How ironic, motion pictures used by television media showed the public the true horror (for both sides) of the Vietnam war compared to getting a sanitized printed version of a press release. Now the public will be getting whichever version that particular media wants to promote. When the public finally realizes what’s going on, they won’t believe even the authentic images. Then we’ll be back to being spoon fed propaganda.
Just another nail in the coffin of "truth" in photography.
Google for "stock image sources". There are plenty of sources for any sort of image you might have an interest in. They seem to all be based on the idea that artists, including photographers, can use a method of selling their work.
In this case, the artists and Adobe both labeled the art work as AI generated.
I don't see the AI problem!
We used to laugh at the rather obvious (and feeble) attempts by the Soviets to "crop" people out of photographs (and sometimes to add extraneous items). Now, everyone does it, and photos no longer provide documentary "proof" in courts of law. Perhaps most folks are familiar with the Stalin "re-image" that removed now-undesirable Nikolai Yezhov. In fact, during Stalin's purges, every photo that contained images of Leon Trotsky were ordered erased.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.