive generalizations about which way to face. I face in whatever direction the image I want is located.

All that matters is the photograph.
The photograph of the Ford was taken facing east. ... (show quote)

You were patient and you won out. Acoarst I might have been viewing those beach goers with the sun at my back. Cool pix of orange faces with squinting eyes !

Ive attached examples below of what I spoke of earlier.
.

Looking Eastward
Looking Eastward...
(Download)

Looking Eastward
Looking Eastward...
(Download)

Looking Northward
Looking Northward...
(Download)

Looking Southward
Looking Southward...
(Download)

Northeastward with complicated reflections
Northeastward with complicated reflections...
(Download)

Reflections again
Reflections again...
(Download)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.