Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
mjc film friday 2024-01-12
Jan 12, 2024 11:32:28   #
mjc925 Loc: SF Bay Area
 
Another Kodak IR film shot from circa 2004. Not everyone's cup of tea type film, but I always had a good time using it.



Reply
Jan 12, 2024 12:47:23   #
riderxlx Loc: DFW area Texas
 
mjc925 wrote:
Another Kodak IR film shot from circa 2004. Not everyone's cup of tea type film, but I always had a good time using it.


Looks good to me.
bruce.

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 13:38:38   #
Just Fred Loc: Darwin's Waiting Room
 
I never shot with IR film, although I did a lot of B&W in my youth, and did all my own darkroom work. How does one develop and process IR?

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Jan 12, 2024 14:39:28   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
I think her name must be Sandy ??

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 17:20:14   #
mjc925 Loc: SF Bay Area
 
couple things with Kodak IR film. First you had to load/unload it in the complete dark or in a changing bag, so that was fun sitting on a beach loading a roll of film by feel alone. Second you typically used a dark red or IR filter on the lens of your SLR. The dark red you could see through a little bit but was hard to focus (autofocus was not so good). The IR filter you could not see through at all and had to focus and than put the filter on (slow and tedious). Another issue was that you had to "adjust" your focus to allow for the IR light focusing on a different plane than visible light. Look at an old lens, see a red dot or line or something just a bit off the center focus line, you had to focus and than slightly adjust the lens to the point on the lens that was in focus visually is now lined up with that little red dot. Not a huge deal if you shot at f-8 or smaller, but a bigger deal wide open or shallow depth of field. Unfortunately, your effective ISO was in the 10-25 range so shooting f/8 was difficult. Final issue is you had no idea what the proper exposure was as a light meter doesn't usually account for the IR light we are trying to capture. So you just sorta guess and bracketed. Developing was just like any BW film and printing the same, just a very grainy image (usually)

Reply
Jan 12, 2024 17:45:07   #
Merlin1300 Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
 
mjc925 wrote:
Developing was just like any BW film and printing the same, just a very grainy image (usually)
So ?? Maybe she wasn't Sandy, just Grainy ??

Reply
Jan 13, 2024 05:58:26   #
Manglesphoto Loc: 70 miles south of St.Louis
 
mjc925 wrote:
Another Kodak IR film shot from circa 2004. Not everyone's cup of tea type film, but I always had a good time using it.



Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jan 13, 2024 09:38:32   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 

Reply
Jan 13, 2024 16:01:20   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.