Cany143 wrote:
The third --the 'strange' one-- is a result of 12 separate exposures that were shot and processed in the Pep Ventosa manner, so it's strangeness is a result of intent rather than accident, and might best be considered an abstraction of reality. Those same 12 exposures were used in the making of #2 as well, but rather than stacking and processing the images Ventosa-style, they were instead merged together as a pano, resulting in a 'realistic' looking abstract. Or if not that, then a landscape that does and doesn't actually exist. The first, #1, is little more than augmented reality, or 'reality' as my mind chose to make it.
The third --the 'strange' one-- is a result of 12 ... (
show quote)
Thanks for the explanation. The work is quite interesting.